Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Mount St Mary's Catholic High School

Inspected 10 Oct 2019 · published 2 Dec 2019 · URN 108097

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Oct 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Christine Durand, Colin Scott, Gordon Watts, Richard Crane

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LS9 8LA

  • Name on report verified

    Mount St Mary’s Catholic High School

  • URN verified

    108097

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 21% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronghigh expectationssafevery highextremelyfeel safecaringsuccessfully
Criticismat riskdisruptionnot consistentlyvariablenot clearnot happy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1070w+49
  • Safeguarding56w−9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,094
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 63, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
1
typical 4
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 3%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of Mount St Mary’s Catholic High School Ellerby Road, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS9 8LA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement 9–10 October 2019

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils really like to attend Mount St Mary’s school. They say that they feel safe and they are safe. Some pupils say that they can see how hard their teachers work to plan exciting lessons for them. Pupils call their school a community and it is. They are excited about many of the opportunities they are given. Many pupils aspire to become school Young Leaders as they get older. They say that this allows them to give the school something back for the help they have received. Staff have very high hopes for pupils’ futures. Pupils are not worried about bullying and know that when it happens their teachers deal with it quickly.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders at all levels want pupils from all backgrounds to do really well. They have high expectations for them all. In lessons the atmosphere is productive and calm. Disruption is rare. During break and lunchtimes, many staff are present to make sure that pupils are safe. The school has a caring ethos that underpins everything it does, from safeguarding to pupils’ personal development. The school looks after a diverse range of pupils, who all work well together.

p.2

better?

In recent years, leaders have successfully transformed how a number of subjects are taught. Subject leaders work together so their staff deliver learning that helps pupils remember facts and concepts well. This is all strengthened by the school’s vision to help children to become confident and resilient young adults.

p.2

better?

Teachers know their subjects well. Pupils learn in stages that build upon earlier tasks. They remember more with activities such as the school’s use of ‘red zone’ in all subjects. This gives pupils time to reflect on their work. Teaching helps pupils to gain knowledge and skills well in several subjects. However, in science they need more time to develop scientific skills to use the knowledge they have learned.

p.2

better?

Pupils study a wide range of subjects in Years 7 to 9 and they can choose subjects that interest them for further study to examination in Year 11. There are lots of activities, such as ‘Debate Mate’ and ‘Maths Doctor’ offered after school that further develop pupils in their learning. Many pupils choose to take part in them.

p.2

better?

Leaders are encouraging more pupils to follow an academic curriculum. In recent years, increasing numbers have followed courses in languages, history and geography. Leaders make sure that all pupils get the same opportunities to study the subjects that interest them. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/ or disabilities (SEND) and pupils who are disadvantaged.

p.2

better?

Teachers make sure that pupils know how well they are doing. They use assessment to show pupils what they need to know, do and remember. However, the use of assessment is variable in mathematics. The school has considered the workload of teachers and designed the assessment cycle to help reduce this burden on staff. 9–10 October 2019

p.2

3

The school ensures that pupils are aware of their careers options when they leave school. Some pupils said that they would like to know even more about future careers and governors are not clear about everything done to support this.

p.3

3

Generally, pupils’ behaviours in and around school show they that respect and care for each other. However, punctuality to lessons for a few pupils is not as good as the majority and a very few pupils sometimes find it difficult to remain calm during social times such as break and lunch. This can be demonstrated in their high-spirited behaviours. In lessons low-level disruption is rare and teachers are usually able to spot and stop it.

p.3

3

Pupils know how to be good people. Teachers ensure that pupils learn about life in modern Britain. They teach them to respect the importance of equality. This includes those laws protecting a persons’ sexual orientation or disability. This work helps pupils to respect others. They understand democracy. For example, they take part in school elections and know key issues about the law. Pupils are nurtured, and supported well by both staff and their peers.

p.3

3

Inspectors agreed with pupils and staff that their school leaders give good advice and look after them. The headteacher is singled out by them for his determination to keep improving the school. Attendance in the school has risen dramatically. Leaders are committed to excluding pupils only when all other the avenues have been exhausted. Governors hold leaders to account well.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have made sure that pupils know how to keep and stay safe online. They make sure that checks on staff are made before they start working at the school. Those in charge of safeguarding know what they are doing. Systems are in place to help identify pupils at risk.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some subjects there is variability in the impact of assessment. Assessment does not consistently help pupils to develop their understanding and memory of subject knowledge. Further work is needed to improve this.  There is a strong sense of community and both pupils and staff look after and respect each other extremely well. For a small number of pupils, however, especially older pupils, self-regulation can be difficult. This is sometimes seen in their punctuality to lessons after break and lunch or their high-spirited behaviours in social time. More work is needed to support further those few pupils to be able to regulate their behaviours and punctuality.  The personal development of pupils is strong in the school. Lots of work has been 9–10 October 2019

p.3

4

done to ensure that they have strong guidance for their future careers. While the school carries out many of the requirements of the Gatsby Principles for careers, further work is needed to ensure that all subjects support the school’s ambition for pupils to ‘dream big’ by having clear links to how subjects can support those future aspirations.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 9–10 October 2019

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 16–17 May 2017

p.5

Information about this school

 The school received a monitoring inspection in June 2018.  The school operates on a large site and is slightly over-capacity.  There are four alternative providers used by the school for a very few numbers of pupils. These are Southway in South Leeds, Stephen Longfellow Academy in South Leeds, Elect at Temple Moor High School and Queenswood in Central Leeds.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 We met with the headteacher and deputy headteachers to discuss the school’s ethos, vision and provision for the curriculum.  An inspector met with a representative of the local authority and from the Gorse Academy Trust.  As part of the inspection process, we carried out in-depth considerations of four subjects, known as ‘deep dives’: English, mathematics, science and geography. We talked to leaders and teachers about their curriculum plans. We also talked to 9–10 October 2019

p.5

6

pupils about what they knew and remembered in these subjects. We also visited lessons in these subjects and looked at pupils’ work.  We also spoke with children to explore how the school helped them to manage behaviour.  We looked at the school’s work to make staff and pupils aware of safeguarding issues. We also looked at safeguarding records to see how concerns over pupils’ safety were recorded and followed up. We also explored how leaders checked the suitability of adults working on site.  The responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaires were considered. This included a pupil survey (over 100 responses), the staff survey (62 responses), Parent View (41 responses) and the free-text responses to Parent View (40 responses). A letter from a parent was also considered.

p.6

Inspection team

Colin Scott, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Gordon Watts Ofsted Inspector 9–10 October 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion