Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Oct 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christopher Keeler

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christopher Keeler

  • Postcode verified

    YO7 3DL

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh expectationsmake good progresseffectiveimprovingaccuratelyclear
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
639
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Lyon Headteacher Dishforth Airfield Community Primary School Short Road Dishforth Airfield Thirsk YO7 3DL

p.1

families

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 29 and 30 June 2010 to look at the school’s contribution to the quality of provision and partnerships for children and young people who are in families of service personnel.

p.1

families

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of partnerships, including the quality of the partnerships between schools and agencies and between schools and parents, I looked at how effective the partnerships are in improving children and young people’s personal wellbeing and learning. I also considered the nature of the support given to these children, including those in the most vulnerable circumstances, or those who have a particular special educational need or disability, and the arrangements to ensure the continuity of provision during children’s move in and out of your school.

p.1

families

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

families

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: discussions with you, the chair of governors, staff, parents, pupils and representatives of support agencies; and an analysis of data and school documentation, including school self-evaluation and the school improvement plan.

p.1

families

The school’s contribution to the quality of provision and partnerships for children and young people who are in families of service personnel is good.

p.1

Key features

 The school works hard to welcome new pupils and their families to Dishforth, although not all of the pupils feel adequately prepared for the transfer.  Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, make good progress. This is because the school has high expectations and sets out to ensure that all pupils achieve their potential.  School leaders do not view the needs of the pupil in isolation. Good support is given to the family to enhance pupils’ emotional and intellectual development.  The relationships between parents and school staff are good. The school operates an ‘open door’ policy to listen to parental concerns and offer appropriate advice and guidance. Parents feel that they are well received on arrival and are kept informed about their children’s progress.  Early assessment on arrival at the school is a feature of the provision. As a result, work is matched accurately to pupils’ needs and this enhances their

p.2

Key features

progress. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities receive good support. Individual education plans are in place and pupils’ progress is monitored carefully.  The school has established good links with external agencies, particularly the Parent Support Adviser (PSA) who works closely with families experiencing personal difficulties. Clear links exist between the work of the PSA and the school and an improvement in pupils’ attitudes, behaviour and progress.  The transfer of records between schools, both within the United Kingdom and from abroad, is often problematic. School leaders recognise the importance of working closely with other schools that have a significant proportion of pupils from service families to ensure the smooth transition of records from one school to another, and to support the continuity of provision for pupils.  The transfer of information between associated professionals is sometimes

p.2

Key features

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop the work with children and young people and their parents who are in families of service personnel.

p.2

Key features

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website under the URN for your school. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion