Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Jul 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Liam Trippier

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Liam Trippier

  • Postcode verified

    ST10 1EN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+94Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelystrongoutstandingmake good progresshigh-qualityenthusiasmconsistentconfidently
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings489w+93
  • Leadership167w+78
  • What needs to improve103w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
739
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%Leadership 19%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Prescott Headteacher Cheadle Primary School The Avenue Cheadle Stoke-on-Trent ST10 1EN

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: geography

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 30 June 2010 to look at work in geography.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of parts of five lessons; and a learning walk through the school.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The overall effectiveness of geography is good.

p.1

Achievement in geography

 Pupils make good progress from starting points that are below those found typically. By the time pupils leave Year 6, they achieve broadly average standards. However, fewer than expected numbers of pupils reach the higher levels of attainment.  Pupils demonstrate a good understanding of the localities studied, particularly those in other continents, as they have developed a good sense of what it is like to live there through their international studies.  Pupils use information and communication technology well to research themes. They work effectively and with independence when finding out about different countries and the issues facing people there.  Pupils’ behaviour in lessons is often outstanding. This makes a strong contribution to the quality of their learning. They participate fully and show high levels of enthusiasm.

p.1

Quality of teaching of geography

The quality of teaching in geography is good with some outstanding features.

p.2

Quality of teaching of geography

 Teachers plan lessons effectively, based upon assessment information and adapted curriculum plans, to meet most pupils’ needs well. However, not all pupils that are capable of higher levels are challenged enough.  Teaching assistants support different groups of pupils sensitively to ensure all participate fully. They also guide those with special educational needs and/or disabilities effectively.  High-quality oral feedback to pupils helps them to develop more sophisticated thinking. For example, younger pupils classified different buildings in a seaside town, viewed on an interactive whiteboard, and located these accurately on a map. The teacher clarified their responses expertly throughout the lesson and provided several good opportunities for them to reflect and develop their geographical understanding.  Some examples of teachers’ marking in pupils’ workbooks provide strong guidance on how they can improve their work. However, this is not

p.2

Quality of teaching of geography

consistent throughout the school.  Assessment for learning strategies are used particularly well to identify pupils’ misconceptions. Teachers have good subject knowledge which enables them to tackle these confidently.  Pupils enjoy their geography lessons, particularly when teachers use good- quality resources to make lessons memorable.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in geography

The quality of the curriculum in geography is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in geography

 The curriculum meets statutory requirements. It uses a combination of structured units, strong international studies, fieldwork and cross- curricular themes effectively to interest pupils and develop their skills, knowledge and understanding in a coherent and logical sequence.  The school has reviewed its curriculum and recognises that some older units of work are less relevant to pupils’ current lives. They have suitable plans in place to tackle this issue.  The Eco Council and gardening club provide good opportunities for pupils to contribute positively to their school and local environment. Pupils are well aware of the need to reduce their carbon footprint through recycling and reducing energy use.  High-quality geography displays contribute well to the school’s attractive and effective learning environment.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

The effectiveness of leadership and management in geography is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

 The geography coordinator conducts a wide range of monitoring activities to inform future action plans with appropriate priorities. Leaders know the strengths and areas for development. However, some assessment information is not quantified and summarised sufficiently to show patterns and trends over time or to precisely identify areas for future development.  Leaders have developed a strong system of accountability to ensure geography is promoted effectively in the school. Staff are well trained and pupils make good progress.  The coordinator attends the local geography cluster group and informs staff of latest developments. The local authority provides good support for developing geography in the school. The school also uses the support of the professional associations to provide guidance for the coordinator.  Teachers deliver the curriculum well and they are supported effectively by the coordinator and senior leaders. A useful portfolio of work has been

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

developed to inform teachers of progression in geography throughout the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 raising attainment further by:  developing a consistent approach to marking in geography  planning clearly differentiated tasks in lessons to enable more pupils to reach higher levels  improving the use of assessment data to inform precise actions in future subject plans.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop geography in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website under the URN for your school. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion