Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Seedlings Pre School
Summary
Victoria Nicolson (lead), Rebecca Hayday
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Seedlings Pre-School Limited
- Group reference verified
RP523467
- Inspection date verified
18 Mar 2025
- Inspectors AI-checked
Rebecca Hayday, Victoria Nicolson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
PL9 9RG
- Name on report verified
Seedlings Pre School
- URN verified
2655479
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The poor deployment of staff means that they do not notice when children are at risk of falling from high walls or when children access other areas that are not safe. p.2
- The support in place for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is variable and inconsistent. p.2
- While the provider is aware that there are weaknesses to the provision, the action that they have taken so far has not had the desired impact on making the necessary improvements. p.2
- The curriculum is weak and does not meet the individual learning needs of all children. p.2
- However, there are weaknesses in the procedures around the key-person system. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Although, staff know what children need to learn, the support that children receive is inconsistent. p.2
- For example, they understand the importance of monitoring existing injuries and the procedures that they should follow if they have concerns about a child. p.3
- The walls have concrete patio slabs below them, presenting a risk of injury should children lose their balance and fall off. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 897
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Seedlings Pre School Hooe Primary School, Hooe Road, Hooe, Plymouth PL9 9RG
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The provider does not ensure that staff supervise children adequately in the garden. The poor deployment of staff means that they do not notice when children are at risk of falling from high walls or when children access other areas that are not safe. While the provider is aware that there are weaknesses to the provision, the action that they have taken so far has not had the desired impact on making the necessary improvements. In addition to this, the provider does not maintain records of their vetting processes to enable them to demonstrate the suitability of staff.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Although staff are caring and build warm relationships with children, they do not have high enough expectations for children's learning. The curriculum is weak and does not meet the individual learning needs of all children. Although, staff know what children need to learn, the support that children receive is inconsistent. Staff often just watch older children play, and do not recognise when to engage in children's play to help them to learn. However, younger children receive better support, and staff are more responsive to their needs. Staff set clear routines, so children know what to expect, and they support children when they struggle to share the resources. Overall, children behave well.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The provider does not ensure that children receive the help they need so that they can make good progress in their learning. For example, staff working with older children simply follow them around and carry them, and they do not use the strategies in place to help them to learn to communicate and engage in learning. In addition to this, there are weaknesses to the key-person system, the information that parents receive is not consistent and parents do not know how their children are progressing with their learning.
p.2
need to do better?
n Staff do not appropriately supervise children outside or deploy themselves appropriately to keep children safe. Children climb and balance on high walls, unnoticed by staff. The walls have concrete patio slabs below them, presenting a risk of injury should children lose their balance and fall off. In addition, children get stuck in thorns as they go behind buildings that are out of the sight of staff. n The support in place for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is variable and inconsistent. Some children receive targeted support and the staff working with them use effective strategies to engage them. However, some staff do not use the strategies and this prevents children from being able to communicate their needs and be involved in learning. In addition to this, the resources that have been purchased using specific funding to meet children's physical and emotional needs are not accessible for children
p.2
need to do better?
18 March 2025 to use when they need it, and staff do not think to make them available. This means, at times, children are unable to regulate their emotions and engage in learning opportunities. n The provider ensures that staff have mandatory training on subjects, such as paediatric first aid and child protection. However, they do not ensure that staff have the skills and knowledge to help them to meet children's needs effectively or keep them safe. n The provider does not ensure that they implement a curriculum that offers children appropriate challenge. Activities are mundane and do not excite children or inspire them to learn. For example, older children are given paper plates to paint, using paint brushes designed for toddlers. Children simply paint the plate and wander off as staff stand over, and do not offer any engagement or encouragement to children. This does not help to motivate children, or support
p.2
need to do better?
them to learn more. n Staff work with parents to get to know children's interests, and the routines of the younger children. This helps staff to make sure children are supported to feel secure as they settle into nursery. However, there are weaknesses in the procedures around the key-person system. Staff do not ensure that parents receive information about their children's learning, so that they can support their learning at home. n Staff understand procedures in place for child protection. For example, they understand the importance of monitoring existing injuries and the procedures that they should follow if they have concerns about a child. However, the provider does not ensure that they have records to demonstrate that they follow robust recruitment procedures.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
ensure records of the vetting processes for staff are retained and are in line with safer recruitment procedures 01/04/2025
p.3
Due date
18 March 2025 improve the deployment of staff and the supervision of children to meet the needs of all children and to keep them safe 19/03/2025
p.3
Due date
ensure that children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive appropriate support to help them to make progress in their learning 01/04/2025
p.4
Due date
implement procedures to provide support and coaching for staff to ensure they have the knowledge and skills to carry out their roles and responsibilities. 01/04/2025
p.4
Due date
improve the key-person system to ensure that parents are kept up to date regarding their children's progress and are given information to help them to support children's development at home 11/04/2025
p.4
Due date
implement a curriculum that meets all children's individual learning needs and offers appropriate challenge, to help them make progress in their learning. 11/04/2025
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 2655479 Local authority Plymouth Inspection number 10392803 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Sessional day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 99 Number of children on roll 181 Name of registered person Seedlings Pre-School Limited
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 07365257165 Date of previous inspection 6 January 2023
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Seedlings Pre School registered at the present site in 2022 and is managed by a board of directors. It is open from 7.30am until 6pm, all year round. There are 33 staff members; 21 hold relevant qualifications between level 2 and level 6. The pre- school provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors Victoria Nicolson Rebecca Hayday
p.5
Inspection activities
n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n The manager and deputy manager joined one of the inspectors on a learning walk and talked to the inspector about their curriculum and what they want the children to learn. n The inspectors talked to staff, parents and children at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspectors observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and requested evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery n Staff spoke to the inspector about how they support children with SEND.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
18 March 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion