Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)
North Hill House
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Mar 2020
- Inspectorssingle source
Wendy Anderson
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Postcode verified
BA11 2HB
- Name on report verified
North Hill House
- URN verified
SC033014
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallRI to be good
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Care staff know children well and have built strong, trusting relationships with them. p.2
- Care staff are ambitious and have high expectations for the residential children, but this ambition is not clearly evidenced in children’s individual targets. p.2
- They have lots of fun and take part in an excellent range of activities and new experiences. p.2
- However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The culture of safeguarding across the school is weak, because the management of safeguarding concerns is not always effective. p.3
- Leaders and managers do not deal with all safeguarding concerns rigorously; the management of concerns is too variable. p.3
- This setting requires improvement, because of weaknesses that were identified in safeguarding and leadership and management. p.2
- On occasions, leaders have delayed contacting the designated officer, referrals to the designated officer are incomplete and safeguarding records lack clarity and do not evidence all of the actions taken. p.3
- In contrast to this poor practice, inspectors saw two examples of good-quality investigations and records, demonstrating that when the right person is managing these concerns the correct actions are taken. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the safeguarding arrangements and culture. p.5
- Ensure that records provide a clear, comprehensive record of all the actions taken to safeguard children. p.5
- Improve the quality of safeguarding investigations and ensure that they commence in a timely manner, including the outcome, actions taken and lessons learned. p.5
- Ensure that safeguarding information is recorded in a way which aids monitoring. p.5
- Ensure that a clear policy regarding the use of social media and mobile phones is developed. p.5
- Ensure that a written agreement regarding the children’s use of mobile phones is developed. p.5
- This must include clarity on the school’s expectations of staff and parental responsibilities. p.5
- Ensure that all documents and records are signed and dated by the author. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language4
“The communication from education staff to care staff and some parents requires improvement.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,562
- shorter than usual (typical 2096)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 1 North Hill House North Hill House, Fromefield, Frome, Somerset BA11 2HB Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this residential special school
North Hill House is an independent residential special school providing weekly boarding for boys and girls aged six to 19 years. The school provides for pupils who have autism spectrum disorders or Asperger syndrome, and associated learning difficulties.
p.1
Information about this residential special school
This inspection was aligned with an inspection of the school.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
requires improvement to be good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The residential special school is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Date of previous inspection: 23 January 2019
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 2
p.1
improvement to be good
This setting requires improvement, because of weaknesses that were identified in safeguarding and leadership and management. These weaknesses were evident across the school.
p.2
improvement to be good
Safeguarding concerns are not always managed well. For example, in response to one incident when an allegation was made, insufficient action was taken to keep the children safe, including a delay to the start of the internal investigation.
p.2
improvement to be good
Residential children receive individualised care from care staff. Care staff know children well and have built strong, trusting relationships with them. Care staff are skilled communicators, understanding the nuances of each child’s communication. Care staff are ambitious and have high expectations for the residential children, but this ambition is not clearly evidenced in children’s individual targets.
p.2
improvement to be good
Children benefit from their residential experience. They have lots of fun and take part in an excellent range of activities and new experiences. These events help improve the children’s social skills, self-confidence and communication skills. Some children were able to stay at the residential provision for one week during the summer holidays. This provided support for both the children and their families.
p.2
improvement to be good
The parents who contributed to the inspection were very positive about the care that their child is receiving and the progress that they are making.
p.2
improvement to be good
Residential children’s healthcare needs are met. Care staff ensure that they access the medical and support services that they need. The storage of medication is secure, and good records of delivery and administration of medication are maintained. Each child has an up-to-date healthcare plan which provides clear guidance for care staff.
p.2
improvement to be good
The residential accommodation is of a high standard. Each child has their own room with en suite facilities. Their rooms have recently been redecorated and furnished to reflect their taste. Care staff and residential children have worked together on the communal areas to make them comfortable.
p.2
improvement to be good
The cooking facilities in the residential provision require improvement. Currently, there is no kitchen in the residential provision. Care staff cook children’s meals in the food technology room and then carry the food a considerable distance to serve it to children. Despite being assessed for risk, this practice continues to present a risk to staff and children. In addition, the lack of a kitchen does not support care staff to develop children’s independence skills.
p.2
improvement to be good
Care records are well organised. However, some plans are not consistently signed or dated. Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 3
p.2
improvement to be good
The culture of safeguarding across the school is weak, because the management of safeguarding concerns is not always effective. Leaders and managers do not deal with all safeguarding concerns rigorously; the management of concerns is too variable. On occasions, leaders have delayed contacting the designated officer, referrals to the designated officer are incomplete and safeguarding records lack clarity and do not evidence all of the actions taken. The quality of some investigations is poor, and the outcome of investigations or lessons learned are not evident in safeguarding records. In contrast to this poor practice, inspectors saw two examples of good-quality investigations and records, demonstrating that when the right person is managing these concerns the correct actions are taken. Care staff spoken with during the inspection demonstrated a clear understanding of how and when to report child protection concerns.
p.3
improvement to be good
More action is needed to ensure that children’s use of mobile phones across the school is always appropriate. Residential children are not allowed to take their mobile phones into school, and they sign a contract to say that they will use their phones responsibly. Care staff have a verbal agreement with parents that parents will regularly check the phones for inappropriate content. Currently, there is no written agreement clearly stating the expectations of either party. The policy regarding the use of social media and mobile phones is very limited and does not clearly state the responsibilities of staff.
p.3
improvement to be good
Care staff are not risk averse, and they work with the residential children so that they access the community and take part in a range of exciting trips and activities safely. Care staff are aware of the children’s additional vulnerabilities and work with them to develop their understanding of risk.
p.3
improvement to be good
Behaviour is well managed in the residential provision. A positive approach to understanding children’s behaviour in the context of children’s needs has resulted in a reduction in incidents and only one restraint since the previous inspection. Conversations are now held with children by staff who are not involved in the restraint. Care leaders and managers monitor and review all behavioural records and challenge staff practices effectively, where needed.
p.3
good
Leadership and management require improvement, due to the shortfalls identified across the school and in relation to the safeguarding of all children. Leaders and managers do not ensure that safeguarding matters are always dealt with in accordance with child protection policies. In addition, their oversight of safeguarding records is weak. Currently, safeguarding information is recorded in several different places, and this impedes the effective monitoring of concerns to ensure that good practices are maintained. The quality of safeguarding records is variable. Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 4 Care leaders and managers have an accurate understanding of the strengths and areas for development of the residential provision. They have identified some of the areas for improvement noted within this inspection and are in the process of developing and implementing actions to address them. Monitoring systems, including
p.3
good
the visits by the independent person, are assisting care leaders effectively in developing the provision.
p.4
good
Care leaders and managers provide a supportive environment for the care staff team. Care staff receive regular, good-quality and effective supervision which helps them to develop their practice. Care staff feel well supported by care leaders and spoke very highly of the care coordinator. Care staff did tell inspectors that they would like more contact with the organisation’s senior managers, who visit the school.
p.4
good
The current on-call system requires improvement. Care staff said that when care leaders and managers are on call they are always available, but this is not the case when education leaders and managers are on call.
p.4
good
Care staff receive good-quality training which is closely linked to the needs of the residential children. This is monitored by care leaders and managers to ensure that staff training is current and reflects the developments in childcare practices. Leaders and managers support care staff to obtain qualifications; 10 of the 12 care staff members now have at least a level 3 qualification.
p.4
good
The communication between care and waking night staff has improved, and they now provide residential children with more cohesive care. Waking night staff now feel valued and supported.
p.4
good
The communication from education staff to care staff and some parents requires improvement. Care staff and parents are not consistently receiving the same information about a child; this does not aid joint working.
p.4
good
The school’s website has improved, providing access to current policies. Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 5
p.4
special schools
The school does not meet the following national minimum standards for residential special schools:
p.5
special schools
The school ensures that the welfare of pupils at the school is safeguarded and promoted by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written risk assessment policy and appropriate action is taken to reduce risks that are identified. (NMS 6.3) The school ensures that arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of children at the school; and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State. (NMS 11.1) There are clear arrangements for suitably experienced staff to deputise in the absence of the head of care (or school equivalent). (NMS15.3)
p.5
Recommendations
Improve the safeguarding arrangements and culture. Ensure that records provide a clear, comprehensive record of all the actions taken to safeguard children. Improve the quality of safeguarding investigations and ensure that they commence in a timely manner, including the outcome, actions taken and lessons learned. Ensure that safeguarding information is recorded in a way which aids monitoring. Ensure that a clear policy regarding the use of social media and mobile phones is developed. Ensure that a written agreement regarding the children’s use of mobile phones is developed. This must include clarity on the school’s expectations of staff and parental responsibilities. Ensure that all documents and records are signed and dated by the author. Improve the current arrangements to cook meals for children in the residential provision. Ensure that care staff and parents receive the same information on updates about
p.5
Recommendations
a child from education staff. Improve the on-call responses from education leaders and managers. Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 6 Review and improve the children’s individual targets to support them in achieving their full potential.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 7
p.6
Residential special school details
Social care unique reference number: SC033014
p.7
Residential special school details
Headteacher/teacher in charge: Sarah Acland
p.7
Residential special school details
Type of school: Residential special school
p.7
Residential special school details
Email address: SarahAcland@priorygroup.com
p.7
Inspector
Wendy Anderson, social care inspector Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspector
T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion