Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Mount St Mary's Catholic High School
Summary
Deano Wright (lead), Andrew Cummings, Chris Smith, Michael Maddison
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
17 May 2017
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Cummings, Chris Smith, Deano Wright, Michael Maddison
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
LS9 8LA
- Name on report verified
Mount St Mary’s Catholic High School
- URN verified
108097
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff give pupils strong pastoral care and support, which contribute effectively to pupils’ well-being and safety. p.1
- They now know and understand the school’s strengths and the areas which need improvement and have worked with the headteacher and senior leadership team to plan for positive change. p.4
- Training received by staff and governors is of a high quality, ensuring that the systems for safeguarding are understood by all and that the actions taken are timely and appropriate. p.4
- Pupils’ relationships with each other and staff are positive and respectful. p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- Leaders’ actions to tackle the areas for improvement following the previous section 5 inspection have not been fully effective. p.3
- Consequently, the quality of teaching and the progress that pupils make continue to require improvement. p.3
- Leaders do not identify accurately what they need to improve. p.3
- They do not track sharply enough whether their actions have brought about improvements. p.3
- Consequently, improvements in teaching are not consistent or rapid enough. p.3
- Although leaders check the progress of specific groups, such as disadvantaged pupils, they do not always take effective action to ensure that pupils catch up. p.3
- As a result, these pupils often do not make enough progress. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,525
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mount St Mary’s Catholic High School Ellerby Road, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS9 8LA
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders have not acted quickly enough to accelerate pupils’ progress. Recent improvements have not had enough time to make an impact.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Pupils’ progress is too variable. The difference between the progress of disadvantaged pupils and that of other pupils with similar starting points is not diminishing rapidly enough. Although middle leaders and teachers check pupils’ progress, they do not ensure that those who fall behind catch up. The quality of teaching is inconsistent. Not all teachers use effective strategies to engage and challenge disadvantaged pupils. Teachers’ questioning is inconsistent. Teachers of some subjects do not challenge pupils sufficiently. Pupils too often repeat work unnecessarily. There are too few opportunities for pupils to write at length and demonstrate their understanding. Consequently, too many pupils, including the most able, do not make the progress they should.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders’ actions have not addressed inconsistencies in teaching across subjects. They have not identified quickly enough the barriers to pupils’ progress. Leaders’ plans to support disadvantaged pupils have not been responsive enough.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Pupils conduct themselves in a mature and positive manner during lessons and around school. The senior leaders have been successful in improving pupils’ behaviour. Pupils’ attitudes to learning are much improved. Careers information, advice and guidance are strong and this supports pupils to be prepared well for the next stage of learning or employment. Staff give pupils strong pastoral care and support, which contribute effectively to pupils’ well-being and safety. Leaders provide pupils with high-quality opportunities for spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching, in order to increase rates of progress, by ensuring that: – teachers plan activities which match the abilities and prior attainment of all pupils, particularly the most able and disadvantaged pupils – strategies used by leaders and teachers allow disadvantaged pupils to make progress at least as good as that of their peers – teachers develop their questioning skills in order to deepen pupils’ understanding of key concepts – pupils have enough opportunities to write at length in a range of subjects. Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: – sharpening the use of pupil-premium funding, so that it leads to demonstrable improvements in outcomes for disadvantaged pupils – checking rigorously that actions to improve the school are bringing about the intended results – ensuring that leaders and teachers are fully held to account for the progress of pupils, particularly those who are disadvantaged, the most able and pupils who fall
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
behind in their learning. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Leaders’ actions to tackle the areas for improvement following the previous section 5 inspection have not been fully effective. Consequently, the quality of teaching and the progress that pupils make continue to require improvement. Leaders do not identify accurately what they need to improve. They do not track sharply enough whether their actions have brought about improvements. Consequently, improvements in teaching are not consistent or rapid enough. Although leaders check the progress of specific groups, such as disadvantaged pupils, they do not always take effective action to ensure that pupils catch up. As a result, these pupils often do not make enough progress. Leaders have not checked the impact of pupil premium funding rigorously. As a result, this funding is not always spent effectively. The actions taken by leaders to improve behaviour have resulted in a calmer climate for learning. The number of fixed-term exclusions has declined and there are fewer
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
incidents requiring the use of sanctions. Actions to improve the attendance of specific groups have resulted in reduced absences for disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Leaders have planned a curriculum that offers a wide range of options in Years 10 and 11. For example, leaders have ensured that vulnerable pupils access alternative provision that offers suitable qualifications. However, the curriculum, together with homework set for pupils, does not secure consistently good rates of progress in English, mathematics and science. Recently appointed leaders in these subject areas have produced appropriate plans and identified correct priorities. However, these plans have not had enough time to make a significant impact on the quality of teaching and learning. Personal, social and health education are well developed through assemblies and lessons. For example, pupils deliver assemblies exploring their community. Pupils are
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
respectful of each other and demonstrate a high level of respect for others’ faiths and cultures. Leaders are preparing pupils well for life in modern Britain. Leaders have spent the Year 7 literacy and numeracy catch-up funding effectively. Pupils are assessed accurately and intervention is focused and timely. Consequently, the reading and numeracy skills of pupils who had not reached the required standards by the end of primary school have improved rapidly. New leadership of special educational needs provision is effective and the additional funding is suitably deployed. Leaders are clear about where pupils are in their learning and what they need to do to catch up. Support programmes are carefully planned and tracked to ensure that they are bringing about improvements. Leaders ensure that pupils who speak English as an additional language are well supported in accessing all aspects of school.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Leaders have received support from a national leader of education, the local authority and the Catholic diocese of Leeds. Leaders have used this support to begin to improve provision in mathematics.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors meet with leaders to ensure that they are informed fully about the actions leaders are taking to tackle areas needing improvement. Governors are using this information increasingly to challenge leaders. The governing body has identified accurately that disadvantaged pupils are not doing as well as they should. This has been discussed in governors’ meetings and with leaders. However, these discussions have not brought about the rapid improvements necessary in disadvantaged pupils’ progress. Governors are highly committed. They now know and understand the school’s strengths and the areas which need improvement and have worked with the headteacher and senior leadership team to plan for positive change. However, there has been insufficient time for these plans to have the necessary impact.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders have ensured that a culture of care and vigilance exists, placing safeguarding at the centre of their work. Pupils are safe in school and know how to protect themselves from harm because of detailed work to keep them safe. Pupils know to whom and how to report concerns. Leaders have recruited staff who understand how to support vulnerable pupils. Training received by staff and governors is of a high quality, ensuring that the systems for safeguarding are understood by all and that the actions taken are timely and appropriate. Communication with parents, carers and a wide range of stakeholders is effective in ensuring that pupils are safe and supported.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Despite a number of new teaching and subject leadership appointments, the quality of teaching, learning and assessment continues to require improvement. This is because teaching remains variable in quality and does not consistently lead to good progress. Some teachers do not make specific provision for disadvantaged pupils in their planning or practice. This allows the difference between the attainment of disadvantaged pupils and other pupils to remain. Some teachers have begun to employ strategies to engage and challenge disadvantaged pupils more effectively, but these approaches are not used consistently across the school. The quality of mathematics teaching is too variable. Teachers do not plan interesting lessons consistently at the right standard for pupils’ abilities. They do not check pupils’ understanding well enough. Too often, activities lack challenge and are repetitive. Teaching in science is inconsistent. Too much learning remains at a superficial level
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
and does not help pupils make links between activities or develop a deep understanding of scientific concepts. Extended writing is not used effectively across all subjects. Teachers do not insist regularly that pupils deepen their learning through written work. Teaching has improved in English. Pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, make secure progress when teachers plan at the right level to meet pupils’ learning needs and clearly explain concepts. Although inconsistencies remain, these are fewer than in other subjects. The use of homework is uneven. Too often, homework does not consolidate learning and pupils are not sufficiently challenged by the level of tasks set. Although teachers use questions to check pupils’ knowledge, teachers’ questioning is not used systematically to check and deepen pupils’ understanding. Teachers ask what pupils know but do not always ensure that pupils can explain or apply this knowledge.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teachers, in accordance with the school’s policies, provide parents with clear reports on their children’s progress and attainment.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. The dedicated pastoral team supports pupils well with their personal development and emotional health. The staff focus on all elements of pupils’ well-being and provide essential care and support, ensuring that pupils are safe. The school makes good use of a range of external agencies when pupils need support. Staff are persistent and rigorous in following up referrals to professional partners. Pupils from a range of minority ethnic groups work well together and are respectful of one another. Consequently, the school community is harmonious. The detailed personal, social and health education programme is well designed. As a result of a comprehensive programme of learning, pupils know how to keep themselves safe from physical and emotional harm, avoid the dangers of extremism and keep safe online. Pupils understand how to follow a healthy lifestyle and maintain positive and
p.5
Personal development and welfare
safe physical and emotional relationships. Bullying is rare: when it occurs, staff respond quickly so that it does not happen again. This is supported by pupil leaders undertaking supervisory roles, thereby ensuring that all pupils treat each other with respect. Teachers do not tolerate the use of derogatory language. Pupils said that teachers deal swiftly with any instances when inappropriate language is used. From Year 7 onwards, pupils undertake a programme of careers information, education and guidance which informs their option choices and their next steps when they leave the school. This work is planned and delivered systematically to ensure that all pupils are supported to develop a good understanding of the qualifications and skills they will need to take their next steps. This work prepares pupils effectively. Last year, all pupils secured an appropriate place in further education, employment or training.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
Pupils make a number of visits, including to universities, to encourage them to continue their education. Pupils attend a large range of clubs and activities before and after school. Leaders ensure that disadvantaged pupils engage with these opportunities.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. The new behaviour policy has had a positive impact on pupils’ conduct and attitudes to learning. Pupils in all year groups told inspectors that there has been a rapid improvement in behaviour since its introduction. Behaviour records, detention figures and the numbers of pupils sent out of class are all reducing, which in turn is leading to less disruption to lessons. The number of fixed- term exclusions is diminishing over time. Pupils with identified behavioural difficulties are supported in moderating their behaviour through mentoring. Pupils are proud of their school and the site is calm and orderly at all times. Pupils treat their environment respectfully and keep it free of litter. Pupils’ relationships with each other and staff are positive and respectful. Leaders actively promote the fundamental British values of respect and tolerance. They place a strong emphasis on pupil leadership and personal responsibility, which
p.6
Behaviour
contribute successfully to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Consequently, pupils from different faiths and cultural backgrounds integrate well and treat each other respectfully. Pupils’ attendance has improved and is in line with national levels. The school works tirelessly to engage pupils who have poor attendance and has had some success through using alternative providers.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Outcomes require improvement because the progress pupils make is inconsistent across different subjects and key stages. Typically, pupils enter the school with levels of attainment significantly below the national average. Last year, from these low starting points, pupils made significantly weaker progress than seen nationally in a number of subjects and failed to make up lost ground. As a result, over half of pupils that took GCSE examinations in 2016 did not secure a GCSE at grade A* to C in English and mathematics. Last year, the progress made by boys was weaker than that made by girls. Girls made broadly average progress across a wide range of subjects, but the progress made by boys was in the bottom 10% of schools nationally. Close to half of pupils in the school are from disadvantaged backgrounds. The progress they made last year was significantly below that of other pupils nationally. Only around
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
a third of disadvantaged pupils secured a GCSE at grade A* to C in both English and mathematics. The most able disadvantaged pupils made weak progress in English, science and humanities subjects. The most able pupils also fell well short of their potential last year. They made weak progress in English in particular, but also in mathematics, science and humanities subjects. Only around a third of the most able pupils attained a GCSE at grade A or A* in English and mathematics. Very few attained a GCSE at grade A or A* in science. The progress of pupils currently in the school has begun to accelerate. Leaders make regular checks on the progress of different groups of pupils and these checks show an improving picture. However, scrutiny of the work in pupils’ books shows that these improvements are inconsistent across subjects and key stages. The school’s most recent assessments and the work in pupils’ books shows that
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
disadvantaged pupils across the school are beginning to catch up in some subjects but this is not consistently the case. The school meets the needs of lower-attaining pupils more effectively. Last year, these pupils made better progress overall in comparison with that of other pupils nationally with similar starting points. Outcomes for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities were also weak last year. However, provision for these pupils has improved and has begun to deliver better rates of progress for pupils currently in the school. Although relatively few pupils study a modern foreign language, their progress in languages is strong and disadvantaged pupils who study a language make considerably better progress than other pupils do nationally. Outcomes for pupils in alternative provision are variable. Most follow a programme of learning that includes qualifications in English and mathematics, together with
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
vocational qualifications. Leaders work hard to ensure that these pupils are able to take their next steps confidently when they leave the school. Last year, the efforts of leaders ensured that all pupils who left the school secured a place in further education, employment or training.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 19–20 May 2015
p.8
Information about this school
The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The number of pupils supported by the pupil premium funding is well above the national average. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups and who speak English as an additional first language is much higher than national averages. The proportion of pupils who receive support for special educational needs and/or disabilities is lower than the national figure. The proportion of pupils who have a statement of special educational needs or an education, health and care plan is lower than average. In 2016, the school met the government’s current floor standards, which set minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. The school uses the following alternative providers: Elect, Excel, MAP, Grafton Learning Centre, Breeze Sports Academy, Aspire and Achieve, Aim, COSP, Skills 4U, Leeds College of Building, the Vinery Centre and Hunslet Club.
p.8
Information about this school
The school is supported by a national leader of education, the local authority and the Catholic Diocese of Leeds.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 34 lessons, 10 of which were undertaken jointly with leaders. Leaders and inspectors checked pupils’ work to consider progress in books and folders. Conduct in and around the school was also observed, including at the start and end of the day, breaktimes, lunchtimes and as pupils moved between lessons. Meetings were held with the headteacher, leaders from across the school, teachers and non-teaching staff. Members of the governing body, including the chair of the governing body, also met with inspectors. Inspectors held discussions with representatives from Leeds local authority and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Leeds. Inspectors reviewed documentation provided by the school. This included the school’s self-evaluation, action planning, information about pupils’ progress, minutes of governors’ meetings, evidence of teaching over time and records relating to behaviour and safeguarding.
p.10
Information about this inspection
Inspectors gathered pupils’ views through the online survey and met with groups of pupils from Years 7, 8, 9 and 10. Parents gave their views through the 16 responses to the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View. The 60 staff responses were also considered.
p.10
Inspection team
Deano Wright, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Chris Smith Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion