Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Oct 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steffi Penny

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Steffi Penny

  • Postcode verified

    EX13 8BB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+77Very positivemore positive than 78% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progresssuccessfulhigh-qualityeffectivelyenjoyenthusiasmclear
Criticismmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings461w+69
  • Leadership101w+69
  • What needs to improve90w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
643
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr C Salmon Headteacher Musbury Community School Church Hill Musbury Axminster Devon EX13 8BB

p.1

technology (D&T)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils during my visit on 13 September 2010 to look at work in D&T.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of two lessons.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The overall effectiveness of D&T is good.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

 Before they join the school, pupils’ experience of modelling is very mixed. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage develop very good levels of independence. They learn basic skills and develop good design and making capabilities.  Pupils make good progress in lessons. They learn to work in teams, demonstrate good reasoning skills and develop autonomy. They can demonstrate how to make good decisions, plan effectively, evaluate carefully and have the confidence to raise questions of their own. For example, they gain a good understanding about the importance of aerodynamics in the design of rockets and how a change in air pressure brings about propulsion. They do this by evaluating the shape and design of space rockets through research, practical demonstrations and their own investigations. Most pupils can easily plan a project once given a design brief.

p.1

Quality of teaching of D&T

 Teachers have a good understanding about the nature of D&T and its relevance to the world. Outstanding practice is emerging in teaching and learning. All pupils enjoy their lessons and see themselves as successful designers and makers.  Very good adult support is provided for pupils for whom manual dexterity and hand-eye coordination present a challenge. A wide range of learning resources, good planning, adult confidence and enthusiasm ensures pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

The quality of the curriculum in D&T is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

 Cross-curricular projects are successful in consolidating pupils’ learning. For example, pupils develop their knowledge of electricity and circuits and use this in models such as making torches. D&T activities also complement and enhance the development of numeracy skills where their knowledge of fractional parts and ratios is used to calculate quantities of ingredients in food technology.  The application of knowledge related to the world of work, engineering, science and sport is planned carefully. However, opportunities are missed to prepare pupils for an increasingly technological society by ensuring that they have experience of investigating technologically advanced materials that respond to their surroundings.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

Leadership and management in D&T are outstanding.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

 Your visits to other schools, including those in Switzerland and France, to share best practice ensure that teachers are kept up to date with current thinking in D&T. The partnership work with the local grammar school ensures that gifted and talented pupils and those in Years 5 and 6 have high-quality extended D&T experiences through working with the sixth formers on projects using computer-aided design and manufacture.  Self-evaluation is good. Monitoring and evaluation are securely established with a clear focus on learning and raising attainment. Planning for health and safety is secure.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring pupils have more opportunities to experience materials that have responsive properties so that they that can be significantly changed in a controlled fashion by external stimuli.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion