Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Stockport
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
30 Apr 2019
- Inspectors verified
Helen Gaze
- Early years verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY537603
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The weaknesses in leadership and teaching compromise children's personal development and welfare. p.3
- The childminder has not taken sufficient action to address all of the weaknesses identified at the previous inspection. p.1
- The childminder does not provide her assistant with regular supervision, coaching and support to identify and address weaknesses in practice. p.1
- The childminder has failed to address all actions raised at the last inspection. p.3
- She has not ensured that assistants have appropriate supervision to identify and address weaknesses in practice. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The inspector observed activities in the indoor and outdoor areas. p.2
- The inspector carried out a joint observation with the childminder and assessed the quality of teaching practice. p.2
- The inspector viewed a sample of documents, including children's learning records, attendance registers, medication and accident forms. p.2
- The inspector took account of the views of parents. p.2
- The inspector spoke to the childminder and her assistant at appropriate times during the inspection. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding4
“Safeguarding is effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 897
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date 30 April 2019 Previous inspection date 2 November 2018
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Inadequate 4 Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4 Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4 Outcomes for children Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
n The childminder has not taken sufficient action to address all of the weaknesses identified at the previous inspection. She has not established an effective programme of professional development in order to improve teaching practice. n The childminder does not provide her assistant with regular supervision, coaching and support to identify and address weaknesses in practice. n The childminder does not gather precise information about what children already know and can do when they first start, to identify accurate starting points in their learning. n Teaching practice is weak. The childminder does not use what she knows about children to challenge and engage them in learning. Children do not make good progress. n The childminder lacks knowledge of the required progress check to review children's progress between the ages of two and three years. She does not provide parents with a short written summary of their child's development in the prime areas of learning.
p.1
This provision is inadequate
n The childminder does not minimise all risks to children. She does not help children to explore ways to keep themselves safe so that they can learn to risk assess activities for themselves.
p.1
It has the following strengths
n Children are well behaved. They have secure attachments to the childminder and her assistant, which helps to support their self-esteem. n The childminder promotes children's health and well-being. She prompts children to wash their hands before eating and ensures they have continued access to drinking water.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date establish a programme of professional development and focus on improving teaching skills 30/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
provide assistants with effective supervision, support and coaching to improve their practice and performance 30/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
identify children's prior achievements fully when they first start and gather more precise information when assessing their starting points 30/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
use what is known about children's individual development and progress to shape challenging learning experiences that engage children 30/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
complete the progress check for children aged between two and three years and provide parents with a written summary of their child's development in the prime areas 30/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure that all activities are risk assessed and suitable for children, and help children to explore ways to keep themselves safe. 30/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n The inspector observed activities in the indoor and outdoor areas. n The inspector carried out a joint observation with the childminder and assessed the quality of teaching practice. n The inspector viewed a sample of documents, including children's learning records, attendance registers, medication and accident forms. n The inspector took account of the views of parents. n The inspector spoke to the childminder and her assistant at appropriate times during the inspection.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
The childminder has failed to address all actions raised at the last inspection. She has not ensured that assistants have appropriate supervision to identify and address weaknesses in practice. She does not identify appropriate professional development to raise teaching practice and improve outcomes for children. Safeguarding is effective. The childminder and her assistant have attended training to develop their awareness of all aspects of safeguarding. The childminder has improved safeguarding policies and procedures and they are now in line with guidance from the Local Safeguarding Children Board. The childminder and her assistant have suitable knowledge of the correct procedures for reporting concerns about a child's welfare. They know the procedures to follow in the event of an allegation being made against household members. The childminder maintains the required records of attendance, and her accident and
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The childminder assesses children's learning to identify next steps in their development. However, she does not use this information to fully support children in their learning. The childminder and her assistant do not adapt their teaching so that it is targeted towards helping children to achieve the next steps in their learning. This results in children often becoming easily distracted and they lose interest in activities. The childminder is aware that children undergo a health and development review with the health visitor between the ages of two and three years. However, she lacks knowledge of how to implement the progress check at age two. She does not maximise opportunities to review children's development with parents and other professionals. That said, the childminder shares daily updates with parents, overall, to provide them with information about the activities.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The weaknesses in leadership and teaching compromise children's personal development and welfare. The childminder and her assistant fail to engage children in meaningful play that is matched to their interests and needs. This results in some children becoming bored and disengaged. Older children create running games with the aim of jumping and landing on a beanbag. However, sometimes they miscalculate the jump and land on the floor. The childminder does not minimise risks to children and help them to understand the need for safety when taking on a new challenge. Children benefit from continuous opportunities for fresh air and exercise. They test their physical skills on the climbing equipment, balancing beam and slide.
p.3
Outcomes for children are inadequate
The childminder does not support children to reach their full potential. Children do not benefit from challenging learning experiences that help to prepare them for the next stages in their learning. Nevertheless, the childminder provides opportunities for children to develop their early literacy skills. Children enjoy exploring how to make marks and to write for a purpose. Older children develop some key skills that help to prepare them for their move to school.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY537603 Local authority Stockport Inspection number 10084592 Type of provision Childminder
p.4
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 2 - 11 Total number of places 12 Number of children on roll 12 Date of previous inspection 2 November 2018
p.4
Registers
The childminder registered in 2016 and lives in Stockport. She operates from 7am until 7pm, Monday to Friday, all year round. The childminder works with an assistant.
p.4
Registers
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Registers
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Registers
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Registers
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.5
Registers
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.5
Registers
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion