Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Langham Oaks

Inspected 14 Oct 2021 · URN 1213822

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

RI to be good

Ashley Hinson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Oct 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Ashley Hinson

  • Helped and protected verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Postcode verified

    CO4 5PA

  • Name on report verified

    Langham Oaks

  • URN verified

    1213822

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2020.

  • OverallRI to be good
  • Helped and protectedRI to be good
  • Leadership and managementRI to be good

13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−51Criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseseriousfailuresenjoyclearpositiveengagingwell behavedsafe
Criticismconcernfailurerequires improvementlackcompromisedgapsnot clearconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings990w−52
  • What needs to improve96w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,076
shorter than usual (typical 2096)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 43
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 1 Langham Oaks School Road, Langham, Colchester, Essex CO4 5PA Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Langham Oaks is a residential special school with academy status located in a rural village near Colchester. The school can accommodate 28 pupils in the residential provision for between one and four nights per week. The school caters for pupils with social, emotional and mental health needs.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The residential manager has been in post for six years. He has the necessary experience and qualification for the role.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The last welfare inspection took place in March 2020.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Due to COVID-19, at the request of the Secretary of State, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers on 17 March 2020.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

requires improvement to be good

How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

requires improvement to be good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good

p.1

requires improvement to be good

The residential special school is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.

p.1

requires improvement to be good

Date of previous inspection: 2 March 2020

p.1

requires improvement to be good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 2

p.1

improvement to be good

Children who attend the residential provision benefit from doing so. They have good relationships with the staff and enjoy the activities. However, there are several areas in respect of safeguarding that need improvement. Safeguarding shortfalls were identified at the last inspection. Although managers have made some improvements since, further issues have been identified at this inspection.

p.2

improvement to be good

The staff and children get on well. Staff are calm and clear in their communication with the children. Feedback from children’s families is positive.

p.2

improvement to be good

The staff know the children well. They generally have a good understanding of children’s needs and their past experiences. However, this knowledge is compromised by staff who do not fully understand some of the information in the children’s risk assessments.

p.2

improvement to be good

Children benefit from engaging activities provided by the dedicated staff team. Activities are exciting and the children look forward to them. These activities enable children to experience things they have never done before. As a result, they develop their skills, confidence and self-esteem.

p.2

improvement to be good

Children who attend the residential provision make greater progress in their attainment in mathematics and English than those who only attend in the day. General school attendance is also better for residential children. The staff work closely with families and professionals to support the children to attend school.

p.2

improvement to be good

The residential areas are well maintained. The individual and communal areas are very clean and very tidy. The school uses closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras in some residential areas. However, although a CCTV policy is in place, there is no risk assessment to justify its use.

p.2

improvement to be good

Children feel safe. They have good relationships with the staff and say they can talk to them about any worries and concerns they have. The children said that they trust the staff to help them.

p.2

improvement to be good

Risk assessments written to guide staff in minimising risk are generic. They lack precision regarding risks to children and do not give clear guidance to staff on how to manage the risks. Consequently, the staff are unclear regarding some elements of these risk assessments. For example, when risk assessments refer to certain behaviours, staff are unaware of what this specifically means. This means that staff may not have all the information that they need to keep children safe. Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 3 In one instance, a concern in regard to a member of staff that should have been discussed with the designated officer was not. Although the concern was taken seriously, failure to share this with safeguarding professionals does not provide transparency or allow for external oversight of investigations.

p.2

improvement to be good

One member of staff appointed as a designated safeguarding lead has not refreshed their mandatory designated safeguarding lead training within the appropriate timescale.

p.3

improvement to be good

One member of staff’s recruitment checks do not include the verification of references, despite this now being required. In addition, another member of staff’s employment history record was not specific enough to provide assurance regarding any employment gaps.

p.3

improvement to be good

There have been very few incidents during residential time. The children are well behaved. Children say that bullying is not an issue at the residential provision. Children have confidence that staff would deal with this if an incident did occur.

p.3

improvement to be good

There have been no physical interventions. Staff manage behaviour through the good relationships that they have with children. One child said, ‘The staff really help you here if you are angry.’ When asked what they do, he said, ‘They teach you to talk about it, and help you calm down.’

p.3

good

The residential manager is due to leave. A new residential manager has been appointed and will be starting in January 2022. Recently, unexpected illness has meant that the staff team has been without two tiers of line management. This has affected the capacity and confidence of the staff team.

p.3

good

An email from a member of day staff at the school regarding a concern included language that minimised the safeguarding concern. Although senior managers dealt with the safeguarding concern appropriately, the failure to relay this concern clearly was not picked up by the managers at the time. Therefore, the member of staff has not been able to learn from this.

p.3

good

Individual care plans are in place for the children. These include a range of targets. However, the plans are not clear on the steps taken to achieve these targets. In one instance, the care plan contained significant out-of-date information. Consequently, the staff lack clear and current guidance.

p.3

good

The residential manager has ensured that staff receive regular supervision and annual appraisals. However, although the residential manager has met regularly with the headteacher these meetings are not recorded in line with the supervision policy. As a result, discussions, rationales and agreed actions are not captured. Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 4 An independent person provides good monitoring reports. This is a significant development. These reports have the potential to support the improvement needed. Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 5

p.3

special schools

The school does not meet the following national minimum standard for residential special schools:

p.5

special schools

 The school ensures that: arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of children at the school; and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State. (NMS 11.1)

p.5

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that recruitment records evidence that all checks have taken place and that employment histories are precise enough to explore any gaps.  The registered person should ensure that residential care plans are up to date and clear on how staff can support children to achieve their targets.  The registered person should ensure that the residential manager benefits from reflective supervision in line with the school’s supervision policy.  The registered person should ensure that any use of CCTV in the residential provision is necessary, proportionate, risk assessed and reviewed.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 6

p.5

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: 1213822

p.6

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential special school

p.6

Residential special school details

Email address: sdawson@langhamoaks.co.uk

p.6

Inspector

Ashley Hinson, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspector

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion