Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Best Practice Network

Inspected 25 May 2023 · published 12 Jul 2023 · URN 2679896

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 May 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Alice Clay, Damian Loneragan, Donna Briggs, Harry Ingham, Janette Walker, Marcus Newby, Rakesh Patel

  • Postcode verified

    BS1 1LT

  • Name on report verified

    Best Practice Network

  • URN verified

    2679896

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+83Very positivemore positive than 86% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectivehigh-qualityambitiousexceptionallyoutstandingthrivestrongextremely
Criticismweaknessesconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
738
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%About the inspection 43%

Full report text

Best Practice Network Newminster House 27–29 Baldwin Street Bristol BS1 1LT

p.1

Outstanding

The quality of professional development and training Outstanding

p.1

Outstanding

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection N/A

p.1

provider?

ECTs gain the extensive knowledge and skills they need to thrive in the early stages of their teaching careers. This is because the lead provider prioritises the development needs and starting points of individual ECTs and their mentors, ensuring that the programme is tailored exceptionally well.

p.1

provider?

ECTs study an ambitious and expertly designed curriculum. Specialist facilitators forge strong links between this curriculum and mentor training. From early in the programme, ECTs learn the importance of effective pupil relationships and behaviour strategies. In the second year of their programme, ECTs are guided to use action research skills expertly. This enables them to become highly reflective practitioners who are extremely well- prepared for the realities of teaching.

p.1

provider?

Enhancements, such as visits to other schools, positively impact on ECTs’ classroom practice. They access and use well-thought-out materials, which purposefully link to the phase and subject that they teach. For example, all ECTs learn that ‘they are teachers of literacy’. Through meticulously sequenced sessions and high-quality self-study materials, they understand the importance of using a systematic synthetic approach for phonics and the impact of teaching important vocabulary to pupils. ECTs benefit from the high-quality pastoral support offered by the lead provider, as well as within their delivery partnership. As a result, ECTs are more than ready for the next steps in their career.

p.1

Information about this lead provider

◼ There are 6070 ECTs undertaking the lead provider’s ECF programme. Of these, 3336 are in their first year of the programme and 2734 are in their second year of the programme. ◼ Best Practice Network works with 36 delivery partners, who deliver training to 5428 ECTs. ◼ The lead provider works with a range of delivery partners. This includes teaching school hubs, multi-academy trusts and other education establishments. ◼ Best Practice Network provides direct delivery to 642 ECTs.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ The inspection was completed by seven of His Majesty’s Inspectors. The inspection was carried out through in-person meetings, on-site and online visits to delivery partners. ◼ Inspectors spoke with the lead provider’s representatives, including the managing director, the director of ECF, the head of quality and safeguarding, the head of partnerships, the e-learning manager and senior facilitators. The lead inspector also met with representatives of governance from the advisory board and SEG group. ◼ Inspectors visited 10 delivery partners on site and two delivery partners remotely. A further four delivery partners were spoken with as part of the inspection. The direct delivery national group were also spoken with. ◼ Inspectors carried out 13 focused reviews as part of the ECF programme, within the primary and secondary programmes. For each focused review, inspectors met with delivery partner leaders and facilitators, discussed training with a group of

p.2

Information about this inspection

mentors and ECTs, met with headteachers and induction tutors, watched online training, reviewed exemplified training materials and scrutinised documentation. Inspectors also attended live training events. ◼ Inspectors took into account responses to the Ofsted surveys for ECTs, mentors, school leaders and delivery partners when making their judgements.

p.2

better?

At Best Practice Network, leaders’ values to ‘strive for excellence’ and ‘inspire learning’ are fully realised. Delivery partners are proud to work with the lead provider and feel valued. Leaders seek the views of stakeholders regularly to ensure that they continue to sustain a high-quality programme. For example, this feedback has led to well-written case studies that thoughtfully support ECTs and mentors within their phase. Governors routinely check the impact of leaders’ work.

p.2

better?

Leaders are tenacious in their approach to continuing programme improvements. They have clear systems to quality assure impact. To complement the frequent checks on effectiveness, leaders also provide regular briefings and surgeries to support all stakeholders in their work. They care deeply about the workload and well-being of ECTs and mentors. They do what they can to streamline systems. As a result of these checks and support, ECTs understand how to manage their own workload.

p.3

better?

Leaders have designed a well-connected curriculum for ECTs and mentors. They ensure that they maintain fidelity to the ECF, while making deliberate and well-considered sequencing choices. For example, irrespective of when ECTs start during the year, they learn quickly how to manage approaches to behaviour. As a result of this ambitious curriculum, ECTs deepen the knowledge and skills that they need to be highly effective practitioners.

p.3

better?

Enhancements, along with leaders’ approach to wider reading and ‘inquiry’, complement the programme further. For example, ECTs in year two of their programme engage in research linked to their subject and phase with high levels of critical reflection. Facilitators and mentors expertly guide these ECTs in this work, so there are demonstrable improvements to their teaching. Some headteachers commented that this work is ‘invaluable’ and develops ‘highly resilient’ ECTs.

p.3

better?

The lead provider, through their well-thought-out systems and meticulously planned curriculum, ensures that ECTs have a sharp and accurate view of their strengths and weaknesses. ‘Module audits’ perform an important role within this. ECTs are well guided in using these audits to build on prior knowledge and celebrate their successes. Facilitators diligently use what they know about ECTs and mentors to adapt future training and support. This is because the work of the lead provider ensures that facilitators are skilled and have expert knowledge.

p.3

better?

Leaders identify mentors’ roles and responsibilities. They share these with their partners clearly. Mentors attend highly effective training, which includes successful coaching strategies. Most mentors who responded to the Ofsted survey shared that they have high levels of confidence in their roles because of this work. They say that they are fully prepared with the knowledge and skills they need to support ECTs highly effectively.

p.3

better?

Leaders fully understand their statutory responsibilities, including safeguarding, equality and inclusion. Staff are trained to support ECTs if they raise any concerns. The lead provider works diligently to offer thoughtful modifications to support disabilities.

p.3

Lead provider details

This inspection was carried out by His Majesty’s Inspectors (HMIs) in accordance with the early career framework (ECF) and national professional qualification (NPQ) framework and handbook .

p.4

Lead provider details

The framework and handbook set out the statutory basis for ECF and NPQ inspections in England.

p.4

Lead provider details

Lead provider programmes offered ECF and NPQ Date of previous inspection N/A

p.4

Inspection team

Donna Briggs, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.4

Inspection team

Harry Ingham Senior His Majesty’s Inspector

p.4

Inspection team

Damian Loneragan His Majesty’s Inspector

p.4

Inspection team

Rakesh Patel His Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.5

Inspection team

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion