Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Care Hubz in Leeds
Summary
Amy Sims (lead), Saira Rafiq
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Care Hubz
- Inspection date verified
29 Jul 2026
- Inspectors verified
Amy Sims, Saira Rafiq
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2686949
- URN verified
2686949
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2025.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This means they made good progress and formed positive relationships with staff, supporting their feelings of belonging. p.3
- The manager has a good knowledge of the home's strengths and areas for development and is supported by an experienced staff team that ensures the home is a welcoming and nurturing environment for children. p.3
- Staff ensured that the child had clear and consistent boundaries, which helped them to develop skills in managing difficult periods in their life more effectively. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person should ensure that all staff in a care role, including external agency or bank staff, have the qualification in regulation 32 (4) within the relevant timescale listed in regulation 32 (5). p.6
- The registered person should actively seek independent scrutiny of the home and make best use of information from independent and internal monitoring (including under regulations 44 and 45) to ensure continuous improvement. p.6
- They should be skilled in anticipating difficulties and reviewing incidents. p.6
- They are responsible for proactively implementing lessons learned and sustaining good practice. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development5
“Supervision sessions are held monthly and are effective.” p.4Leadership & governance4
“The manager has good oversight of the home and knows her staff team well.” p.4Parents & families2
“Staff have maintained positive relationships with the child's family.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,055
- shorter than usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children's home: 2686949 1 Registered provider: Care Hubz Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children's home
This home is run by a private provider. It provides care for one child who may experience social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children's home
At the time of the inspection, the child had moved out, so no children were living in the home. The inspector spoke with the child during the inspection.
p.1
Information about this children's home
The manager registered with Ofsted in July 2024.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children's home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children's home: 2686949 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
17/06/2025 Full Good 03/07/2024 Full Good 03/05/2023 Full Requires improvement to be good Inspection report for children's home: 2686949 3
p.2
Summary of findings
The child benefited from consistency and stability in their home for a long period of time. This means they made good progress and formed positive relationships with staff, supporting their feelings of belonging. The child has recently moved on from the home to begin their independence journey.
p.3
Summary of findings
The child experienced some difficult feelings, which meant that there was an increase in incidents. The child was supported by experienced staff who provided a good level of care to ensure that the child did not experience harm.
p.3
Summary of findings
The manager knows the child well. The manager has a good knowledge of the home's strengths and areas for development and is supported by an experienced staff team that ensures the home is a welcoming and nurturing environment for children.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child who was living in the home has made good progress in most areas of their life. This is because of the stability and nurturing care that they have received. Staff have worked hard to build positive relationships with the child and provide predictable and safe care. Staff ensured that the child had clear and consistent boundaries, which helped them to develop skills in managing difficult periods in their life more effectively.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff and leaders made significant efforts to support the child's education. Where there were difficulties with accessing further education, staff supported the child to seek employment within the local community and to attend interviews independently. This has supported the child's ongoing training and educational development needs.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child's voice is captured well within direct work, and their daily experiences shine through. The child has now left the home, but through observations of these conversations between the child and staff, it is clear that the child was able to speak freely and openly to staff and was able to share their wishes and feelings without worry.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff have maintained positive relationships with the child's family. Staff recognise how important family time is for the child and help facilitate this so the child can spend time with those who are important to them.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child's move out of the home happened quickly. The child said, 'They didn't tell me until the day before.' Records demonstrate that the child was supported with moving on and staff supported with planning for this. Staff have supported the child in their new home and continue to offer outreach support when necessary. Inspection report for children's home: 2686949 4
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
While there had been an escalation in incidents, staff understood the child's needs and knew them well. Staff recognised when the child presented in distress and provided them the support that they needed. De-escalation techniques were used in line with the child's plans. Staff had a good understanding of specific triggers that caused the child distress. The manager had oversight of incidents for the child and provided a reflective analysis.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff were responsive to substance misuse issues. They made attempts to discuss the issues and offer direct work to support reflective discussions and learning. The child was not always receptive to discussions, but they continued to be a theme in direct work sessions. Staff were understanding of the child's risks and vulnerabilities, which helped them provide the right support.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Managers followed safeguarding procedures appropriately and referred concerns to relevant agencies. Allegations and concerns about staff were investigated thoroughly and were appropriate and proportionate. When risks to the child had been identified, managers took action to reduce the risk of harm.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff completed appropriate risk assessments. The risk assessments were specific and meaningful and provided clear guidance on how staff should respond at different stages.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager has good oversight of the home and knows her staff team well. She is open in her approach, and staff feel supported. The manager leads a stable staff team that is committed to providing good-quality care to children in their care.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager knows the strengths and weaknesses of the home and has plans in place to support the home's future development. The manager upskills her staff within team meetings, and staff have their own areas of expertise to deliver training to other staff, supporting their feelings of being valued members of staff.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager of the home ensures that there is good multi-agency communication. When the child was living in the home, there was evidence of regular consultation with professionals to ensure that plans were reviewed and kept up to date in line with the child's needs, wishes and feelings.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Supervision sessions are held monthly and are effective. They are reflective and purposeful, and staff say that they benefit from them. Staff have access to a training calendar and feel supported to undertake their job roles. However, some staff have not gained the relevant qualifications within timescales.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Systems for the monitoring and review of the home are not always effective. Although the manager demonstrates a good understanding of the home's strengths and areas for Inspection report for children's home: 2686949 5 development, this is not always captured through a structured and effective auditing system. This increases the risk that shortfalls may not be identified promptly. The quality-of-care reviews have not been sent to Ofsted in a timely manner. Inspection report for children's home: 2686949 6
p.4
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that all staff in a care role, including external agency or bank staff, have the qualification in regulation 32 (4) within the relevant timescale listed in regulation 32 (5). ('Guide to the Children's Homes Regulations, including the quality standards', page 53, paragraph 10.12) The registered person should actively seek independent scrutiny of the home and make best use of information from independent and internal monitoring (including under regulations 44 and 45) to ensure continuous improvement. They should be skilled in anticipating difficulties and reviewing incidents. They are responsible for proactively implementing lessons learned and sustaining good practice. ('Guide to the Children's Homes Regulations, including the quality standards', page 55, paragraph 10.24)
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the 'Guide to the Children's Homes Regulations, including the quality standards'. Inspection report for children's home: 2686949 7
p.6
Children's home details
Registered provider address: Thorpe House, 61 Richardshaw Lane, Stanningley, Pudsey LS28 7EL
p.7
Inspectors
Amy Sims, Social Care Inspector Saira Rafiq, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children's home: 2686949 8 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspectors
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion