Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Verulam School
Summary
Andrew Hemmings (lead), Anne Pepper, Ashlie Hughes, James Whiting, Paul Copping, Susan Sutton
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Oct 2018
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Hemmings, Anne Pepper, Ashlie Hughes, James Whiting, Paul Copping, Susan Sutton
- 16 to 19 study programmes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
AL1 4PR
- Name on report verified
Verulam School
- URN verified
137038
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallGood
- 16 to 19 study programmesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Most of these meet their needs well, help them to make good progress, and prepare them effectively for their next steps after Year 11. p.6
- They make good progress and are well prepared for their next steps in education, employment or training. p.1
- They receive effective support from adults across the school so that they are able to make good progress from their starting points. p.3
- Leaders have built on the already effective practice in English to ensure that pupils are making the same strong progress in English as they are in mathematics and science. p.6
- Leaders’ clear focus on English, mathematics and science ensures that pupils make particularly strong progress in these subjects. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate p.1
- Among their raft of actions, they commissioned a safeguarding check from an external agency, reviewed roles and responsibilities in senior leadership, put safety protocols for off-site activities in place, changed the way in which behaviour is managed and started to speak openly about bullying and other unacceptable behaviours. p.3
- Rates of absence and persistent absence continue to be below the national average. p.6
- Pupils who join the school with weak literacy and numeracy skills typically make more progress than other pupils in English and mathematics through Year 7. p.6
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that the progress pupils make across the curriculum is as strong as it is in English, mathematics and science by: – making sure that leaders place the same degree of importance on all subjects as they do on English, mathematics and science – refining the curriculum so that all courses are designed, implemented and taught well. p.2
- Improve the negative perception some older pupils have of the way that staff manage their behaviour by explaining to them the reasons for changes more effectively. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment26
“They behave well and teachers do not need to waste time managing poor behaviour.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,388
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Verulam School Brampton Road, St Albans, Hertfordshire AL1 4PR
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders, including governors, have very high expectations of pupils’ conduct. Their rapid, thorough and effective response to weaknesses identified in the school’s previous inspection has ensured that pupils’ personal development, behaviour, welfare and safety are now good. Pupils behave well in and out of lessons. There is little disruption to learning. Pupils are typically sensible around the school. Most teachers across the school have secure subject knowledge, use questions well and maintain consistent expectations of how pupils should behave. This means that pupils learn well. Sixth-form provision is good. Students benefit from strong teaching and helpful guidance on their futures. They make good progress and are well prepared for their next steps in education, employment or training. Leaders make particularly good use of pupil premium and Year 7 catch-up funding. The progress of groups of pupils who benefit from
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
these resources is at least in line with, and sometimes better than, others nationally. Leaders’ clear focus on English, mathematics and science ensures that pupils make particularly strong progress in these subjects. Pupils’ progress elsewhere in the curriculum, while still good, is not typically as advanced. While leaders’ curriculum design enables pupils to learn well across a broad range of subjects, what pupils are taught is occasionally not matched closely to their needs. A small number of older pupils resent recent changes to the management of behaviour. These few pupils demonstrate negative attitudes towards school.
p.1
Full report
In accordance with section 13(5) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires significant improvement.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that the progress pupils make across the curriculum is as strong as it is in English, mathematics and science by: – making sure that leaders place the same degree of importance on all subjects as they do on English, mathematics and science – refining the curriculum so that all courses are designed, implemented and taught well. Improve the negative perception some older pupils have of the way that staff manage their behaviour by explaining to them the reasons for changes more effectively.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
The response of leaders and governors to the failings identified in the previous inspection report was immediate and comprehensive. Among their raft of actions, they commissioned a safeguarding check from an external agency, reviewed roles and responsibilities in senior leadership, put safety protocols for off-site activities in place, changed the way in which behaviour is managed and started to speak openly about bullying and other unacceptable behaviours. Leaders and governors addressed all recommendations for improvement from the previous inspection with determination. The result of their work has been transformational. Discriminatory behaviour has been almost entirely eradicated. On the very rare occasions that it happens, it is dealt with well. Bullying of all forms is rare and not tolerated by adults. Pupils are safe. They behave well and teachers do not need to waste time managing poor behaviour.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
Leaders recognised that, in collaboration with other schools, they could be even more effective. They embraced the opportunity to join the Alban Academies Trust. The impact of this is already evident in, for example, the development of teaching, learning and assessment. The trust has also effectively supported the school by testing the impact of leaders’ work to improve pupils’ personal development, behaviour and welfare. Leaders continue to reflect on the effectiveness of provision. Consequently, the school continues to improve. Leaders use a range of strategies to improve teaching, learning and assessment. They review the work of teachers and provide training to help them develop. During last year, the focus of improvement in teaching was in how teachers manage behaviour. This worked well. Teachers across the school now manage behaviour in a consistent way. Leaders, teachers and pupils all report the positive impact this has had.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
Additional funding for groups of pupils is utilised to good effect. For example, leaders recognised that some disadvantaged pupils would benefit from extra support in reading to help them access the curriculum. They provided this. Leaders regularly review the progress of disadvantaged pupils and provide additional help for those falling behind. Disadvantaged pupils make good progress compared to other pupils nationally. Other additional funding is used equally well. The needs of pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities are understood well. They receive effective support from adults across the school so that they are able to make good progress from their starting points. Pupils who join the school with low levels of literacy and numeracy receive targeted support and make accelerated progress as a result. Teachers and middle leaders who spoke with inspectors during the inspection
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
expressed confidence in senior leaders. They reflected positively on the training they have had, the effectiveness of new systems for managing behaviour and the support they receive. Their positive views were reflected by pupils’ experience of an improved school. The proportion of parents who said they feel the school is well led and managed in their responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, was high. Leaders have not typically given the same prominence to subjects other than English, mathematics and science. For example, when determining where to target extra support for pupils, those three subjects have taken priority. Consequently, the good progress pupils make in most subjects is not as strong as in English, mathematics and science. Leaders think carefully about what pupils study, when and for how long. They consider the benefit that different programmes of study bring. Because of this, pupils’ timetables
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
usually meet their learning needs well. However, in a small number of cases, the curriculum pupils follow does not meet their needs as well as it could. For example, the progress students in the sixth form make in their financial studies is not as strong as it should be. In some arts subjects, the progress of pupils in younger year groups is slowed by the way work and lessons are sequenced.
p.4
Governance of the school
Governors take their role in leading the school extremely seriously. They responded with concern and urgency to the negative outcome of the previous inspection. Governors describe the previous inspection report as a ‘moment of transformation’ in the history of the school. They were determined to support and hold leaders to account for the next steps they needed to take. Governors undertook a ‘nuts and bolts’ review of senior leadership and implemented change to ensure that the school had the capacity to get better. They rapidly enhanced the way in which they ensure that provision is effective. They now question the information they are provided with more deeply. They check for themselves what is going well and what needs to be better. Governors now understand the school well. They value the work of the headteacher and other staff but are unafraid to challenge. They play a valuable role in the ongoing
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders maintain well-kept records of recruitment checks and ensure that staff have up-to-date training to keep pupils safe. They have effective systems to record concerns about the well-being of pupils. They follow these up in a timely manner, involving external agencies as appropriate. Leaders took decisive and effective action to rectify weaknesses in safeguarding identified in the previous inspection report. They have transformed the culture for safeguarding within the school, placing pupils’ health, safety and well-being high on the school’s agenda. Bullying is rare and dealt with well. New systems keep pupils safe when they are educated off-site or on trips and visits. Leaders are effective in developing pupils’ understanding of groups of people in society who are protected from discrimination by law. Pupils are safe, including from prejudice or intolerance.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Teachers use their good subject knowledge to ensure that lesson time is used well. They set work which motivates and challenges pupils. Teachers sequence learning so that work becomes increasingly complex over time. This helps pupils to develop a deeper understanding of what they learn as they move through the school. Teachers make sure pupils reflect on their work in a number of ways. For example, teachers make good use of questioning to help pupils articulate their thoughts and consider what they have learned. They ask pupils to review how well they and their peers have completed different tasks. As a consequence, pupils become more secure in their knowledge and understanding. Teachers check pupils’ understanding effectively. They revisit topics which pupils have found difficult and build on what pupils already know and can do. Consequently, pupils develop well from their starting points. Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities receive effective support from teachers and
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
teaching assistants. Their needs are met well and they have full access to the curriculum. Teachers and leaders are consistent in their application of behaviour policies. Behaviour across the school has improved as a result. Disruption to learning is rare.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils come to lessons ready to learn. They readily follow routines and settle quickly to their work. They take pride in what they do and demonstrate consistently positive attitudes to learning. Pupils are confident to speak in front of other pupils, such as when answering the teacher’s questions or reading aloud. Others listen carefully and do not interrupt. Leaders have implemented effective systems which directly address concerns from the previous inspection about the well-being of pupils attending off-site provision. For example, pupils are now escorted to the off-site sports field. Regular checks are made on the attendance of the school’s pupils who attend different providers for some or all of their education. Pupils have faith in adults to protect them from harm. They know that bullying and discrimination will not be tolerated. They feel confident to be themselves. Pupils
p.5
Personal development and welfare
generally were confident to speak about different sexualities and told inspectors that they found racism unacceptable. A small number of older pupils are disgruntled by leaders’ new approaches to managing behaviour. They feel that leaders and teachers are too strict. While these pupils do follow rules, they do not fully understand the reasons behind them.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Since the previous inspection, there has been a sea change in behaviour. Teachers and middle leaders have experienced a tangible change in pupils’ behaviour in lessons. They report that they are free to focus on teaching and learning and to not waste time managing behaviour. There is little disruption to learning. Around school, pupils maintain their positive behaviour. They are polite and show respect for others. They move purposefully and calmly around the site. The success of leaders’ work on positive behaviour is evident in the reduction of incidents of pupils being removed from lessons to spend time in the ‘Verulam Exclusion Room’. These have fallen significantly since the system was introduced last year. Exclusions from the school remain below the national average. Rates of absence and persistent absence continue to be below the national average. No groups of pupils are disproportionately represented by high absence.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
Pupils who join the school with weak literacy and numeracy skills typically make more progress than other pupils in English and mathematics through Year 7. This is because leaders use catch-up funding to good effect. Leaders have a good understanding of how to meet the needs of disadvantaged pupils. Consequently, these pupils make good progress compared to other pupils nationally. In 2018, they made more progress than other pupils nationally. A high proportion of pupils take a programme of study which enables them to achieve the English Baccalaureate. The progress they made in 2017 was above the national average, especially in science. Provisional outcomes for 2018 and the work of pupils currently in school indicate that this continues to be the case. Over time, the progress pupils make in mathematics and science has been consistently above the national average. Their progress in English, while still good, has not been as
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
strong as these two subjects in recent years. This has now changed. Leaders have built on the already effective practice in English to ensure that pupils are making the same strong progress in English as they are in mathematics and science. Pupils study a broad range of subjects at key stage 4. Most of these meet their needs well, help them to make good progress, and prepare them effectively for their next steps after Year 11. Progress in most subjects at key stages 3 and 4 is good, but not as strong as in English, mathematics and science. In addition, a minority of courses are not as well structured as most. In these courses, progress is more limited.
p.6
16 to 19 study programmes Good
The sixth form is well led. Leaders reflect on what works well and what needs to improve. They make changes accordingly. For example, leaders recognised that outcomes from post-16 English courses in the past have not been as good as they should have been. They have rectified this and students in A-level English now make good progress from their starting points. Students make good progress across most post-16 programmes of study, including most vocational and academic courses. This reflects the good teaching students receive. Teaching in the sixth form shares the strengths seen across younger year groups. Leaders arrange regular lectures and visits from external speakers covering issues such as diversity, safe driving and human rights. Students and adults lead sessions for others on difference and equality. Students are encouraged to take up leadership roles as senior prefects. Leaders make sure that sixth-form students develop their
p.7
16 to 19 study programmes Good
understanding of the world around them. Leaders ensure that students are prepared well for life after school. They provide guidance on applying for university and preparing for apprenticeships or employment. Employers guide students on interview skills and writing a curriculum vitae. Leaders target the advice and guidance they give based on students’ aptitudes and aspirations. As a consequence, the proportion of pupils who leave the school to go into education, employment or training is consistently above the national average. Most courses and qualifications are appropriate and taught well. Often, students’ post- 16 work builds well on their key stage 4 programmes of study. A minority of sixth-form provision, such as financial studies, is not as strong. Leaders have not considered the way in which this is taught as effectively as other post-16 courses.
p.7
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.8
School details
Type of school Secondary Comprehensive School category Academy converter
p.8
School details
Gender of pupils in 16 to 19 study programmes Mixed
p.8
School details
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,090
p.8
School details
Of which, number on roll in 16 to 19 study programmes Appropriate authority Board of trustees
p.8
School details
Email address paul.ramsey@verulam.herts.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 11–12 October 2017
p.8
Information about this school
The school is part of a consortium with Sandringham School and Beaumont School known as ‘BeauSandVer’. After the previous inspection, the school began working with the Alban Academies Trust. It formally joined the trust in September 2018. The chief executive officer of the Alban Academies Trust is accountable to the trust board for the quality of provision across the trust. The trust board delegates responsibility for individual schools to local governing bodies. The headteacher of Verulam School is responsible for the strategic leadership of the school and reports to the local governing body. The trust has recently provided support to the school in developing teaching, learning and assessment and in checking the school’s work to improve pupils’ personal development, behaviour and welfare. Some pupils are educated by two other education providers: the Links Academy and Oaklands College. The school is a larger than average secondary school serving the area of St Albans.
p.8
Information about this school
The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is below the national average. The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is above average. The proportion who have an education, health and care plan to support their needs is lower than the national average. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is above the national average.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors met with the headteacher and other leaders and teachers across the school. They met with members of the local governing body and the chief executive officer of the Alban Academies Trust, as well as speaking with a representative from the local authority. Inspectors visited parts of 68 lessons, sometimes accompanied by leaders, and reviewed the work of pupils in their books. They visited two assemblies and registration groups for Years 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12. Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation including leaders’ evaluation of the school and improvement plans. They looked at safeguarding records, risk assessments and governing body minutes of meetings. Inspectors also considered the school’s information on pupils’ progress, attendance and behaviour. Inspectors considered the 407 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and spoke to a large number of pupils in formal groups, during their free time and
p.10
Inspection team
Andrew Hemmings, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Susan Sutton Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion