Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Carrington Junior School

Inspected 11 May 2022 · published 5 Jul 2022 · URN 110274

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Sue Cox (lead), Matthew Rixson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 May 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Matthew Rixson, Sue Cox

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    HP10 9AA

  • Name on report verified

    Carrington Junior School

  • URN verified

    110274

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−13Mixedmore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyeffectivelythrivingeffectiveambitiouswell-plannedstrongfeel safe
Criticismnot consistentlynot alwaysweaknessesnot yetgapsconcernsstrugglenot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1182w−14
  • Safeguarding98w−3
  • What needs to improve28w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,275
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 56
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 1%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Carrington Junior School 4 Chapel Road, Flackwell Heath, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire HP10 9AA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 10 and 11 May 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy school and feel safe. They confirm that bullying is not a problem and trust adults to quickly sort out any worries. Relationships are warm and caring. Most pupils behave sensibly.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils know that it is important to value everyone, no matter their family background or beliefs. They talk confidently about the importance of upholding the school’s values of respect, learning, friendship, responsibility, kindness and resilience. Pupils like to make the most of school life by attending the many clubs on offer, including the school’s thriving choir.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders are ambitious for all pupils to achieve well. In the short time that they have been in post, leaders have put much in place to get things back on track. However, weaknesses in the wider curriculum mean that pupils do not achieve well in some subjects. Pupils who are behind with reading and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not consistently get the support that they need.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most parents have nothing but praise for the school and the care that their children receive. As one parent commented, ‘The staff at the school are all wonderful. They are very approachable and always quick to help with any issues.’

p.2

better?

Changes of staff and the leadership of the school, as well as the COVID-19 pandemic, have stalled Carrington’s journey of improvement. Leaders and governors are resolute and united in their ambition to improve the school.

p.2

better?

Leaders have made improvements to some key aspects of the school during this turbulent period. They have implemented a well-thought-out curriculum in mathematics and science. This has brought about greater consistency and means that teachers are clear about what pupils need to learn. This is helping pupils to achieve well.

p.2

better?

Leaders are continuing to make improvements to the English curriculum. There is now a consistent approach to teaching reading comprehension. Pupils get to know and enjoy lots of good-quality texts. Rightly, leaders plan to strengthen the curriculum further to make more explicit the key knowledge and vocabulary that pupils need to learn.

p.2

better?

Leaders have not yet embedded a systematic approach to the teaching of phonics for those pupils who have fallen behind or not yet learned to read. Extra support is not consistently precise or effective. This means that specific gaps in pupils’ learning are not identified or addressed well enough. Some pupils are not catching up quickly enough and becoming competent readers. 10 and 11 May 2022

p.2

3

The wider curriculum is still a work in progress. Content is typically driven by cross- curricular topics and not always sequenced logically. Leaders have not identified what precise knowledge they want pupils to learn and remember. Weaknesses in the curriculum are mirrored in how well staff check what pupils have learned and address any gaps. There are also lengthy periods when pupils do not learn some subjects. As a result, pupils’ learning is patchy. Some struggle to remember or make links with previous units of learning.

p.3

3

Teachers generally explain things well and ‘hook’ pupils into learning. They plan activities to interest pupils and get them involved in lively discussions. Teachers make sure that pupils with SEND, including those in the specialist resource base, have access to a wide curriculum offer. Pupils’ additional needs are identified quickly and accurately. However, teachers do not consistently take enough account of the needs of pupils with SEND. As a result, some pupils with SEND do not learn as well as they could across the whole curriculum.

p.3

3

Through the school’s well-planned curriculum for pupils’ personal, social and health education, pupils learn how to keep safe, including online. They learn what it means to be a good friend, and how to recognise peer pressure. Pupils are encouraged to be good citizens and to understand and debate important values such as equality and diversity.

p.3

3

Staff are upbeat and enjoy working at the school. Staff and parents particularly value leaders’ work and support through the COVID-19 pandemic.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is a strong culture of safeguarding in this school. Staff are alert to anything that may indicate a problem and pass on their concerns quickly to leaders. When needed, leaders refer any concerns to external safeguarding partners. They actively pursue these referrals to ensure pupils and families get prompt support. Leaders have ensured that staff have received up-to-date training about specific safeguarding issues. These include online safety and peer-on-peer abuse, to reflect the risks pupils face online and changes in statutory requirements. Recruitment processes are thorough, and records are maintained well.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have not yet embedded a systematic approach to the teaching of phonics for those pupils who have fallen behind or not yet learned to read. Specific gaps in pupils’ learning are not identified or addressed well enough. Leaders must implement their plans to introduce a structured synthetic phonics programme and 10 and 11 May 2022

p.3

4

provide training for staff. They must ensure that phonics and reading are taught well to enable pupils who are still learning to read to catch up quickly.  Not all teachers consistently take enough account of the needs of pupils with SEND and adapt teaching and activities to meet their needs. This means that pupils with SEND are not always supported well and do not build their knowledge well. Leaders should ensure that they provide training for staff to support them in knowing how to adapt teaching effectively to more consistently and effectively meet the needs of pupils with SEND.  In most foundation subjects, leaders have not identified with precision the essential component knowledge that they want all pupils to learn. Content is typically driven by the cross-curricular topic and not always sequenced logically to enable pupils to build their knowledge effectively. This means that pupils are not

p.4

4

building on what they have learned before and struggle to remember previous learning. Leaders should ensure that they identify clearly the specific knowledge they want pupils to learn and remember in each subject. Additionally, leaders need to ensure that they provide training for new and inexperienced subject leaders to enable them to play a full and effective role in strengthening the curriculum.  In some foundation subjects there are very lengthy blocks of time when pupils do not learn these subjects. This makes it difficult for pupils to reconnect with and remember previous learning and build on their knowledge. Leaders need to review their current arrangements for the teaching of foundation subjects and address this issue.  Assessment processes such as teachers’ checks on how well pupils are learning in the foundation subjects are not precise enough. This means that teachers do not have the information that they need to identify and address any gaps in pupils’

p.4

4

knowledge well enough. Leaders should ensure that staff receive appropriate training to enable them to use assessment information well to inform teaching.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. 10 and 11 May 2022

p.4

5

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 10 and 11 May 2022

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10227339 Type of school Junior

p.6

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 19 and 20 June 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 Since the previous inspection there have been many changes of leaders and staff. The previous headteacher left the school in December 2021. The current headteacher and deputy took up their posts in January 2022. These were initially interim internal appointments. Following a full recruitment process their positions were made permanent. Many subject leaders are new, and most teachers have joined the school since the previous inspection.  The school has an additional resource provision for pupils who have a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. This is known as The Blossom. Currently, eight pupils attend this provision. Most of these pupils spend some time in mainstream classes as well as attending lessons and therapy sessions in the specialist provision.  The school currently uses one local-authority-run alternative provision.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 10 and 11 May 2022

p.6

7

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in reading, mathematics, science and geography. For each deep dive inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited lessons, looked at samples of pupils’ work, spoke to teachers and spoke to some pupils about their learning. Inspectors also heard some pupils read.  Inspectors also considered the curriculum and pupils’ work in history and art and design.  Inspectors met with the headteacher and the deputy headteacher.  The lead inspector met with three members of the governing body including the chair of governors. The lead inspector also had a telephone discussion with a representative from the local authority.  To inspect safeguarding, inspectors considered the school’s record of recruitment

p.7

7

checks and other safeguarding documents and records. The lead inspector met with the designated leader for safeguarding. Inspectors also spoke with pupils and staff.  Inspectors took into account the views of staff from their responses to Ofsted’s confidential staff survey and during meetings with them.  Inspectors considered pupils’ responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey. They also gathered pupils’ views through meetings with them and at other times of day, for example during visits to lessons and at lunchtime.  Inspectors took into account parents’ responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, and parents’ free-text comments. An inspector met with some parents at the end of the first day of the inspection.

p.7

Inspection team

Sue Cox, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Matthew Rixson Ofsted Inspector 10 and 11 May 2022

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion