Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Best Practice Network

Inspected 19 Jun 2025 · URN 2679896

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lydia Pride (lead), Aliki Constantopoulou, Lynne Williams, Paul Halcro, Rachel Henrick

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Jun 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Aliki Constantopoulou, Lydia Pride, Lynne Williams, Paul Halcro, Rachel Henrick

  • Postcode verified

    BS1 1LT

  • Name on report verified

    Best Practice Network

  • URN verified

    2679896

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+90Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenthighly skilledexceptionallyoutstandinghigh-qualityambitiouseffectivesuccessfully
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
723
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%About the inspection 39%

Full report text

Best Practice Network 27-29 Newminster House, Baldwin Street, Bristol BS1 1LT

p.1

Overall effectiveness Outstanding

The quality of professional development and training Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Outstanding

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding

p.1

provider?

The Best Practice Network ECF programme takes careful account of the prior knowledge and experience of ECTs. Expert facilitators and skilful mentors meticulously support ECTs in identifying areas where they need to do more to embed effective practice fully. Once secure, ECTs access high-quality resources to enhance their knowledge even further. This helps to ensure that ECTs teach with increasing confidence and impact over time. They undertake valuable action research and visits to other schools, gaining deep insights into chosen themes. This helps ECTs to positively influence practice in their own schools and develop ambitious career aspirations.

p.1

provider?

ECTs report very high levels of satisfaction with all aspects of the programme. They benefit from consistently effective mentoring, which helps them to be very successful in the different subjects and phases they teach. Expertly designed case studies help ECTs to become highly skilled in meeting the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). ECTs learn to manage their workload and maintain their well-being well. Well-established channels of communication enable ECTs to receive timely and precise support with any difficulties. School leaders remark upon the positive difference the programme makes to the recruitment and retention of highly skilled teachers in their local areas.

p.1

Information about this lead provider

◼ There are 4,579 ECTs currently following the Best Practice Network ECF programme. ◼ The vast majority of ECTs learn with one of 36 delivery partners. Best Practice Network provides the ECF programme directly to 211 ECTs. ◼ Delivery partners include teaching school hubs, multi-academy trusts and schools.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ The inspection was carried out by five of His Majesty’s Inspectors. Inspection activities were undertaken on site and through a mix of in-person and online visits to delivery partners. ◼ Inspectors met with the managing director, the director of quality and compliance, the ECF programme director and ECF programme lead, leaders and managers of partnerships, operations and e-learning at the lead provider, and four members of the advisory board. ◼ Inspectors visited nine delivery partners, including two online visits. Inspectors also sampled an additional four delivery partners. ◼ Inspectors carried out nine focused reviews. For each focused review, inspectors held discussions with delivery partner leaders and facilitators, spoke to ECTs, spoke to school leaders, mentors and induction tutors, and considered any appropriate documentation. ◼ Inspectors considered responses to the Ofsted surveys for ECTs, mentors, school

p.2

Information about this inspection

leaders and delivery partners when making their judgements.

p.2

better?

The Best Practice Network ECF programme is expertly designed to equip ECTs with the knowledge and skills they need to ensure that every child receives an excellent education, regardless of their background. As such, the curriculum draws upon a wide range of case studies, including exposing ECTs to different special educational needs and disabilities. This helps ECTs to deepen their understanding of how teaching can be adapted to meet a wide range of needs. Over the course of the programme, ECTs encounter a rich wealth of examples to help them successfully apply their learning to their context. They also learn to apply the same principles expertly to less familiar contexts.

p.2

better?

Coverage of the ECF is comprehensive. The lead provider has made well-judged decisions about how and when ECTs will revisit important learning. For example, ECTs successfully build on their initial teacher training experience, revisiting the key learning and pertinent research during Year 1. In Year 2, ECTs achieve a more sophisticated understanding. They undertake well-thought-out action research, visit new settings and collaborate with colleagues working in other subjects and phases. School leaders remark upon the confident way that ECTs apply their professional learning in practice.

p.2

better?

Training facilitators are highly experienced school leaders. The training provided to them is exceptionally strong. Facilitators go to great lengths to champion and provide support for ECTs. For example, facilitators on the direct delivery programme recognise that ECTs on this route may not belong to a local network. They provide valuable additional opportunities for meeting up online.

p.3

better?

Mentor training is excellent. It includes precise guidance to support a cycle of reflection in which ECTs focus sharply on identifying where their knowledge is secure and where they would benefit from further work. Highly experienced mentors direct ECTs’ learning precisely where it will make the most difference to their practice. They get to know their ECTs very well. Where an ECT is closer to mastery of one or more of the standards due to sustained, relevant experience working in education, mentors work with the lead provider to meticulously tailor the programme.

p.3

better?

Leaders pride themselves on high-quality relationships with delivery partners. An ambitious vision for what ECTs will learn and how mentors and facilitators will contribute to their success is tenaciously embedded across the partnership. Self-evaluation is rigorously built into day-to-day working practices. Leaders are highly responsive to feedback from stakeholders, showing great agility in making swift changes, for example, to reduce workload demands for ECTs and their mentors.

p.3

better?

There are well-considered arrangements in place for reporting welfare concerns. Best Practice Network is very considerate of the mental health and well-being of ECTs and mentors. Excellent resources in the enrichment library provide expert support and guidance for participants. As a result of this programme, ECTs are exceptionally well- prepared teaching professionals.

p.3

Lead provider details

This inspection was carried out by His Majesty’s Inspectors (HMIs) in accordance with the early career framework (ECF) and national professional qualification (NPQ) framework and handbook .

p.4

Lead provider details

The framework and handbook set out the statutory basis for ECF and NPQ inspections in England.

p.4

Lead provider details

Lead provider programmes offered ECF and NPQ Date of previous inspection 22 to 25 May 2023

p.4

Inspection team

Lydia Pride, lead inspector HMI Aliki Constantopoulou HMI Paul Halcro HMI Rachel Henrick HMI Lynne Williams HMI guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.5

Inspection team

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion