Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Carrington Junior School
Summary
Mineza Maher (lead), Hester Millsop
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Jun 2018
- Inspectors verified
Hester Millsop, Mineza Maher
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
HP10 9AA
- Name on report verified
Carrington Junior School
- URN verified
110274
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that: – pupils, including the most able and most-able disadvantaged, have the opportunity to sustain and deepen their thinking – tasks, particularly in writing and mathematics, are well matched to pupils’ starting points. p.2
- Since the previous inspection, the school has had a significant period of turbulence in leadership and staffing. p.3
- This has left a legacy of poor teaching and weak outcomes for pupils. p.3
- Leaders are aware of this but have not yet improved sufficiently the quality of teaching, learning and assessment at Carrington Junior School. p.3
- The new headteacher is tenacious and has a clear view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. p.3
- Importantly, she has made sure that current staffing is stable and that there is high morale among staff to improve the school. p.3
- The headteacher has set high expectations among staff. p.3
- She has a clear focus on doing what is right for pupils and their families. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment29
“This has left a legacy of poor teaching and weak outcomes for pupils.” p.3Progress & outcomes29
“This has left a legacy of poor teaching and weak outcomes for pupils.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,023
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Carrington Junior School 4 Chapel Road, Flackwell Heath, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire HP10 9AA
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders and governors have not been successful in halting the decline in pupils’ progress since the last inspection. Governors use a range of activities to check the work of the school. Some of these activities are sharply focused and help to drive improvement. Nevertheless, governors do not challenge leaders enough because they do not have a detailed and accurate understanding of the progress which current pupils should be making. Pupils’ attainment in mathematics and writing is too low. Current pupils have fallen behind in their learning and too many are working below the expectations for their age. New systems to support the progress of pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities have not yet secured improvements in these pupils’ achievements. Teaching does not consistently meet pupils’ needs or deepen their learning. Consequently, pupils, including the most able and most-able
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
disadvantaged, do not make enough progress. Middle leaders do not routinely check the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress. Consequently, they are unable to quickly identify and address weaknesses when they arise.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The headteacher is tenacious and leads the school well. She has a clear picture of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Improvement plans are appropriate. This school is improving. Leaders’ actions are beginning to have a positive effect on teaching and pupils’ progress. Pupils conduct themselves well. They work and play together amicably. Pupils listen well to instructions and are polite and courteous. Pupils are punctual, feel safe and enjoy coming to school. Safeguarding is effective.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that: – pupils, including the most able and most-able disadvantaged, have the opportunity to sustain and deepen their thinking – tasks, particularly in writing and mathematics, are well matched to pupils’ starting points. Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by ensuring that: – leaders sharpen their monitoring and development of the quality of teaching – the new systems to support pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are used effectively to improve pupils’ progress – governors develop a sharper understanding of the progress current pupils should be making so that the challenge they offer to leaders is more effective.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Since the previous inspection, the school has had a significant period of turbulence in leadership and staffing. This has left a legacy of poor teaching and weak outcomes for pupils. Leaders are aware of this but have not yet improved sufficiently the quality of teaching, learning and assessment at Carrington Junior School. The new headteacher is tenacious and has a clear view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Importantly, she has made sure that current staffing is stable and that there is high morale among staff to improve the school. The headteacher has set high expectations among staff. She has a clear focus on doing what is right for pupils and their families. Her leadership is steering improvements across many areas of school life, especially in pupils’ personal development and welfare. Until recently, senior leaders were not always clear about pupils’ starting points. Since September, leaders have used assessment information more rigorously. However,
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
leaders do not quickly pick up inconsistencies in teaching or use assessment to set challenging work. As a result, pupils do not make rapid progress. Most middle leaders are new to their roles and some are also new to the school. They do not check the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress rigorously. Therefore, weaknesses in teaching are not addressed with sufficient urgency. The newly appointed inclusion manager is passionate to raise standards. The assessment of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities has not always been accurate. Very recently, the inclusion manager has developed more effective systems for assessment and monitoring. Nevertheless, these systems have not been in place for long enough to improve the outcomes for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. There is now a clear focus on ensuring that the pupil premium funding is used well to support disadvantaged pupils. Leaders use the funding effectively to promote pupils’
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
well-being, for example through ‘Launch Pad’, an extracurricular club which focuses on providing additional support linked to raising attainment. However, its use has not fully secured improvements for disadvantaged pupils’ progress and attainment across the school. The sport premium funding is spent well. Specialist teachers have been brought in to deliver high-quality teaching of PE and to train staff. As a result, more pupils are beginning to participate in competitive events. Most parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, value and support the school. Parents recognise the recent improvements in the school’s provision. They appreciate the good communication that they receive, the many learning experiences provided for their children and how staff are approachable and address any concerns efficiently. One parent commented: ‘Some real positive changes have taken place with the absolute focus on providing excellent education,’ and
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
another parent wrote: ‘I am very happy with the leadership at the school and the dedication of all staff. The commitment really shows and as a parent, I feel the staff have a genuine interest in the children.’
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors bring a range of relevant skills and experience to the governing body. Some governors are very experienced. They are committed, organised and work hard for the school and the pupils. They have a strong understanding of safeguarding arrangements and provide useful performance management of the headteacher. The governing body are aware of the main priorities of the school. However, governor visits are not always purposeful in driving improvement. Similarly, governors do not have a detailed and accurate understanding of the progress current pupils should be making. As a result, they do not always offer enough challenge to leaders.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Staff are well trained and receive updates on safeguarding issues, such as the different types of abuse. As a result, staff know how to keep their pupils safe. Leaders keep detailed records of vulnerable pupils. They work closely with external agencies to ensure that pupils are kept safe and their welfare needs are met. The curriculum offers a range of successful opportunities for pupils to learn about how to keep themselves safe in a range of situations. For example, pupils speak knowledgeably about how to keep themselves safe online and know to keep their personal details secure when using computers.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The quality of teaching is inconsistent. Some teaching helps pupils to learn well, so they work hard and make progress. However, some teaching is not suited to pupils needs. On these occasions some pupils lose interest in their learning and make limited progress. Assessment information is not consistently used to plan learning that matches pupils’ needs and abilities. Consequently, work does not routinely challenge pupils so that they make good progress, especially the most able and middle-ability pupils. There are some interesting tasks that engage pupils. For example, in a Year 5 class a Shakespeare lesson helped pupils to understand the text. However, inconsistent challenge means that some pupils do not achieve well enough. The quality of teachers’ questioning is variable. For example, in a Year 6 mathematics lesson, questioning was used effectively to engage pupils and move learning on. However, this is inconsistent across the school. At times questioning does not
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
overcome misconceptions, or challenge pupils to think more deeply about their learning. There are too few opportunities for pupils to develop effective skills in writing, including through writing at length in a range of subjects. Although extended writing books were introduced in April, teachers’ expectations for their use are not consistent. As a result, learning and progress is variable. The teaching of mathematics is beginning to improve. Teachers plan work to ensure that pupils are taught basic concepts. They encourage pupils to develop their number skills through daily practice. However, development of pupils’ skills in problem-solving and reasoning is less consistent. Teaching assistants support pupils’ learning well, both in the autistic spectrum disorder resource provision and throughout the school. For example, in a mathematics lesson extra support enabled pupils to confidently articulate and explain their learning using
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
mathematical vocabulary. New leaders are beginning to ensure that pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are given appropriate challenge and guidance in their learning. However, these pupils are not yet making the progress they are capable of from their relative starting points. Classrooms and corridors are brightly decorated with stimulating displays of pupils’ work and helpful guidance for motivating learning. These resources and examples of good work encourage pupils and show them what they can achieve.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils play happily together during playtimes, work collaboratively and listen to others’ opinions in lessons. Pupils are polite and show respect for each other and adults. For example, they hold doors open for adults and each other. They were keen to share their views about the school. They know that on the rare occasions that bullying occurs, adults do not tolerate it and deal with it swiftly. Pupils are confident, enjoy school and feel safe. Pupils are very clear that staff are readily available to deal with any worries or concerns that they might have. Pupils have a good understanding of how to stay safe, including when using the internet. Pupils vote for the members of the learning council and learn about democracy, liberty and the law. They are well prepared for life in modern Britain.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils are polite and friendly, and cheerfully welcome visitors to the school. They take care to look smart in their school uniform. Pupils talk enthusiastically about different aspects of school life that they enjoy, including special events such as the Year 6 residential trip and after-school clubs. Around the school and at playtimes, pupils are considerate and respectful. They walk quietly when others are working. This is because pupils and staff have fostered high expectations of conduct and good manners. Pupils look after their school environment and keep it neat and tidy. Behaviour is good in lessons. From time to time, a few pupils lose concentration in lessons when work is not challenging enough. The vast majority of pupils attend school regularly. Leaders encourage pupils to celebrate high attendance. Leaders are swift to check the whereabouts of absentees to
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Since the previous inspection, pupils’ progress in writing and mathematics has weakened considerably. In 2017, the school did not meet the government’s minimum floor standards. Current pupils are beginning to make stronger progress. However, many need to catch up if they are to meet expected standards by the end of key stage 2. There are wide variations in pupils’ rates of progress and attainment in a range of subjects and across the year groups. Pupils’ progress is accelerating in mathematics due to improvements to the quality of teaching, particularly of calculation strategies. Nevertheless, pupils receive insufficient opportunities to apply their skills to solve problems and reason. As a result, too few, particularly the most able and most-able disadvantaged pupils, attain at a high standard in mathematics. Some pupils are not achieving strongly in writing because there are too few opportunities for pupils to develop good writing skills across a range of subjects. Pupils
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
do not apply their understanding of grammar, punctuation and spelling to produce high-quality written work. As a result, many pupils write below the expected standard for their age. The progress of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is beginning to improve. This is because the new leadership team has evaluated pupils’ needs and starting points and put in place more focused support. Nevertheless, work in this area has not yet secured sustained improvements in outcomes for these pupils. Pupils enjoy reading in school and at home and become fluent and very keen readers. The new reading system has enthused pupils. A Year 5 pupil commented, ‘It is inspiring to read a range of books.’
p.6
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
School details
Appropriate authority The local authority
p.7
School details
Date of previous inspection 8–9 July 2014
p.7
Information about this school
Carrington Junior School is an average-sized primary school. Most pupils are of White British heritage and very few speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils with disabilities or special educational needs supported at school action is below average. The proportion of pupils supported with an education, health and care plan is above average. Most of the pupils with education, health and care plans are in the eight-place Additional Resource Provision (ARP). This is a facility for pupils with autistic spectrum disorder. The proportion of pupils supported through the pupil premium is below average. This is additional funding provided by the government to support pupils, in this school, who are eligible for free school meals or looked after by the local authority. The school does not meet the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 21 parts of lessons. All observations were conducted jointly with the headteacher or interim deputy headteacher. Meetings were held with the headteacher, senior and middle leaders, a group of pupils, the chair of the governing body and other members, and a representative of the Buckinghamshire Learning Trust, the company commissioned by the local authority to undertake school improvement work on its behalf The inspection team took into account the views of 60 parents expressed in their responses to the online questionnaire Parent View. They also took account of the responses of 153 pupils to the online pupil survey and 18 responses of staff to Ofsted’s staff survey. The inspection team also looked at a range of school documentation including information about pupils’ attainment and progress, the school’s self-evaluation and documentation related to the safeguarding of pupils.
p.9
Inspection team
Mineza Maher, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.9
Inspection team
Hester Millsop Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.10
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.10
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion