Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Best Practice Network

Inspected 13 Jun 2024 · published 7 Aug 2024 · URN 2679896

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Jun 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Alison Aitchison, Amanda Downing, Eve Morris, Kristian Hewitt, Mark Anderson, Paul James, Sam Hainey

  • Postcode verified

    BS1 1LT

  • Name on report verified

    Best Practice Network

  • URN verified

    2679896

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+91Very positivemore positive than 94% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongexceptionallyhigh-qualityhighly effectiveoutstandingconsistentlywell supportedhigh quality
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
876
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%About the inspection 38%

Full report text

National professional qualifications (NPQ) report

p.1

Best Practice Network 27–29 Newminster House, Baldwin Street, Bristol BS1 1LT

p.1

Inspection judgements

National professional qualifications (NPQs) inspection

p.1

Overall effectiveness Outstanding

The quality of professional development and training Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Outstanding

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection N/A

p.1

What is it like to be an NPQ participant at this lead provider?

At Best Practice Network, participants are effusive about the quality of the training and support that they receive across all NPQ programmes. The lead provider’s delivery model is accessible, carefully designed and expertly delivered. This allows participants to continually assess, develop and deepen their own prior knowledge while learning and applying new skills and practices that challenge them out of their comfort zone. Participants value the remarkable impact that this has when leading improvements in their own schools. They are exceptionally well prepared for the next stages of their careers.

p.1

What is it like to be an NPQ participant at this lead provider?

Facilitators and coaches actively engage with participants as part of all NPQ programmes. Participants are constantly supported to collaborate with others, reflect on their own progress and act on personalised feedback in the context of their own settings. This enables participants to progressively enhance their knowledge and skills in a safe environment. They welcome external challenge, build their confidence and explore new perspectives to their advantage.

p.1

What is it like to be an NPQ participant at this lead provider?

The lead provider places a high priority on ensuring a positive experience for all participants. For example, it ensures that resources are of a high quality, user-friendly and rooted in relevant research. Participants feel valued. Leaders continually seek and act on their feedback in order to make adaptations and enhancements to the courses. This helps participants to access everything that they need in a timely way that fits with their wide- ranging commitments.

p.1

Information about this lead provider

◼ Best Practice Network is currently delivering training to 11,095 NPQ participants across the six different NPQ qualifications that it offers as a lead provider. ◼ The lead provider has a national network of 56 delivery partners that include schools, teaching school hubs, multi-academy trusts and other educational establishments. ◼ Best Practice Network provides direct delivery to 2,190 participants.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ This inspection was carried out by six of His Majesty’s Inspectors and one Ofsted inspector. The inspection was carried out through in-person meetings, online meetings and on-site visits. ◼ Inspectors met with the lead provider’s representatives, including the quality director, the NPQ director, members of the partnerships team and senior facilitators. The lead inspector also met with representatives of the Best Practice Network advisory board, the managing director of Best Practice Network and the chair of the supporting education group (SEG) board. ◼ Inspectors carried out focused reviews in all six of the NPQ programmes offered at the time of the inspection. Twelve focused reviews were carried out in total. For each focused review, inspectors met with delivery partner leaders and facilitators, discussed training with groups of participants, met with headteachers and senior leaders from participants’ schools and educational settings, reviewed

p.2

Information about this inspection

the exemplified training materials and scrutinised a range of documentation. Two inspectors also visited two different live training events in person. In total, inspectors visited 10 delivery partners, either on-site or online. ◼ The inspection team considered responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for NPQ participants, delivery partners and school leaders.

p.2

better?

At Best Practice Network, there is a steadfast commitment to ‘strive for excellence’ with a clear and unwavering focus on participants’ success. This values-based vision is shared, embedded and clearly understood by all members of the workforce and all delivery partners. This creates strong centralised systems of collaboration and communication and ensures that all participants receive a consistently high-quality experience across all programmes and geographical areas. The content of each programme is meticulously designed and structured, highly ambitious and faithful to the relevant NPQ framework.

p.2

better?

Formative assessment tasks are rigorous, and they link pertinent research into real-life practice. They are personalised to participants’ starting points and contexts. For example, in each task, participants are skilfully coached to tackle areas of insecurity in their particular knowledge and skills. They purposefully plan, practise, and implement their learning, and they receive helpful, targeted feedback. In doing so, participants deepen their understanding and develop agile leadership behaviours.

p.2

better?

Participants are exceptionally well supported to reflect on and develop their learning using additional mentors and coaches. These mentors and coaches are acutely aware of participants’ strengths and areas for development. Together with facilitators, they expertly guide participants, enabling them to contextualise and apply their learning confidently in their own professional setting. The lead provider ensures that its exacting standards are upheld through the skilful recruitment, training and retention of experienced and expert mentors and coaches. As a result, participants become highly self-aware, and they rapidly acquire the skills and knowledge that they need to become effective in their roles.

p.3

better?

Delivery partners appreciate the high levels of support that the lead provider offers. They share a strong sense of mutual trust. Best Practice Network deliberately operates many systems centrally to ensure consistency of approach and to take the strain of organisational commitments. This allows partners to focus on high-quality delivery. Partners value the reciprocal and consultative relationship that they have with the lead provider. For example, many delivery partner leaders are representatives on the Best Practice Network advisory board. Here they consult and influence the design and delivery of NPQ programmes. They appreciate the opportunities that this provides for them to network with partners nationally, share good practice and benefit the education system more widely for pupils.

p.3

better?

Leaders are tenacious and relentless in their commitment to securing continual improvement. They consult widely and regularly with all stakeholders and act promptly on the feedback that they receive. For example, following participant feedback, considerable resources have been designated to ensure that online systems can be navigated with ease and that induction materials are continually reviewed to ensure accessibility for all. Participants feel extremely well supported with workload and time management.

p.3

better?

Best Practice Network employs strong processes to monitor, evaluate and maintain a consistently high level of programme effectiveness. Leaders design and use highly effective diagnostic tools to check on the quality of professional development and training. This information is shared with delivery partners so that they can use it collaboratively to shape future delivery. Dedicated staff carry out frequent visits to training sessions, and they provide strong support to improve delivery when necessary.

p.3

better?

Leaders and managers at all levels demonstrate a strong understanding of their statutory responsibilities, including in relation to safeguarding, equality and diversity. The designated safeguarding lead maintains detailed records and a strong strategic oversight to ensure compliance in this area and provide high levels of support. All stakeholders are clear about how to report safeguarding concerns and can do so through various channels.

p.3

Lead provider details

Unique reference number 2679896 Inspection number 10326120

p.4

Lead provider details

This inspection was carried out by His Majesty’s Inspectors (HMIs) and Ofsted Inspectors (OIs) in accordance with early career framework (ECF) and national professional qualification (NPQ) framework and handbook .

p.4

Lead provider details

The framework and handbook set out the statutory basis for ECF and NPQ inspections in England.

p.4

Lead provider details

Lead provider programmes offered ECF and NPQ Date of previous inspection N/A

p.4

Inspection team

Amanda Downing, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.4

Inspection team

Alison Aitchison His Majesty’s Inspector Mark Anderson His Majesty’s Inspector Sam Hainey His Majesty’s Inspector Kristian Hewitt Ofsted Inspector Paul James His Majesty’s Inspector Eve Morris His Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.5

Inspection team

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion