Summary
Ashley Hinson (lead), Cathy Russell
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Feb 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Ashley Hinson, Cathy Russell
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CO4 5PA
- Name on report verified
Langham Oaks
- URN verified
1213822
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that all medication is safely and securely stored. p.3
- In particular, ensure that arrangements for the collection of medication are safe and known by all staff. p.3
- Ensure that there is a whole-school approach and a clear policy on the use of mobile technology, in particular internet-enabled devices, during residential time. p.3
- Ensure that the records specified in Appendix 1 are maintained and monitored by the school and that action is taken as appropriate, in particular in relation to safeguarding and child protection. p.3
- Ensure that each child’s written placement plan is agreed as far as is practicable with the child, the child’s parents/carers and any placing authority for the child. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families8
“Feedback from families is excellent.” p.2Staff development6
“Lack of supervision for managers.” p.2Teaching & assessment5
“The staff generally write clear and easy-to-follow risk assessments.” p.5Care & placements5
“Parents are not involved in reviewing children’s placement plans.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,181
- shorter than usual (typical 1609)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 12 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for residential special school – Langham Oaks 1 Langham Oaks School Road, Langham, Colchester, Essex CO4 5PA Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this residential special school
Langham Oaks is a residential special school with academy status. Up to 28 pupils board for between one and four nights per week. The school caters for pupils who have social, emotional and mental health needs. The last welfare inspection took place in December 2017
p.1
Information about this residential special school
Inspection dates: 11 to 13 February 2019
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of previous inspection: 5 December 2017
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: outstanding Inspection report for residential special school – Langham Oaks 2
p.1
Key findings from this inspection
This residential special school is good because:
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
The children make progress socially, emotionally and educationally. The children enjoy a range of interesting and targeted activities. The children are supported by a dedicated and child-focused staff team. Feedback from families is excellent. The children feel safe. The well-respected residential manager supports his staff well.
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
The residential special school’s areas for development are:
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
Lack of supervision for managers. The process for receiving the medication that children bring to school is unclear. Lack of clear policy on the management of internet access and mobile phones. Some policies contain out-of-date references. Parents are not involved in reviewing children’s placement plans. Inspection report for residential special school – Langham Oaks 3
p.2
special schools
The school does not meet the following national minimum standard(s) for residential special schools: 19.6 All staff have access to support and advice for their role. They also have regular supervision and formal annual appraisal of their performance.
p.3
Recommendations
Ensure that all medication is safely and securely stored. In particular, ensure that arrangements for the collection of medication are safe and known by all staff. Ensure that there is a whole-school approach and a clear policy on the use of mobile technology, in particular internet-enabled devices, during residential time. Ensure that the records specified in Appendix 1 are maintained and monitored by the school and that action is taken as appropriate, in particular in relation to safeguarding and child protection. Ensure that each child’s written placement plan is agreed as far as is practicable with the child, the child’s parents/carers and any placing authority for the child. Inspection report for residential special school – Langham Oaks 4
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
This is a good residential provision. The children make progress because of the support that the enthusiastic and committed staff provide. Managers monitor progress and use the learning to inform practice.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children who board make progress in their educational attainment and attendance. The support that the children receive in the residential provision makes a significant contribution to this. The staff encourage and support children to develop study skills and complete homework. This contributes to children accessing college placements that were previously thought to be beyond them.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The staff are a strength. They are child focused. They celebrate children’s achievements as a matter of routine. This conveys messages to children that they are valued. The children get on well with the staff, who support them. The staff are experienced and know the children well.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
A consistent theme that emerged in discussion with staff was the emphasis that they put on developing good relationships with the children. The strength of the relationships between the staff and children helps the children to manage their own behaviour.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The children have access to a range of interesting and stimulating activities. Managers monitor the activities that are chosen with a view to encouraging greater variety. The activities are tailored to encourage social interaction and lessen isolation.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Arrangements to manage medication are generally good. The staff have their competency to administer medication assessed. A dedicated room is available for medication administration. However, the process for receiving medication that children bring to school is unclear. This increases the potential for errors to occur.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Feedback from families is excellent. Families value the residential provision and the difference that it makes to their lives and their children’s lives. However, parents are not involved in reviewing their children’s placement plans. Consequently, parents are not given the opportunity to agree the plans.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The children said that they feel safe. Families said that their children are safe. The children have access to an independent person whom they know and with whom they can discuss any concerns.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Two children have gone missing since the last inspection. These incidents were managed appropriately. The staff support the children to manage their behaviour. The staff intervene Inspection report for residential special school – Langham Oaks 5 appropriately if children’s behaviour deteriorates. They do so without recourse to physical intervention. The staff understand what may trigger difficult behaviour in the children. They are alert to cues that children are beginning to struggle. This knowledge enables them to intervene early to support the children.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The staff know what to do if they have concerns about a child or colleague. They know the reporting processes and whistleblowing mechanisms.
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Managers respond to safeguarding concerns effectively. Safeguarding records are comprehensive.
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The staff generally write clear and easy-to-follow risk assessments. They tailor these assessments to the individual needs of the children.
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The school’s current policies and procedures do not consider the approach to managing internet access in the evenings or during the night. Some children can have their phones in their bedrooms at night. This is not formally risk assessed. There is no guidance for staff on what to consider or how to manage this to ensure a safe and balanced approach.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
A well-respected manager leads the residential provision effectively. He has high aspirations for the children who access it. He leads by example and works with the children, who know him well.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The management team has a thorough understanding of children’s plans and progress. A clear and easily understood set of performance data aids all staff to understand how children are doing.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The staff have access to appropriate training. The staff have or are working towards a relevant level 3 qualification.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The management team recognises that supervision is an area that requires improvement. The residential manager ensures that his staff are well supervised. However, the residential manager and the deputy designated safeguarding lead have not had a supervision for over a year. Although they can access ad hoc support, this does not provide formal and documented opportunities to reflect on practice and access emotional support, guidance and challenge. Lack of regular supervision does not meet the school’s own policy of half-termly supervision for staff.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The process for admitting children to the residential provision has developed. Staff now undertake a home visit to assess suitability. A professional said that the process for transition is child led and highly effective. They said, ‘The move into the provision was handled really well. (The child) was not rushed. It was always on his terms.’ The children feel listened to. Regular meetings for residential pupils give children the opportunity to influence activities, decor and food choices as a matter of course. Inspection report for residential special school – Langham Oaks 6 Internal and external monitoring of the quality of care offers some challenge and identifies areas for improvement. However, internal monitoring has not identified some discrepancies between policies. As a result, some policies contain out-of-date references.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the school knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school – Langham Oaks 7
p.6
Residential special school details
Social care unique reference number: 1213822
p.7
Residential special school details
Headteacher/teacher in charge: Gary Corbett
p.7
Residential special school details
Type of school: Residential special school
p.7
Inspectors
Ashley Hinson, social care inspector (lead) Cathy Russell, social care inspector Inspection report for residential special school – Langham Oaks 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion