Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Care Hubz in Leeds
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Care Hubz Limited
- Inspection date verified
18 Jun 2025
- Inspectors verified
Deirdre Silkstone
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2686949
- URN verified
2686949
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person should ensure that a meaningful quality of care review report is carried out. p.5
- In particular, ensure that the feedback and opinions of children, their parents, placing authorities and staff are ascertained and considered in the manager’s review of the quality of care. p.5
- Also, the report should clearly identify any actions required for the next six months of delivery in the home and how those actions will be addressed. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development4
“Supervision sessions, appraisals and team meetings are effective.” p.4Parents & families3
“The staff maintain good relationships with the child’s family.” p.3Care & placements3
“Staff are proactive when the child goes missing from home.” p.4Teaching & assessment2
“The child’s risk assessments include their known and presenting risks.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 967
- shorter than usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2686949 1 Registered provider: Care Hubz Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home is run by a private provider. It offers care for one child who may experience social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of the inspection, one child was living at the home. The inspector spoke with the child during the inspection.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager registered with Ofsted in July 2024.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2686949 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
03/07/2024 Full Good 03/05/2023 Full Requires improvement to be good Inspection report for children’s home: 2686949 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child has made substantial progress since they moved to the home. Their positive relationships with the staff have enabled them to achieve this. The staff’s nurturing, consistent and caring approach supports stability for the child and has significantly contributed to them feeling safe and at home.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
All routine welfare needs for the child are met. The staff understand the child’s specific health needs and how they can affect their behaviour. The staff have adapted their practice and the child’s routine around these health needs, which has provided the child with predictability where possible. This conveys that the child’s needs are at the centre of the staff’s care.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child is making progress in education. The staff encourage the child to participate and learn, which has contributed to them significantly improving their attendance at school. The child has recently completed GCSEs and is now focusing on the next stage of education. The staff have identified and discussed several options with the child that would best meet their needs.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The staff maintain good relationships with the child’s family. The staff understand how important family is to the child, so they promote and nurture these connections and actively facilitate their time together.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child is consistently encouraged to express their views. Although there are no formal children’s meetings, the staff encourage the child to share their opinions daily by talking to them. Any wishes or requests are then shared, discussed and actioned by the team where appropriate. This demonstrates to the child that their views are valued and heard.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Although there has been an increase in safeguarding incidents recently, staff have responded quickly and consistently to ensure that the child is safe. The staff are professionally inquisitive around the sudden increase in incidents to understand and assist the child with the causes for it. They talk to the child about what happened, what could be done differently next time, and how they can best keep themselves safe.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The child’s risk assessments include their known and presenting risks. These documents identify clear actions and strategies for staff to follow to reduce the child’s risks. The assessments are updated as and when the child’s needs change.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The staff persistently work with the child to reduce substance misuse. Although this is a problematic aspect of the child’s life, the staff have regular conversations and find creative ways to support the child in learning about the dangers of such behaviours. The staff collaborate with police and substance misuse professionals and undertake specific Inspection report for children’s home: 2686949 4 training on the subject to equip themselves with the knowledge to better support the child.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff are proactive when the child goes missing from home. They promptly act and search for the child until they find them. The police are only contacted when necessary and to ensure that the child returns home safely. Independent return home interviews take place as they should, and the manager takes action to ensure that learning is taken from them, which informs future planning.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The child knows how to make a complaint. They understand the complaints process and how to make certain their voice is heard. The manager takes any complaints seriously and promptly addresses them. This reassures the child that their voice is heard and that their safety and well-being are prioritised.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager is tenacious and committed to the child and the staff in the home. They lead by example and care about the progress of the staff as well as the child. The manager has allocated the staff to champion specific areas of the child’s care and encourages them to be part of care planning decisions. This directly contributes to the staff feeling included and valued.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager clearly understands the child’s needs and what they need to make progress. The manager confidently advocates for the child and challenges appropriately when necessary. This demonstrates the manager’s commitment to the child’s well-being.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Supervision sessions, appraisals and team meetings are effective. They focus on staff development, include practice reflection, and prioritise the child in their discussions. Sessions provide staff with the opportunity to improve their practice so they can achieve the best care, support and outcomes for the child.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff training is up to date and in line with the organisation’s requirements. When necessary, additional training is sourced based on the child’s specific needs. This provides the staff with a better understanding of needs and positively impacts how they can best support them.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager’s review of the quality of care requires further work. The review includes good evaluations of the child’s progress but does not incorporate feedback from the children and stakeholders. An action plan is also missing from the review. This limits how the manager can make future improvements to the child’s lives and their home. Inspection report for children’s home: 2686949 5
p.4
Recommendation
The registered person should ensure that a meaningful quality of care review report is carried out. In particular, ensure that the feedback and opinions of children, their parents, placing authorities and staff are ascertained and considered in the manager’s review of the quality of care. Also, the report should clearly identify any actions required for the next six months of delivery in the home and how those actions will be addressed. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 64, paragraph 15.4)
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2686949 6
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Thorpe House, 61 Richardshaw Lane, Stanningley, Pudsey, Leeds LS28 7EL
p.6
Inspector
Deirdre Silkstone, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2686949 7 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion