Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Jacqueline White
- Postcode verified
TN21 9AE
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop assessment in your school. p.2
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website under the URN for your school. p.2
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 563
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 37, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs C Harvey Headteacher All Saints’ and St Richard’s CofE Primary School School Hill Old Heathfield Heathfield TN21 9AE
p.1
progress (APP)
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 22 June 2010 to evaluate the impact of the APP initiative.
p.1
progress (APP)
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
progress (APP)
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: scrutiny of documentation; observations of teaching and learning; and discussions with senior leaders, staff, pupils, and a representative from the local authority.
p.1
progress (APP)
The overall use of assessment to support learning is good.
p.1
Impact on pupils’ achievement and attainment
The increased accuracy of teachers’ assessment and their deeper understanding of progression are contributing to raising pupils’ achievement. Standards have risen considerably since the school’s institutional inspection in 2008. Pupils, including those groups who were underachieving, are now making better progress. APP has improved the rigour of target-setting at a whole-school level. In addition, targets for individual pupils are more subject-specific. However, in some cases, when they are achieved, they are not revised quickly enough.
p.1
Impact on the quality of pupils’ learning and progress
The school is using APP criteria well to identify gaps in pupils’ learning and tailor interventions that will tackle them. APP is helping to improve teachers’ subject knowledge. Consequently, teachers are more able to clarify the component skills and understanding that add up to successful learning. Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, are benefiting from this precision. APP has increased the consistency of the school’s assessment practice. It has encouraged the school to share pupils’ learning targets with parents to help them support their children’s learning more effectively. As a result of using APP, teachers are more focused on pupils’ ability to evaluate their own and each other’s work. Pupils have good access to clear success criteria in lessons to help them assess the quality of their work.
p.1
support learning
APP has reinforced a collective accountability for pupils’ progress. Teachers and teaching assistants are more systematic in maximising the progress of all pupils. The professional dialogue instigated by APP has been highly beneficial. A shared language for assessment is enabling teachers to discuss pupils’ learning across the phases which sustains their progress through points of transition. Moderation is a well-established practice in the school. However, formal opportunities for teachers to arrive at judgements about the quality of pupils’ work through collaboration are limited. Teachers have gained confidence and expertise in using assessment information to plan learning that builds on pupils’ capabilities and understanding.
p.2
Impact on the curriculum
A better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in pupils’ learning is assisting teachers in personalising the curriculum and developing pupils’ engagement with learning. APP is helping teachers to map assessment opportunities across the curriculum.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
ensuring the timely revision of pupils’ targets creating regular opportunities for teachers to jointly evaluate pupils’ work.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop assessment in your school.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website under the URN for your school. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. Yours sincerely
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion