Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Thorpe Greenways Junior SchoolOfsted inspection, 17 Nov 2005

Inspected 17 Nov 2005 · published 21 Dec 2005 · URN 114777

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Ofsted inspected Thorpe Greenways Junior School on 17 Nov 2005, led by Juliet Winstanley LI. The overall judgement was Inadequate. Ofsted published the report on 21 Dec 2005. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Nov 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Juliet Winstanley LI

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    SS1 3BS

  • Name on report verified

    Thorpe Greenways Junior School

  • URN verified

    114777

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveexceptionallyenjoyeffectivelyimprovedeffectivestrongexcellent
Criticisminadequatelackinsufficientbelownot sufficientlyweaknessesnot rigorousnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1360w+52
  • What needs to improve1392w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,723
about usual (typical 2932)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%What needs to improve 50%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Thorpe Greenways Junior School

p.1

114777 Unique Reference Number SOUTHEND-ON-SEA LEA LEA 279448 Inspection number 16 November 2005 to 17 November 2005 Inspection dates Ms. Juliet Winstanley LI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Greenways School address Junior Type of school SS1 3BS Community School category 7 to 11 Age range of pupils 01702468057 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01702602122 Fax number 474 Number on roll Mr.Ian Turner Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr. Paul Fairbrass Headteacher 18 September 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 279448 16 November 2005 - 7 to 11 17 November 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and two additional inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Thorpe Greenways Junior is a larger than average school situated in the Thorpe Bay area of Southend-on-Sea in Essex. The local population served by the school represents a wide mix of social backgrounds with many pupils coming from a part of the local area that has a high level of deprivation. The number of pupils eligible for free school meals is below average. Pupils are mostly of white British heritage, although there are a few from minority ethnic backgrounds, several of whom are at the early stages of learning English. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities, including those with formal Statements, is below average. Attainment on entry to the school represents the full range of ability and is average overall.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 16 November 2005 to 17 November 2005

p.3

Grade: 4

Thorpe Greenways Junior School has several strengths but overall the school's effectiveness is inadequate. The school judges its effectiveness to be better than this. Although standards in English and mathematics show some improvement, pupils are not achieving as well as they should, particularly those who are more able. Actions to improve standards have been identified but are only just beginning to have an impact on pupils' achievement. The quality of teaching is satisfactory overall but the content of some lessons is too easy for pupils, so that not all of them do as well as they should. The school successfully manages the pupils' behaviour. Relationships between the pupils and the adults in the school are good. Consequently, pupils' behaviour, their attitudes to learning and personal development are good. The pupils enjoy school and feel well cared for and secure. Parents and pupils hold the school in high regard. The

p.4

Grade: 4

curriculum is considerably enriched by the many opportunities provided for pupils to take part in music and sporting activities. The leadership and management of the school at all levels are satisfactory. However the school's view of its effectiveness reflects too positive a picture in the light of the underachievement throughout the school. Systems for checking how well the school is performing are not sufficiently rigorous. There is a lack of formal monitoring by senior managers and the little that does take place is not coordinated nor feeds systematically into strategic planning. The role of subject leaders is developing and there is now a greater focus on raising standards of achievement. The school has adequately addressed the issues raised in the last inspection and demonstrates a satisfactory capacity to improve further. Overall it provides satisfactory value for money. Nevertheless in accordance with section 13

p.4

Grade: 4

(3) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector (HMCI) is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a Notice to Improve. Significant improvement is required in relation to: raising standards and improving pupils' achievement.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

- Raise standards and improve achievement in English, mathematics and science, particularly for the more able pupils, by improving teachers' expectations of what pupils can achieve. - Strengthen leadership and management through more rigorous self-evaluation and the challenge it provides to raise standards and improve the quality of teaching and learning.

p.4

Grade: 4

In 2004 standards were well below average in English, below in mathematics and average in science. The latest results show that standards in English and mathematics have risen and are now closer to the national average, although standards in science have fallen. However, taking account of the standard of pupils' work on entry, which 2 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 16 November 2005 to 17 November 2005 is average, pupils' achievement overall is inadequate. The more able pupils in particular could do better but the work they are given is not always challenging enough. Boys do not perform as well as girls in English or science. Systems to track how well pupils are doing are in place but the information is not used consistently across the school to ensure that all pupils make the progress they should from year to year. The pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities and those for whom English is an additional

p.4

Grade: 4

language receive appropriate support to help them learn so that they make satisfactory progress.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils' personal development is good. They really enjoy school and take part with enthusiasm in the interesting activities and clubs on offer. Pupils get on extremely well with each other and with adults. They play together sensibly at playtimes in spite of the limited space due the current building work. Pupils concentrate well and behaviour in lessons is good even when teaching is unexciting. Attendance levels have improved and are now satisfactory. Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Displays around school show a good understanding of how people of different cultures live. Pupils are sensitive to the needs of others and have well developed social skills. Regular assemblies and religious education lessons promote spiritual understanding well. Most pupils show a lively spark of enjoyment in everything they do. Pupils have an impressive knowledge of how to lead a healthy life. They

p.5

Grade: 2

participate in a very wide range of sports and have been fully involved in planning healthy lunch menus. They are clear about the dangers of smoking, alcohol and drugs. Pupils are taught how to keep themselves safe through a range of initiatives, such as safe cycling. They contribute positively to the community through charitable fund raising and take on additional responsibility by running the school tuck shop. Pupils' views about the school have been gathered through two surveys. The results have been analysed but pupils have not yet received a summary of the responses.

p.5

Grade: 3

The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory overall and not as good as the school believes it to be. Some teaching, but not enough, is good. In the most effective lessons, teachers have high expectations of what pupils can achieve. They encourage pupils to think things through for themselves and value the ideas and suggestions they contribute. Work is pitched at the right level and builds on what pupils have learned before. In the less successful lessons, teaching does not sufficiently ensure that all pupils' needs are met. The work set, particularly for more able pupils, is often too easy and does not challenge them enough because insufficient account is taken of what pupils already know. Learning support assistants work well with small groups of pupils. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are supported and guided 3 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 16 November 2005 to 17 November 2005

p.5

Grade: 3

well and make satisfactory progress overall. However, assessment information is not being used well enough to improve the progress of more able pupils. Marking of English work helps pupils improve the quality of their writing but marking in other subjects is not as effective.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory. It provides a suitably balanced programme of activities including the opportunity for pupils to learn to play a musical instrument. There is now an increasingly strong emphasis on raising standards in the core subjects that is beginning to have a positive impact on pupils' progress in English and mathematics but less so in science. Pupils develop good skills in subjects such as music, physical education and art and design and the school makes good use of outside expertise, such as specialist music teachers and sports coaches. Planning ensures that the curriculum makes suitable links between subjects. For example, in a Year 3 history lesson, pupils improved their skills in design and technology by designing and making Egyptian jewellery. Homework is used appropriately to enhance pupils' learning and is supported well by parents. The curriculum is enriched by an excellent range of clubs,

p.6

Grade: 3

by visitors to the school as well as annual school trips to France. There is an accomplished school choir and orchestra. The clubs and out of school activities enhance pupils' enjoyment and self-confidence well and promote their participation in sports and the arts effectively.

p.6

Grade: 3

The school provides satisfactory care, guidance and support with some significant strengths. In particular, pastoral and medical care are good. First aid systems are effective. Staff are quick to notice any pupil who is unhappy and help them resolve any problems. Pupils say they have an adult to turn to if they are worried. Risk assessments are completed when necessary, ensuring that children learn in a safe environment. Child protection procedures are in place, although some staff have not attended training on the latest procedures. The school has established strong links with parents who greatly value the broad range of experiences offered to their children. Pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities and those who do not speak English at home are supported well by learning support assistants. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities have suitable targets in their individual education plans and make

p.6

Grade: 3

sound progress towards them. Systems for assessing pupils' progress are used well to identify those pupils who would benefit from additional help but the more able pupils are not given sufficiently challenging targets. 4 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 16 November 2005 to 17 November 2005

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management of the school are satisfactory overall. The daily routines of the school operate well. There is a positive ethos in which staff work well as a team and contribute much to the pupils' good personal development and well-being. Over a period of four years standards in English, mathematics and science have been below average and the pupils made insufficient progress in these subjects. Until recently, insufficient attention was given to raising standards and improving the progress that pupils make. The headteacher has recognised the need for improvement and is re-structuring the senior management team to enable it to focus more rigorously on raising standards and accelerating pupils' progress. However the school's systems to evaluate how well the school is doing lack co-ordination and precision. The headteacher understands that the school should be doing better in meeting the needs and

p.7

Grade: 3

aspirations of all groups of pupils. This is now being addressed. The role of the subject leaders is developing and they are beginning to use data to track how well individual pupils are doing so that weaknesses, such as the lack of challenge and expectation of progress from year to year, are beginning to become apparent and be addressed. However, subject leaders have only recently begun to look in detail at the quality of pupils' work or the quality of teaching within their subject areas. Governors are supportive but their involvement in reviewing how well the school is doing is not rigorous enough. The school's capacity to improve further is satisfactory. 5 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 16 November 2005 to 17 November 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Thorpe Greenways Junior School, 16 November 2005 to 17 November 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 4 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

We enjoyed meeting you and going into your classrooms to talk to you about your work when we visited your school. Everyone was very friendly and polite. Now we want to share with you what we thought about your school. These are the things we thought were good. - You told us that you really enjoy school and we think you do some interesting things. We were really impressed with all the school clubs you go to and we know that many of you are learning to play a musical instrument. - Your behaviour is good in lessons and at playtimes. You play well together in the playground and listen attentively to your teachers. - You told us that you feel safe at school. You trust the staff and say there is always someone to turn to if you have a problem. - Your parents are very pleased that you come to this school. But we know everyone wants to do better and we have suggested a few things that will help. - We think you could be

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

learning more in your lessons and we have asked the teachers to check regularly to make sure that this is happening. - We want the headteacher, staff and governors to collect more information about how your school works to make it more successful.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion