Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Seedlings Pre School

Inspected 18 Jun 2025 · published 30 Jul 2025 · URN 2655479

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Joanne Steward (lead), Sarah Madge

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Seedlings Pre-School Limited

  • Group reference verified

    RP523467

  • Inspection date AI-checked

    18 Jun 2025

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Joanne Steward, Sarah Madge

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    PL9 9RG

  • Name on report verified

    Seedlings Pre School

  • URN verified

    2655479

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2025.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−47Criticalmore positive than 34% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisenurturingmake good progresspositiveenjoysensitiveconsistentlyeffectivelyeffective
Criticismconcernsnot effectivedo not knowbreachesat risknot effectivelyinconsistenciesnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings973w−60
  • Safeguarding296w−13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,235
longer than usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 51
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 1
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Safeguarding 16%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of Seedlings Pre School Seedlings Pre School, 40 Hooe Road, Plymouth PL9 9RG

p.1

Inspection date: 18 June 2025 - 26 June 2025

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Leaders with designated safeguarding roles do not demonstrate sufficient knowledge and understanding to fulfil their responsibilities and implement the local safeguarding partnership's (LSP) procedures. As a result, they do not take appropriate action to protect children's welfare. Some staff do not supervise children sufficiently and do not recognise potential hazards in the environment, such as unhygienic and unsuitable items that children may place in their mouth. Leaders do not monitor staff's practice effectively enough. This means they do not have an accurate oversight of the setting and do not ensure that any improvements are sustained.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Leaders do not plan and provide a curriculum that helps children to make good progress in their learning, including for their communication and language development. Although the curriculum has been reviewed recently, staff do not build on children's knowledge and skills. Inconsistencies in staff's support for children's speech mean that some children do not receive encouragement to share their thoughts. Staff do not provide effective support for all children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). At times, these children wander around alone and staff do not provide any purposeful engagement to extend their learning. Some staff do not know the babies well, so the younger children are unsettled and upset.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Partnerships with parents and other settings that children attend are not effective. Leaders and staff do not implement a consistent two-way approach to children's learning and development.

p.2

need to do better?

n Leaders do not identify significant weaknesses in the setting or take sufficient action to make improvements when breaches of requirements are identified by inspectors. For example, those with lead safeguarding roles do not understand the threshold for when to take further action when concerns arise about children. Additionally, they do not follow the organisation's procedures to share all safeguarding concerns about children with the relevant individuals and agencies in a timely manner. Despite this being raised by inspectors, those with lead safeguarding roles continued to delay the sharing of information with safeguarding partners. This is because they prioritised other tasks, such as covering for staff who are unwell. This places children at risk of harm. n Those with lead safeguarding roles do not know when to refer concerns about staff conduct to the local authority designated officer. This means they do not

p.2

need to do better?

follow the organisation's and the LSP's procedures to protect children and keep them safe.

p.2

need to do better?

18 June 2025 n Despite actions being previously raised to improve staff's supervision of children, staff still do not supervise children well. They are unaware of what the children are doing around them and what hazards are in the environment that may pose a risk to children. For example, two-year-old and pre-school children drink soapy water and pour jugs of water over their peers' head, which the staff supporting the water activities do not notice. Leaders have provided some training regarding staff deployment, but it has not been sufficient to drive and sustain improvements in staff's practice. n Overall, staff form positive relationships with children. Toddlers and older children approach staff for cuddles and enjoy sitting on their lap to listen to a story. However, staff do not always provide babies with sensitive and nurturing interactions. For instance, staff do not communicate with babies when they

p.2

need to do better?

remove them from their play to have their care needs met, which causes some babies to become upset and distressed. Babies' emotional development is not well supported. n Leaders and staff plan some strategies to support children with SEND. For example, they take children to the sensory room where they can relax in a calm environment. However, there are long periods when some pre-school children with SEND go unnoticed and wander around without support or attention from staff. Staff do not provide them with consistent interactions to meet their individual needs and support their learning. n Due to the high staff turnover, parents do not know who their child's key person is and do not receive sufficient information from staff about their child's experiences at the setting. Furthermore, where children attend more than one setting, staff do not exchange information with every setting about the children. This does not provide a consistent approach to children's education and means

p.3

need to do better?

that staff do not work with parents and other professionals to extend children's learning. n Leaders are clear about what they want children to learn at the setting. However, staff do not implement the curriculum effectively or consistently, so children do not receive sufficient challenge to extend their learning. For example, while learning about animals, staff ask pre-school children questions that they already know the answers to and do not teach them anything new. Staff plan an activity to help toddlers learn about emotions but do not talk to the children about feelings. Weaknesses in the delivery of the curriculum mean that staff do not build on children's prior learning. n The setting provides children with nutritious snacks and meals to benefit children's health. Staff are aware of children with allergies and intolerances. Following a recent incident relating to children's dietary needs, leaders took

p.3

need to do better?

action to put this right and to reduce the likelihood of a reoccurrence. n Staff use signing with young children to help them to communicate their needs before they learn to talk. For example, babies learn how to move their hands to sign 'more'. However, the two-year-old and pre-school room is excessively loud and chaotic. Staff shout over the noise to make themselves heard, and children find it difficult to hear staff and one another. Additionally, staff do not engage children in two-way discussions that support children's speech development.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.

p.4

Due date

ensure any concerns about children's welfare are reported promptly to local safeguarding agencies to ensure their safety 20/06/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure all those with lead safeguarding roles understand the LSP's thresholds and know how and when to take action when safeguarding concerns are identified 09/07/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure all those with lead safeguarding roles understand their responsibilities to prioritise safeguarding matters 09/07/2025

p.4

Due date

improve the knowledge and understanding of all those with lead safeguarding roles to ensure they follow the organisation's and LSP's procedures for reporting any concerns about staff to the relevant agencies 09/07/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure staff are supported, coached and mentored to help them supervise children effectively to meet their individual needs 20/06/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure all adults working with children understand how to identify hazards within the environment and are alert to the risks they may pose to children 09/07/2025

p.4

Due date

18 June 2025 ensure relationships with babies are sensitive and nurturing and meet their individual needs to help them feel settled and secure 20/06/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure there are effective strategies in place to meet the needs of children with SEND 09/07/2025

p.5

Due date

improve the sharing of information with parents and other settings that children attend to provide a consistent two-way approach to benefit children's development 09/07/2025

p.5

Due date

improve the implementation of the curriculum to ensure it provides children with appropriate challenge that builds on what children already know and can do and what they need to learn next 16/07/2025

p.5

Due date

improve the planning and delivery of the communication and language programme in the two-year-old and pre- school rooms, including the quality of staff's interactions with children, to ensure children can hear staff and one another to develop their speech and thinking skills. 16/07/2025

p.5

Setting details

Unique reference number 2655479 Local authority Plymouth Inspection number 10408686 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Sessional day care

p.6

inspection

Total number of places 99 Number of children on roll 176 Name of registered person Seedlings Pre-School Limited

p.6

reference number

Telephone number 01752971780 Date of previous inspection 18 March 2025

p.6

Information about this early years setting

Seedlings Pre School registered at the present site in 2022 and is located in Hooe, Plymouth, Devon. It is open Monday to Friday, from 7.30am to 6pm, for 52 weeks of the year, excluding the Christmas holidays. There are 35 staff members. One staff member holds a level 7 qualification, nine staff hold a level 6 qualification and 10 members of staff have level 3 qualifications. Three staff are qualified at level 2 and nine staff are unqualified. There are also two housekeepers and one chef. The setting offers government-funded childcare places.

p.6

Inspection activities

n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n The inspection started on 18 June 2025. An inspector returned on 26 June 2025 to gather additional evidence in line with Ofsted inspections and visits: Deferring, pausing and gathering additional evidence policy. n The deputy manager, manager and the lead inspector completed a learning walk together of all areas of the setting and discussed the early years curriculum. n The inspectors engaged with and spoke to children to find out about their time at the setting. n The inspectors spoke with leaders about how they manage the setting. n The inspectors observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspectors carried out joint observations of group activities with leaders. n Parents, grandparents and carers shared their views of the setting with the

p.7

Inspection activities

inspectors. n The inspectors looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the suitability of staff working in the setting.

p.7

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.7

Inspection activities

18 June 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.8

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion