Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder EY402584
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
30 Jan 2017
- Inspectors verified
Nikki Whinton
- Early years verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY402584
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder does not have effective systems in place to identify weaknesses in her p.1
- The childminder fails to assess children's starting points or their progress. p.1
- Weaknesses identified at the last inspection have not been fully addressed. p.3
- Her understanding remains poor, which impacts on the quality of teaching and children's learning. p.3
- The childminder's poor understanding of how young children learn means that some planned activities are not appropriate for p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The environment is secure, clean and suitable for children to use. p.3
- The childminder completes risk assessments both within the home and when on outings, in order to minimise risks. p.3
- Children learn how to keep themselves safe. p.3
- For example, they learn how to sit properly when travelling by bus and not to put toys in their mouths. p.3
- She has carefully considered how to evacuate the building in an emergency. p.3
- However, the childminder has not shared these procedures with the children. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment9
“The quality of teaching is inadequate.” p.1Safeguarding3
“Safeguarding is effective.” p.3Staff development3
“practice and support her professional development.” p.1Records & policies3
“Children are not made aware of the emergency evacuation procedures.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 878
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 30 January 2017 18 August 2016
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The quality of teaching is inadequate. The childminder does not have a secure understanding of the learning and development requirements, in particular how to focus her teaching of younger children in order to meet their individual developmental needs. The childminder fails to assess children's starting points or their progress. This means she does not identify each child's capabilities, needs or stages of development. Consequently, she is unable to plan suitably challenging activities to maximise their learning. Parents are not involved in supporting their children's learning. The childminder does not seek information from parents about children's prior achievements or their on-going progress at home. As a result, the childminder does not know children's stages of development. Children are not made aware of the emergency evacuation procedures. The childminder does not have effective systems in place to identify weaknesses in her
p.1
This provision is inadequate
practice and support her professional development.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children have secure, positive attachments with the friendly childminder. As a result, they are emotionally secure and ready to learn. Parents are complimentary about the level of care provided. They confirm their children enjoy attending, describing the childminder as flexible and cheerful.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
implement a programme of professional development to improve knowledge of the learning and development requirements and drive improvement 20/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
consider children's individual needs, interests and stages of development and use this information to plan challenging and enjoyable experiences, with a clear focus on the prime areas of learning for younger children 20/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
involve parents in their children's learning and development by encouraging them to share information about what their children know and can do, both when they start at the setting and on an on-going basis 20/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve the arrangements for promoting children's safety, by making sure they are familiar with the emergency evacuation procedures 20/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
develop systems for evaluating and improving the quality of the provision, including through seeking contributions from parents, carers and children. 20/03/2017
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the support for children's learning. The inspector talked to the childminder at convenient times during the inspection to assess how well she plans for children's learning. The inspector looked at a range of documentation, including accident records, attendance registers, policies and procedures. The inspector looked at areas of the home used for childminding and assessed how well children are kept safe, and whether their learning and development needs are fully met. The inspector took account of written feedback provided by parents.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Weaknesses identified at the last inspection have not been fully addressed. Although the childminder has improved the suitability and safety of the environment, she has not shown the same focus towards improving her knowledge of the learning and development requirements. She has not taken any action, such as by completing training, to increase her awareness of how to assess children's progress and plan for their future development. Her understanding remains poor, which impacts on the quality of teaching and children's learning. The childminder has recently started to evaluate the quality of her practice. However, she does not seek the views of parents or children to gain a full picture of what she needs to do to improve. Safeguarding is effective. The childminder has a clear understanding of her safeguarding responsibilities. She knows what to do if concerned about a child's welfare or in the event of an allegation being made against her or a
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The quality of teaching has not improved since the last inspection. The childminder does not identify children's starting points in their learning and development. Nor does she seek contributions from parents about children's prior achievements, either when they first start or return to her care after an extended absence. The childminder does not assess children's on-going progress. She does not ask parents about what their child knows and can do, in order to accurately identify their capabilities or plan the next steps for their development. As a result, children are not well prepared for the next stage in their learning. Discussions with parents are primarily focused on children's care needs. This means that parents are not kept informed about what their child is learning or how they can help them continue their learning at home. The childminder's poor understanding of how young children learn means that some planned activities are not appropriate for
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
children's levels of understanding. For example, very young children are asked to compare items by weight, without establishing whether children understand the concepts of lighter or heavier. Children are not always given the time they need to consider questions posed, before the childminder gives them the answer. For example, during the inspection, the childminder rolled out two lengths of play dough and asked which is the longest, before immediately giving the children the answer.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
The environment is secure, clean and suitable for children to use. The childminder completes risk assessments both within the home and when on outings, in order to minimise risks. Children learn how to keep themselves safe. For example, they learn how to sit properly when travelling by bus and not to put toys in their mouths. She has carefully considered how to evacuate the building in an emergency. However, the childminder has not shared these procedures with the children.
p.3
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Children do not make the best possible progress because of the significant weaknesses in teaching, which does not meet children's needs. However, children explore their surroundings confidently. When they are able to make their own choices, they enjoy selecting from a suitable range of age appropriate resources. Children gain some independence skills, such as by wiping their faces and hands after eating. Children behave well and through the childminder's gentle guidance learn how to interact positively with others.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY402584 Local authority Oxfordshire Inspection number 1080095 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 8 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 3
p.5
Name of registered person
Date of previous inspection 18 August 2016
p.5
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 2010. She lives in the village of Long Hanborough, near Witney in Oxfordshire. The childminder works from Monday to Friday for most of the year.
p.5
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion