Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Mar 2020
- Inspectors verified
Ashley Hinson
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CO4 5PA
- Name on report verified
Langham Oaks
- URN verified
1213822
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance4
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers good” p.1Wellbeing & mental health3
“They said that the staff know them well enough to spot if they are struggling emotionally.” p.3Health & safety3
“Managers have improved the handling of medication.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,141
- shorter than usual (typical 1609)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 1 Langham Oaks School Road, Langham, Colchester, Essex CO4 5PA Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this residential special school
Langham Oaks is a residential special school with academy status. Up to 28 pupils board for between one and four nights per week. The school caters for pupils who have social, emotional and mental health needs. The last welfare inspection took place in February 2019.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of previous inspection: 11 February 2019
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 2
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Strong relationships provide a good foundation for the children to develop their confidence and feel safe. Although some elements of safeguarding practice need improvement, the children enjoy their time in the residential provision. They make progress and experience new opportunities.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The staff have a good knowledge of the children. The children feel that the staff value them and care about them. The children described the residential provision as a home from home.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The children make progress socially, emotionally, educationally, and in their independence skills because of the support that they receive. For example, the children have developed cooking skills, made friends and improved their reading skills.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The children spoke with great enthusiasm about the range of activities that they participate in. They develop new interests and experience new things, such as a residential trip to Wales.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The children enjoy the good-quality food. They were consistently positive about the food provided. Healthy and vegetarian options are available. Breakfasts are open to all pupils to ensure that all children can eat before school.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The children have formal and informal opportunities to contribute their views. They said that the staff take their views seriously. They are confident that if they have a concern, staff will act to support them. This confidence contributes to the children’s sense of safety.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Managers have improved the handling of medication. Safer procedures have lessened the risk of medication coming into school without staff’s knowledge.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The current accommodation is sparse and tired. In addition, the dining room was very cold in the evening. Although the children said that they are happy with the accommodation, these factors compromise the homeliness of the environment. A new school with residential accommodation is being built on the school site, and the pupils will move into the new building. However, in the interim period, the shortfalls need to be addressed to ensure that the environment is suitable.
p.2
improvement to be good
Managers have not ensured that safeguarding records are thorough. The records were difficult to locate and were not consistently good enough. Some records lacked dates and signatures. In one instance, although contact was made with the Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 3 designated officer and information was shared, records were not made of what discussion took place and what advice was given. In a further instance, insufficient action was taken to address a concern about the conduct of a member of staff. Failure to respond proactively and record clearly means that children are not safeguarded as far as is reasonably practical.
p.2
improvement to be good
The children feel safe and they trust the staff. They said that the staff know them well enough to spot if they are struggling emotionally. The children said that they would not need to ask for help; the staff would recognise their distress and respond.
p.3
improvement to be good
Simple risk assessments cover the known and predictable risks and consider the sleeping arrangements. Staff are aware of the risks to children and how they are to be managed.
p.3
improvement to be good
The children said that bullying is not an issue. They said that they could share concerns with staff if such incidents arise, and have faith that staff will act. The staff are alert to the potential of incidents and know how to respond and raise safeguarding concerns.
p.3
improvement to be good
The children said that the staff model kind and supportive behaviour. One child said, ‘You have respect for each other. Mutual respect. You can trust the staff. You learn to trust other people. Everyone helps everyone out. If you see someone in distress you help them out. They help you out.’ The staff have consistent expectations, know the children well and respond before incidents escalate. Consequently, physical interventions are very rarely used in the residential provision.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
A well-respected, experienced manager leads the residential provision. He is valued by the staff and managers and the children. He is reflective and realistic about the quality of care.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Despite significant staffing pressures, managers have ensured that children continue to make progress and enjoy the residential experience.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Since the last inspection, the managers and designated safeguarding staff have received regular supervisory support. This includes formal line management supervision and external supervision focusing on staff well-being. This is a significant improvement.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The staff and manager have a good understanding of the plans for the children and they share the plans with the children’s families.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The managers ensure that children’s admissions to the residential provision are carefully managed. A social worker spoke about how the managers enable children to board at a flexible pace that is suitable to the individual child. As a result, a child who Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 4 was reluctant to board is now embracing the experience, enabling him to continue to live at home.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
There have been no complaints about the residential provision. The manager has met the previously unmet national minimum standard and addressed the four recommendations that were made at the last inspection.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Independent external scrutiny has not been as strong or effective as necessary. One independent visit to the school has been missed. The last two visits did not result in any feedback from children and the subsequent reports have not been routinely shared with the management committee. This limits the effectiveness of the process and compromises senior managers’ oversight of the residential provision. Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 5
p.4
special schools
The school does not meet the following national minimum standards for residential special schools:
p.5
special schools
11.1 The school ensures that: arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of children at the school; and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State. 20.3 Written reports of all monitoring visits are provided to the head teacher (or school equivalent) and where applicable the governing body, organisation, or partnership. Reports are also provided to each member of that body (or the appropriate committee of that body), within two weeks and as written by the visitor without amendment or summary. Monitoring reports should be retained by the school and made available during an inspection.
p.5
Recommendations
Ensure that the residential accommodation is maintained to a suitable standard and that the dining room is sufficiently heated. Ensure that all required independent visits take place and include consultation with the children, and that their views are included in the subsequent report.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 6
p.5
Residential special school details
Social care unique reference number: 1213822
p.6
Residential special school details
Headteacher/teacher in charge: Simon Dawson
p.6
Residential special school details
Type of school: Residential Special School
p.6
Residential special school details
Email address: sdawson@langhamoaks.co.uk
p.6
Inspector
Ashley Hinson, Social Care Inspector (lead) Inspection report for residential special school - Langham Oaks 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspector
T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion