Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)
North Hill House
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 Jan 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Wendy Anderson
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BA11 2HB
- Name on report verified
North Hill House
- URN verified
SC033014
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This exceptional piece of work has led to the child’s anxieties being greatly reduced, and to them successfully coming into school. p.4
- The arrangements for helping children to join the school and residential provision remain excellent. p.2
- One of the many examples of this excellent work includes support given to a child who was very anxious about undertaking the journey between home and the school. p.4
- Children are provided with bespoke transition plans that meet their needs exceptionally well. p.2
- Children enjoy staying in the residential provision and are making good progress with their individual goals. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Although staff have debrief discussions about incidents in which restraint is used, the quality of records about these discussions varies, as some are not always of consistently good quality. p.2
- Training records are not up to date, as they fail to document all of the training that staff have received. p.5
- The care coordinator has identified this as an area for improvement, and has devised a new handover format to address the weakness. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of debrief discussions held with staff about the use of restraint and ensure that the records of these discussions are consistently of good quality and are useful. p.3
- Improve the quality of supervision and appraisal that staff receive. p.3
- In addition, ensure that the records of these sessions are consistently detailed to show how the supervisor has responded to the staff member’s feedback. p.3
- Undertake a review of staff training needs to ensure that staff are provided with the training they require, and that this training meets their development objectives. p.3
- In addition, increase the number of staff who successfully achieve a level 3 qualification. p.3
- Update the website to ensure that updated policies are added to this site promptly. p.3
- Review the arrangements that are currently in place for cooking meals for children in the residential provision. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance4
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,489
- about usual (typical 1609)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 7
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 1 North Hill House North Hill House, Fromefield, Frome, Somerset BA11 2HB Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this residential special school
North Hill House is an independent residential special school providing weekly boarding for boys and girls aged six to 19 years. The school provides for pupils who have autism spectrum disorder, Asperger syndrome and associated learning difficulties.
p.1
Information about this residential special school
The last inspection took place in February 2018.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of previous inspection: 21 February 2018
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 2
p.1
Key findings from this inspection
This residential special school is good because:
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
Children enjoy staying in the residential provision and are making good progress with their individual goals. Relationships between staff and children are positive, established and trusting. The quality of these relationships benefits children, especially in helping them to behave positively and develop self-confidence. The arrangements for helping children to join the school and residential provision remain excellent. Children are provided with bespoke transition plans that meet their needs exceptionally well. Safeguarding matters are dealt with effectively. Risk is managed well and staff work hard to keep children safe. Staff consult well with children about ways to improve their residential experience.
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
The residential special school’s areas for development are:
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
Although staff have debrief discussions about incidents in which restraint is used, the quality of records about these discussions varies, as some are not always of consistently good quality. Currently, some policies listed on the school’s website are out of date. While leaders have reviewed these policies, the revised versions have not been added to the website promptly. Staff receive regular supervision and appraisals of their performance. However, the quality of these sessions varies, as does the information recorded about these sessions. Staff are provided with a range of face-to-face and online training courses. However, some staff said that this training does not always meet their own development targets. In addition, not all care staff have achieved a level 3 care qualification. The current arrangements for providing meals for children in the residential provision require improvement. Staff are preparing and cooking meals in the food
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
technology classroom and carrying hot food a considerable distance through doors and down stairs. In addition, this arrangement does not provide children with a domestic-style kitchen in which to develop and practise their independence skills. Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 3
p.2
Recommendations
Improve the quality of debrief discussions held with staff about the use of restraint and ensure that the records of these discussions are consistently of good quality and are useful. Improve the quality of supervision and appraisal that staff receive. In addition, ensure that the records of these sessions are consistently detailed to show how the supervisor has responded to the staff member’s feedback. Undertake a review of staff training needs to ensure that staff are provided with the training they require, and that this training meets their development objectives. In addition, increase the number of staff who successfully achieve a level 3 qualification. Update the website to ensure that updated policies are added to this site promptly. Review the arrangements that are currently in place for cooking meals for children in the residential provision. Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 4
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children like staying in the residential provision and they benefit from the opportunities and experiences they have during their stays. Children spoke to the inspector positively about the staff who look after them, confirming that they feel well cared for. Children said that they can talk to any of the staff about anything that worries them; they feel listened to and valued.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children receive good-quality care from a dedicated and child-focused staff team. The children benefit from being able to access a range of in-house therapy provisions. The therapy team works cohesively across the school and with children’s families to provide a consistent approach to therapeutic care. Parents spoke highly of this valuable resource.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
A continuing strength of the school is the quality of the support provided in order to help children to join the school and the residential provision. This transition process is fully tailored to the needs of the child and their family. Helping children to join the school can take considerable time because it is completed at a pace that suits the children and their individual needs; this approach has proven to be very effective. One of the many examples of this excellent work includes support given to a child who was very anxious about undertaking the journey between home and the school. The staff developed a book for the child containing photographs of landmarks found on the journey and information about the remaining journey time left to complete. This exceptional piece of work has led to the child’s anxieties being greatly reduced, and to them successfully coming into school.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Since the previous inspection, the playground has been revamped and now provides children with a safe and fun place to play. Children have fun when staying in the residential provision. They can pursue their own interests as well as try new activities, including a wide range of activities in the local community. Parents said that the range of activities provided for children is a strength of the school and enables the children to have the same opportunities as other young people.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are making progress in their educational development. For some of the children, this is the first time in a long while that they have regularly attended school and joined in with lessons. One child said that they had been to a lot of different schools before coming here. The child told the inspector that the reason he attended school regularly here and joined in with lessons was because ‘they get me, here’.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children are kept safe because staff accurately understand and effectively implement the safeguarding procedures. Staff understand children’s individual needs and manage risks well. They identify effective ways of reducing risks. Recruitment of new staff and health and safety are dealt with effectively and in accordance with policies Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 5 and procedures.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children feel safe at the school. This is because of the strength of the relationships they have with the staff. Staff have worked hard to establish and maintain trusting and caring attachments with the children. The children feel confident that they can express themselves and their feelings in a safe and nurturing environment.
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Behaviour is managed well because staff understand the reasons for children’s behaviour and use positive reinforcement, praise and appropriate boundaries effectively. As a result, children are making good progress with being able to self- regulate their behaviours and restraint is rarely used. Managers talk with children and staff who have been involved in or witnessed an incident. This good practice is not captured well in all of the records kept about the discussions held with staff. Some records do not show that some staff have had good-quality debrief discussions.
p.5
good
Monitoring of the residential provision takes place regularly. The findings from this monitoring have enabled leaders and managers to assess the performance of the residential provision and devise a plan to develop it further. The current care coordinator is new to the role. She is keen to learn, is ambitious for the children and the staff team, and is working hard to improve the service.
p.5
good
Staff receive supervision and appraisals of their performance regularly. However, the quality of this provision is variable. Records of some sessions demonstrate very good-quality supervision and show that supervisors appropriately address practice issues and provide staff with an opportunity to reflect on their work. Records of other sessions do not show that supervisors have responded to and addressed issues raised by staff.
p.5
good
Feedback about the quality of training provided for staff is mixed. Some staff who have worked at the school for a long period of time told the inspector that they would like more training that is appropriate to their own personal development needs and current skill sets. Other staff said that they requested this training and received it. Training records are not up to date, as they fail to document all of the training that staff have received. Not all care staff have completed a level 3 care qualification as required.
p.5
good
The communication between care, education and waking night staff requires improvement to ensure that important information is consistently shared. The care coordinator has identified this as an area for improvement, and has devised a new handover format to address the weakness. This work is yet to be embedded into practice.
p.5
good
Overall, the website provides some useful information about the school and Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 6 residential provision. However, some policies on the website are out of date. While leaders and managers have revised these policies, amended versions have not been uploaded onto the website promptly.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the school knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 7
p.6
Residential special school details
Social care unique reference number: SC033014
p.7
Residential special school details
Headteacher/teacher in charge: Ms Sarah Acland
p.7
Residential special school details
Type of school: Residential special school
p.7
Residential special school details
Email address: SarahAcland@priorygroup.com Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 8
p.7
Inspector
Wendy Anderson, social care inspector Inspection report for residential special school – North Hill House 9 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspector
T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion