Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Gill Jones
- Postcode verified
CW7 1JL
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils are generally well behaved, but where teaching is inadequate, they lack attention and fail to learn new skills and concepts. p.2
- Teaching time is not always used effectively and consequently, staff miss some opportunities to ensure that children make better than expected progress, particularly in their speaking and listening skills. p.2
- As a result, pupils’ learning habits in Year 1 and 2 remain poor. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 650
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 1 16 September 2010
p.1
Mr Simon Kidwell Headteacher Darnhall Primary School Sandyhill Road Winsford Cheshire CW7 1JL
p.1
Primary School
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 13 September 2010, for the time you gave to our discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection . During my visit, I scrutinised school documentation, including pupils' progress and attainment data, looked at pupils’ exercise books, met with staff and pupils and observed eight lessons. Since the last inspection, three teachers have left the school and these are replaced by new staff.
p.1
Primary School
As a result of the inspection on 9 and 10 March 2009, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.
p.1
Primary School
Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.
p.1
Primary School
Since the last inspection, you and your deputy headteacher have secured improved levels of attainment by pupils in mathematics, English and science at the end of Key Stage 2. The majority of pupils leaving Year 6 in 2010 attained in line with or above the national average for 11 year olds. They made rapid progress in the upper part of the school and this cohort of pupils achieved well. However, the school’s own data show that there is still a significant level of underachievement. This is because of consistently low attainment in Key Stage 1, where standards in reading, writing and mathematics remain well below those expected nationally for seven-year-olds. Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566930 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email : gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com
p.1
PROTECT-INSPECTION
September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 2 Pupils in Key Stage 1 are working well below their capabilities. Some staff expectations of what pupils can achieve remain low. Consequently, the work set in lessons lacks challenge and does not accurately match pupils’ abilities. Pupils are generally well behaved, but where teaching is inadequate, they lack attention and fail to learn new skills and concepts. As a result, pupils’ learning habits in Year 1 and 2 remain poor. However, consistently good and better teaching in Year 2 is ensuring that these pupils are now making rapid progress, particularly in mathematics, reading and handwriting.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
The new Early Years Foundation Stage leader has a clear understanding of what Darnhall children need to learn in order to prepare them well for Key Stage 1. The new outdoor provision is well suited to this purpose. Staff plan daily learning activities which cover a range of children’s skills and abilities. However, these do not link closely enough to the individual assessment information held by the school. Teaching time is not always used effectively and consequently, staff miss some opportunities to ensure that children make better than expected progress, particularly in their speaking and listening skills.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
You and your senior leadership team hold an accurate view of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. With the support of the governing body and local authority, it has secured improved outcomes for pupils, particularly in the upper part of the school. Consequently, the school continues to demonstrate a satisfactory capacity to sustain improvement.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 3
p.3
place in March 2009
Raise standards in English, especially handwriting and spelling, and in mathematics and science. More consistently match work to the needs of pupils in Key Stage 1 and for those who are more able. Improve outdoor provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage to enhance children's development in all areas of their learning.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion