Other · Ofsted report
University of Northampton
Summary
Chris Stevens (lead), Chris Davies, Hazel Henson, Stephanie Innes-Taylor
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
26 May 2022
- Inspectors verified
Chris Davies, Chris Stevens, Hazel Henson, Stephanie Innes-Taylor
- Postcode verified
NN1 5PH
- Name on report verified
University of Northampton
- URN verified
70050
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Robust quality assurance processes ensure that high-quality training and delivery of the taught and placement components of the courses uphold high expectations. p.2
- The courses are ambitious and well sequenced overall. p.2
- The curriculum has been recently redeveloped to ensure that it is ambitious and consistently informed by academic research. p.2
- Trainees are well prepared for their first teaching positions in a ‘super supportive’ environment. p.1
- Leaders have a clear vision for generating high-quality teachers for the region. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders should ensure that mentors and partnership leaders know what trainees learn in university-based sessions so that they can build on this work with their trainees, further strengthening the successful integration between the university and local schools. ◼ Trainees are not consistently able to recall the important knowledge they need to promote equality and diversity in schools. p.3
- Leaders should further develop this area of the curriculum so that it is as ambitious as other aspects of the training course. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance9
“Leaders have a clear vision for generating high-quality teachers for the region.” p.2Reading & phonics2
“Phonics is particularly well developed in the postgraduate course.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 856
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 31, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
University of Northampton The University of Northampton, Waterside Campus, University Drive NN1 5PH
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education and training Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
A mentor conveyed the high regard in which the university’s training programme is held: ‘We feel confident in the new generation of teachers being trained in the university.’
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Trainees are well prepared for their first teaching positions in a ‘super supportive’ environment. Staff invest in trainees developing the knowledge and skills required to become effective future practitioners. Relationships between trainees and staff are positive. Many who shared their views value the responsive communication and tailored support afforded by staff. They enjoy the course and would recommend it to others, particularly placement experiences. One trainee, typical of many, said: ‘This course has cemented in my mind that teaching is exactly what I am meant to be doing.’ Trainees receive high-quality mentoring in schools. They take advantage of the distinctive and well- stocked education resource library.
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Trainees are introduced to the demands of teaching right from the start. The recruitment process is rigorous. The training programme, including how pupils learn to read, is ambitious and well informed by academic research. Recent enhancements are beginning to strengthen trainees’ understanding of effective support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language, particularly linked to physical education.
p.1
Information about this ITE provider
◼ The partnership opened in September 2004. ◼ The partnership currently has 266 trainees, all training in the primary phase. ◼ The primary phase has trainees on the following training routes: Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) route; PGCE School Direct fee-paid route; and the undergraduate Bachelor of Arts with Qualified Teacher Status (BA QTS) route. ◼ There are 221 schools involved in the primary-phase partnership, across 10 local authorities. ◼ The provider works with a range of schools of different sizes, local contexts and Ofsted judgements at their most recent inspection. A few schools have not yet had an inspection as they have recently become academies. One school visited during the inspection of the partnership had not yet received a school inspection.
p.1
Information about this inspection
◼ The inspection was carried out by four of Her Majesty’s Inspectors. ◼ Inspectors spoke with a range of staff and partners, including the lead for the primary education programme, the professional lead for QTS, other senior leaders and course tutors. Inspectors also spoke with the dean of the faculty of health, education and society and the deputy dean. ◼ Inspectors spoke with members of the partnership development group and senior leaders of multi-academy trusts, the Northamptonshire Teaching School Hub and schools involved in the partnership. ◼ Inspectors spoke with 37 trainees from both the PGCE and BA QTS routes. ◼ Inspectors carried out focused reviews of reading, English, mathematics, science and the foundation subjects. ◼ Inspectors made visits to 12 schools to meet with trainees, mentors, training coordinators and headteachers.
p.2
better?
Leaders have a clear vision for generating high-quality teachers for the region. The partnership is strongly valued, underpinned by a culture of collaboration and mutual respect. Leaders, including those responsible for governance, understand the strengths and development priorities of the partnership well. Robust quality assurance processes ensure that high-quality training and delivery of the taught and placement components of the courses uphold high expectations. Moderating tutors play a pivotal and effective role in assuring the purposeful integration of the curriculum between the university and school settings. As one partnership leader said: ‘Recent changes to leadership have helped things to move forward with greater clarity over the last few years.’
p.2
better?
The curriculum has been recently redeveloped to ensure that it is ambitious and consistently informed by academic research. It is well aligned with the requirements of the Department for Education’s core content framework, which is met in full. The courses are ambitious and well sequenced overall. They help trainees to build and apply secure knowledge of the national curriculum subjects and how pupils learn, including themes such as knowledge retrieval, questioning and checking pupils’ understanding. Subject knowledge is well developed, including in all foundation subjects. The innovative use of digital technology supports all trainees in developing independence in their subject knowledge. Many take the opportunity to share their successes with other trainees and staff. However, trainees’ understanding of the importance of relationships education, the protected characteristics and fundamental British values is not as consistently secure as it
p.2
better?
All trainees are taught to use systematic synthetic phonics in their teaching of reading, commencing with the ‘phonics festival’ early in the course. Phonics is particularly well developed in the postgraduate course.
p.3
better?
An effective system of formative assessment has been implemented against five core areas of training: professional behaviours; classroom practice, subject and curriculum knowledge; adaptive teaching; assessment; and managing behaviour. The ‘My Progress’ record requires trainees to constantly reflect on their practice, with the close support of well-trained mentors and tutors. Module assignments enable trainees to deepen their understanding of the academic theories and principles which underpin their training. However, these details are not readily shared with placement leaders and mentors. As a result, mentors are not always able to reinforce important research findings during placement experiences. Partnership leaders say that they would like this information to be shared with them to further strengthen the curriculum integration between the university and schools.
p.3
(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)
◼ The university’s curriculum is well informed by academic research. However, leaders do not pass on details of this learning directly to mentors or training coordinators. Consequently, they are unable to reinforce the academic theory which underpins trainees’ practice. Partnership leaders say they would like to receive this information. Leaders should ensure that mentors and partnership leaders know what trainees learn in university-based sessions so that they can build on this work with their trainees, further strengthening the successful integration between the university and local schools. ◼ Trainees are not consistently able to recall the important knowledge they need to promote equality and diversity in schools. Some have gaps in their knowledge about fundamental British values, relationships education and protected characteristics . Trainees say they would like more specific training on these elements of the
p.3
(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)
programmes. Leaders should further develop this area of the curriculum so that it is as ambitious as other aspects of the training course.
p.3
compliance criteria?
◼ The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.
p.4
ITE provider details
Unique reference number 70050 Inspection number 10238510
p.5
ITE provider details
This inspection was carried in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook’. This framework and handbook sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.
p.5
ITE provider details
Type of ITE provider Higher Education Institution Phases provided Primary Date of previous inspection 11 June and 1 October 2014
p.5
Inspection team
Chris Stevens, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Chris Davies Her Majesty’s Inspector Hazel Henson Her Majesty’s Inspector Stephanie Innes-Taylor Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.5
Annex: Placement settings, schools and colleges
Inspectors visited the following schools as part of this inspection:
p.6
Name URN ITE phase
Barby Church of England Primary School 141044 Primary Crick Primary School 121812 Primary Delapre Primary School 122069 Primary Duston Eldean Primary School 121945 Primary Harpole Primary School 121976 Primary Higham Ferrers Nursery and Infant School 121899 Primary Kingsthorpe Grove Primary School 121943 Primary Kingsthorpe Village Primary School 133732 Primary Millway Primary School 122086 Primary Little Stanion Primary School 135283 Primary Oakway Academy 140853 Primary Standens Barn Primary School 144177 Primary guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Name URN ITE phase
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-
p.7
Name URN ITE phase
government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Name URN ITE phase
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Name URN ITE phase
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion