Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

New Generation Nursery

Inspected 5 Jun 2017 · URN EY437644

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    New Generation Nursery Limited

  • Group reference verified

    RP905806

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Jun 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Siobhan O'Callaghan

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    E3 3EY

  • Name on report verified

    New Generation Nursery

  • URN verified

    EY437644

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−62Very criticalmore positive than 20% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progresseffectivethrivestrong relationshipssafeenjoyengagingaccurate
Criticisminadequateweakpoorineffectivenot effectivenot effectivelyconcernsbreach

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings677w−71
  • Leadership222w−62
  • What needs to improve321w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,201
longer than usual (typical 907)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 7
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 37%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

New Generation Nursery Priestman Point, 2B Rainhill Way, LONDON, E3 3EY

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 5 June 2017 7 December 2016

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The provider and manager continue to breach the requirements of registration. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate the necessary capacity to improve the provision. This is because the provider has been unable to initiate or sustain improvements following a previous inadequate inspection and Ofsted enforcement action.  The provider and manager have not implemented effective systems to monitor the quality of the provision, including the quality of teaching and learning. Teaching is weak and some children fail to meet their developmental milestones.  The key person system is not effective in meeting children's individual needs. This is because some staff do not engage well with their key children or their parents and carers to support the children's learning and care needs.  Staff are not always deployed effectively to meet the needs of children. They do not consistently monitor or seem to understand potential risks in the environment. This

p.1

This provision is inadequate

means that children are exposed to risks that could cause them harm.  Children who are showing signs of developmental delay do not receive timely interventions from outside professionals to help them make progress. In addition, the assessment of children’s progress is poor, including progress checks for children aged two. This means appropriate next steps are not set to help children make progress.  Partnership with parents is ineffective because they are not given accurate information about their children's progress or about the overall quality of the setting.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children enjoy healthy snacks and meals that support their health and well-being.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure staff receive effective induction and supervision that provides support, coaching and training, in particular to help them understand their roles and responsibilities to manage health and safety matters and improve the quality of teaching 19/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure the key person system is effective so that every child’s care is tailored to meet their individual needs and key persons build strong relationships with children’s parents 19/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure staffing arrangements meet the needs of all children and ensure their safety 19/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure children are not exposed to risks 19/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that accurate information is shared with parents about the quality of the provision, this specifically refers to information that is advertised to parents on the nursery website. 19/06/2017 To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure appropriate assessment arrangements are in place to monitor children's progress 30/06/2017

p.3

Due Date

 ensure effective systems are in place to take swift action when there are emerging concerns about children's learning and development. This must involve parents and where appropriate other relevant professionals 30/06/2017

p.3

Due Date

 ensure the required progress check is completed for all children between the ages of two and three years and provide parents with a short written summary of their child's development 30/06/2017

p.3

Due Date

 ensure staff work with parents to find out what children know and can do already when they first start at nursery and use this information along with observations of learning to plan for what children need to learn next 30/06/2017

p.3

Due Date

 ensure that the provider/manager monitor the quality of teaching and the impact of this on all children’s learning more closely, so that children make good progress and any gaps in their learning are quickly identified and addressed. 30/06/2017

p.3

Inspection activities

 This inspection was carried out to assess the overall quality of the provision and compliance with enforcement actions following the last inspection.  The inspector observed children and staff during activities both indoors and out in the garden.  The inspector talked with staff and children and held a meeting with the manager of the setting.  The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager of the setting.  The inspector spoke with parents during the inspection and took account of their views.  The inspector reviewed a sample of children's records, planning documentation, evidence of suitability of staff working in the setting and a range of other documentation.

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

The provider and manager do not effectively implement the requirements of the early years foundation stage. They have failed to improve the quality of the provision since the last inspection. There has been some effort to introduce supervision for staff, however, the impact of this on the quality of the provision is yet to be seen. The arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective. Although staff have an appropriate knowledge of child protection procedures and understand what to do if they have concerns about a child’s welfare, they do not monitor risks in the environment to ensure that children are kept safe. The procedures for monitoring the educational programmes are weak. Staff are recording incidental observations of children’s engagement in activities, however, they have no systems in place to assess children’s levels of development. This means that they are not clear as to whether children are meeting, failing to meet, or exceeding their

p.4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

expected developmental milestones. The impact of this weakness in teaching is that some children who require extra help are failing to thrive in this environment. These children do not receive the support they need from outside professionals to help them make good progress. In addition, parents are not supported to engage in open discussions about their children’s development, or how they can be involved in supporting their children’s learning at home.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

The quality of teaching overall is poor. Staff working with younger children spend a lot of time managing routines rather than engaging in quality interactions with the children. This means that children are not effectively supported to develop new skills as they too often play by themselves. In addition, some children were observed to have little or no interaction from their key person, which demonstrates that attachments are not secure. Older children are developing some skills to support their move to school. They are able to access their environment independently and make choices about their play. They can count and recognise familiar numbers. Some children are able to write their names independently although staff teach them to write in capital letters rather than lower case ones. Overall, children do not receive effective challenges to help them make good progress. This is because assessment systems are not in place to help plan for children’s

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

learning. Staff do not extend children’s language by asking open questions and encouraging them to think. They do not provide repetition of language for younger children so that they can listen and learn new words. The impact of this lack of good quality interaction is that some children do not speak at all while at nursery.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

Weaknesses in leadership and management mean that children's welfare is not assured. Staff do not effectively identify potential risks in the environment to keep children safe. They allow children to play in the outdoor area with no socks and shoes on. This is a time when children ride heavy bikes and scooters so they could potentially injure their feet. Although children generally behave well staff miss opportunities to teach children how to behave in safe ways. For example, when children crash their bikes into one another staff do not explain the risks to their welfare. This means that accidents occur and children get hurt. In addition, staff do not take prompt action to clean wet floors following water play and children are observed to slip and fall.

p.4

Outcomes for children are inadequate

Not all children make adequate progress in their learning and development. This is because they do not experience good quality teaching. In addition, their individual needs are not adequately assessed to ensure appropriate support is in place to help them make good progress. Older children are developing basic independence skills as they begin to manage their personal care needs such as visiting the bathroom and washing their hands without support.

p.5

Setting details

Unique reference number EY437644 Local authority Tower Hamlets Inspection number 1084498 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 0 - 5 Total number of places 34 Number of children on roll 22 Name of registered person New Generation Nursery Limited

p.6

reference number

Date of previous inspection 7 December 2016 Telephone number 02089804700

p.6

reference number

New Generation Nursery (Bow) is one of three nurseries operated by New Generation Nursery Limited and registered in 2011. This nursery operates from within the premises of Priestman Point Community Centre, in Bow, within the London borough of Tower Hamlets. The nursery is situated on the first floor, with access by stairs and a lift. The children have the use of three play areas and associated facilities. The nursery operates from 7.30am to 6.45pm, throughout the year, except bank holidays. The nursery has places for children who speak English an additional language. The nursery receives funding for the provision of free early education for three and four year old children. There are seven members of staff, three of whom hold an early years degree. All remaining staff, including the manager, hold early years qualifications.

p.6

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.7

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion