Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Thorpe Greenways Junior SchoolOfsted inspection, 6 Mar 2007
Ofsted inspected Thorpe Greenways Junior School on 6 Mar 2007, led by Robert Drew. The overall judgement was Satisfactory. Ofsted published the report on 27 Mar 2007. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Mar 2007
- Inspectorssingle source
Robert Drew
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
SS1 3BS
- Name on report verified
Thorpe Greenways Junior School
- URN verified
114777
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2005.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Occasionally, relationships in lessons are so positive and the match of tasks to pupils' needs so accurate that excellent learning takes place. p.4
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 5 °6 March 2007 p.9
- Pupils respond with excellent behaviour and a mature regard for their p.4
- The school's excellent range of musical, sporting and other extra-curricular activities enriches pupils' experience immensely. p.4
- The school offers an excellent range of extra-curricular clubs, activities and visits; p.11
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Raise standards in the core subjects by setting targets which are more challenging and better reflect the success of other more ambitious schools. p.5
- Eliminate the small amount of unsatisfactory teaching and ensure all lessons employ the clear structure and pace seen in the majority. p.5
- Strengthen science using the successful strategies used to promote English and mathematics, and by completing the reshaping of the science curriculum. p.5
- Improve the quality of marking by implementing school policy effectively. p.5
- Test results for 2006 at the end of Key Stage 2 were above average in English and mathematics, and average in science. p.5
- These standards continue to be sustained in English, representing good progress from entry in Year 3, while current standards in mathematics and science are average and pupils make satisfactory progress. p.5
- In all three subjects, pupils gain more high levels than previously. p.5
- There has thus been sufficient improvement on the issues raised in the last inspection. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,463
- about usual (typical 2787)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Thorpe Greenways Junior School
p.1
114777 Unique Reference Number SOUTHEND-ON-SEA Local Authority 294565 Inspection number 5 °6 March 2007 Inspection dates Robert Drew Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Greenways School address Junior Type of school Southend-on-sea Community School category Essex SS1 3BS 7 °11 Age range of pupils 01702 468057 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01702 602122 Fax number 496 Number on roll (school) Mr Ian Turner Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Paul Fairbrass Headteacher 16 November 2005 Date of previous school inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 294565 5 °6 March 2007 7°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
The school is larger than average, serving the Thorpe Bay area of Southend-on-Sea. The great majority of pupils are White British with small numbers coming from several minority ethnic groups. About 4% have English as an additional language. Pupils come from a wide range of social and economic backgrounds, though the proportion entitled to free school meals is below average. Pupils' attainment when they start Year 3 is broadly average, though fewer pupils than nationally have learning difficulties or disabilities.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 5 °6 March 2007
p.3
Grade: 3
The school's overall effectiveness is satisfactory. It has made sufficient improvement since the last inspection and its results now broadly match national standards at the end of Key Stage 2. Achievement is satisfactory and personal development good. Therefore in accordance with section 13 (5) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school no longer requires significant improvement. The care, guidance and support offered by the school have long been good, encouraging good personal development by pupils. Staff now make much better use of assessment information than at the time of the last inspection and the school's analysis of data helps identify learning needs early and provide appropriate support quickly. Staff promote personal safety, healthy lifestyles and pupils' contribution to the community very effectively. Pupils respond with excellent behaviour and a mature regard for their
p.4
Grade: 3
own well-being and that of others. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good as is attendance. The school's excellent range of musical, sporting and other extra-curricular activities enriches pupils' experience immensely. They help create confident individuals who work well together. This promotes successful relationships in the wider community. The formal curriculum has been strengthened and is satisfactory, though the school has yet to complete its upgrading of the place of science. Teaching and learning are satisfactory and improving. Many lessons generate real enthusiasm amongst pupils. This is usually in response to teachers sustaining rapid pace, involving pupils by name and providing demanding work for all abilities. Occasionally, relationships in lessons are so positive and the match of tasks to pupils' needs so accurate that excellent learning takes place. In the rare instances of inadequate
p.4
Grade: 3
teaching, in contrast, where pace is slow and tasks are not explained clearly, pupils lose interest. There are also some inconsistencies in the quality and effectiveness of teachers' marking of pupils' work. Some teachers mark pupils' work thoroughly and show pupils how to improve but others leave work unmarked or just mark with ticks or crosses. The work of leaders and managers is satisfactory overall. The headteacher and the newly formed senior team provide good direction and have sustained high morale during a difficult phase in the school's history. They have introduced necessary changes and teaching, the curriculum, the use of data and the role of subject leaders have all begun to improve. Standards in English have risen markedly, closely followed by those in mathematics. An increased percentage of able pupils now reach the higher levels in all subjects. Subject leadership is now satisfactory; it is particularly effective in
p.4
Grade: 3
English, while in mathematics and science it is secure but very new. While standards meet targets, in the light of the improvements made, these are no longer sufficiently challenging. In science improvement has been satisfactory but standards lag behind those of the other core subjects. The governing body is more active than at the time of the previous inspection. Its monitoring of the school, and support and challenge of senior leaders ensure it has a satisfactory impact. 2 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 5 °6 March 2007 Value for money is satisfactory. The school has shown it has a satisfactory capacity for improvement, evaluates its quality and effectiveness accurately and acts effectively on its analysis of strengths and weaknesses.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Raise standards in the core subjects by setting targets which are more challenging and better reflect the success of other more ambitious schools. • Eliminate the small amount of unsatisfactory teaching and ensure all lessons employ the clear structure and pace seen in the majority. • Strengthen science using the successful strategies used to promote English and mathematics, and by completing the reshaping of the science curriculum. • Improve the quality of marking by implementing school policy effectively.
p.5
Grade: 3
Test results for 2006 at the end of Key Stage 2 were above average in English and mathematics, and average in science. These standards continue to be sustained in English, representing good progress from entry in Year 3, while current standards in mathematics and science are average and pupils make satisfactory progress. In all three subjects, pupils gain more high levels than previously. There has thus been sufficient improvement on the issues raised in the last inspection. In English the improvements are good. Crucially the school now monitors pupils' academic progress closely and takes swifter action to eliminate underachievement. Pupils with particular learning needs make sound progress. New booster classes and support groups in English and mathematics give pupils valuable additional help, though similar provision in science is lacking. Teachers use data well to shape lessons and help pupils understand their
p.5
Grade: 3
targets. Challenging work for the more able is set regularly. The school is meeting its targets, but they are less challenging than they might be, in the light of recent improvements.
p.5
Grade: 2
Personal development and well-being are good. Pupils' behaviour is outstanding. They are proud of their school and their attendance is above average. The school successfully promotes an impressive ethos of mutual respect between adults and pupils. There are plenty of chances for pupils to work together and they become good at doing this. They appreciate the help they receive from teachers and teaching assistants; they feel safe and comfortable at school. Pupils have no concerns about bullying and think the school deals with their problems well. They learn about eating healthily and the vegetables they grow are used for school lunches. There is a wide range of popular physical activities that provide healthy exercise. Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. They have a good appreciation of their responsibilities 3 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 5 °6 March 2007
p.5
Grade: 2
to the wider community through raising funds for charities. Pupils' basic skills in preparation for the next phase of education are satisfactory.
p.6
Grade: 3
The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory but varies from inadequate to outstanding. Much of the teaching is good and productive learning prevails. In a small number of lessons progress is inadequate because teachers' expectations of pupils' performance are too low and work is not matched closely enough to pupils' widely varying stages of development. Relationships between teachers and pupils are generally excellent and this contributes to high levels of motivation. Pupils enjoy learning. In nearly all classes, lessons are thoroughly planned and carefully prepared. Pupils rise to the challenges set. In Year 3, for example, pupils enjoy learning terms such as 'imperative verbs'. There are, however, inconsistencies in the quality of marking, with some teachers offering regular and explicit help to pupils and others leaving work unmarked or failing to show pupils how to improve.
p.6
Grade: 3
The curriculum is satisfactory and is improving. The school's increased emphasis on developing pupils' literacy and numeracy skills addresses pupils' needs well. Necessary work has now begun on revising the science curriculum to provide more focused science lessons. Skills in information and communication technology (ICT) are taught systematically but pupils have limited opportunity to use these in other subjects. The school makes outstanding provision for extra-curricular activities, including residential visits that enhance pupils' physical and creative education and develop new skills. There are exceptional opportunities to play instruments in the school's orchestras and bands. Pupils learn French and there are well-established links with a French school. The personal, social and health education programme is good and ensures that pupils develop confidence as learners and enjoy their time at school. Good provision is made
p.6
Grade: 3
to develop pupils' understanding of the importance of healthy lifestyles and the school prepares them satisfactorily for life after school.
p.6
Grade: 2
The school provides a very caring and supportive environment in which pupils feel happy and safe. This contributes to their good personal development. Parents are generally positive about the school. Effective procedures are in place for safeguarding pupils and these comply with government requirements. Health and safety checks are rigorous to ensure pupils' well-being. Pupils know that adults will listen to any concerns they might have. Pupils say, 'Teachers are kind'. There are examples of good support 4 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 5 °6 March 2007 for pupils who are going through periods of particular emotional need, ensuring they are successfully included in school life and continue to learn. The school works effectively with outside agencies to support pupils with additional needs. Procedures for tracking pupils' progress in English, mathematics and science are now good, ensuring
p.6
Grade: 2
that teachers know their pupils' capabilities and generally how to move their learning forward.
p.7
Grade: 3
The headteacher provides strong leadership and is much respected by pupils, parents and the community. The contribution of year group and subject leaders is improving and is now satisfactory. They make a sound overall contribution to promoting consistency in what is taught in each class and in each year group but their monitoring of pupils' work remains limited. As a result, too much inconsistency persists, for instance, in the effectiveness of teachers' marking. One major improvement since the last inspection is the sharper emphasis on measuring pupils' achievement in literacy, numeracy and science. The data produced is used well to set precise targets for the amount of progress each pupil is expected to make each term. If pupils do not make as much progress as expected, extra support is quickly provided to help pupils to catch up. This has had a significant impact on raising standards across the school and
p.7
Grade: 3
providing effective equal opportunities for pupils. Governors are acutely aware of the school's strengths and weaknesses. They are increasingly involved in monitoring the school's performance. Finances are managed well and the team of administrative assistants ensure that the day-to-day running of the school operates smoothly. 5 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 5 °6 March 2007 .
p.7
Grade: 3
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 5 °6 March 2007
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The behaviour of learners 2 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
and interests of learners?
2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 5 °6 March 2007
p.9
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 5 °6 March 2007
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
8 March 2007 Dear Pupils Thorpe Greenways Junior School, Greenways, Thorpe bay, Southend-on-Sea Thank you for making us feel very welcome during our recent visit. Many of you took the time to speak to us and we are very grateful. There are many good things about the school. • Standards have risen and you now make satisfactory progress. Your progress in English is good. • Teaching is satisfactory overall but many lessons are good and a few are outstanding. • The school offers an excellent range of extra-curricular clubs, activities and visits; • Your behaviour is excellent. • The headteacher leads the school well. • The way the school cares, guides and supports you is good. To improve further the school needs to: • set you targets which match the challenging ones seen across the country so that your progress moves from satisfactory to good • make sure that the small amount of unsatisfactory teaching is removed and all your work
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
is marked regularly and helpfully • complete the changes being made to the way science is organised. Best wishes your future at Thorpe Greenways. Yours sincerely Robert Drew (Lead inspector) 9 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 5 °6 March 2007
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion