Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Olson Davis (lead), Sue Frater
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Olson Davis, Sue Frater
- Postcode verified
N1 2UT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,445
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 35, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr M Britt Headteacher Canonbury Primary School Canonbury Road London N1 2UT
p.1
Special measures: monitoring inspection of Canonbury Primary School
Following my visit with Olson Davis, Additional Inspector, to your school on 28–29 September 2010, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.
p.1
Special measures: monitoring inspection of Canonbury Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in March 2010. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.
p.1
Special measures: monitoring inspection of Canonbury Primary School
Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory.
p.1
Special measures: monitoring inspection of Canonbury Primary School
Newly Qualified Teachers may be appointed.
p.1
Special measures: monitoring inspection of Canonbury Primary School
This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.1
Special measures: monitoring inspection of Canonbury Primary School
I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the Chair of Governors and the Director of Children’s Services for Islington and Cambridge Education@Islington.
p.1
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Tribal 1-4 Portland Square BRISTOL BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0845 123 6001 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : Fiona.allan1@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Evidence
Inspectors observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the headteacher, senior and subject leaders, groups of pupils, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative from the local authority.
p.2
Context
At the time of the school’s section 5 inspection in March, the headteacher had been in post for two weeks. The term following the inspection saw the departure of a significant number of teaching and support staff and the appointment of new staff. The senior leadership team was replaced with two new deputy headteachers and three new senior teachers. In addition, the school’s Director of Standards is being seconded from Cambridge Education@Islington for a year.
p.2
Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
Pupils say they enjoy learning in lessons that develop their independent learning skills, such as problem solving, investigating, researching and role play. Until recently, there have been too few opportunities for developing these skills, especially in mathematics, science, and information and communication technology (ICT). The school is beginning to address this issue so that pupils can progress at their own pace. In the large majority of lessons, most pupils now make satisfactory progress. The more able pupils, however, remain insufficiently challenged to achieve higher levels. As teachers are not using assessments to inform the level of work for individual pupils, standards of attainment vary from year to year and for different groups of pupils. For example, attainment in the national tests at the end of Key Stage 2 dipped in 2008 to well below average. It returned to well above average in 2009, except in science. The school’s data for 2010 indicate another dip, particularly
p.2
Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
for the more able pupils, but attainment would appear to be above average. Attainment in the national assessments at the end of Key Stage 1 has been consistently well above average for the past four years. It is well above average for all groups of pupils except boys, pupils eligible for free school meals and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities or for whom English is an additional language. Until very recently, the school was not identifying these underachieving pupils or providing appropriate intervention for them. Suitable systems are now in place to enable the school to do so.
p.2
Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
While children at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage in 2010 achieved well below age-related expectations, children currently in the Nursery and Reception classes make satisfactory progress. The local authority provides effective support for the new coordinator in developing the curriculum to meet the needs of individual children. As a result, the school is beginning to use assessment information to plan for individual children’s learning and development. The level of challenge and adults’ questioning skills, however, has still to be developed. Any health and safety issues are addressed promptly.
p.2
Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
Progress since the last inspection on the areas for improvement:
p.3
Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
Improve provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage by: - ensuring there is effective leadership and management of the provision - ensuring the curriculum meets the needs of individual children - ensuring that activities challenge children sufficiently and that adults’ questioning develops children’s thinking and extends their learning - using assessment information more rigorously to inform planning and to set high expectations for children’s learning and development - making sure that staff are more vigilant in spotting minor health and safety issues.
p.3
Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
Accelerate pupils’ progress in Years 1 to 6 in order to raise attainment in mathematics, science and ICT – satisfactory progress.
p.3
Other relevant pupil outcomes
Pupils’ behaviour continues to be good. Pupils enjoy coming to school; the school’s data indicate their attendance was high last year. They are very aware of how to adopt safe and healthy lifestyles and they enjoy participating in sport and activities, such as street dance. They make a positive contribution to the school and wider community. For example, the school council is developing a new school uniform and some pupils participated in debating with other schools at the town hall. Pupils develop suitable skills that will support them in their future education and employment, particularly in reading, speaking and listening, although opportunities to develop skills in ICT remain limited. Improvements in the curriculum support their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, as in Year 3 where pupils research world religions. Pupils work together well in lessons.
p.3
The effectiveness of provision
While the quality of teaching in the large majority of lessons is satisfactory, it is becoming more consistent due to the introduction of suitable common formats for planning and marking pupils’ work, and a new learning and teaching policy. Improvements are evident in teachers’ use of learning objectives and success criteria to assess pupils’ progress in lessons. The introduction of curricular targets for literacy and numeracy helps pupils to know how to improve their work. As the system for progress tracking and target setting has only recently been introduced, however, teachers are not setting work at the appropriate level for all pupils, particularly the more able pupils. They are beginning to plan different tasks for groups of pupils in mathematics lessons and to engage them in more practical learning skills, such as problem solving. The school is aware of the need for a more practical approach to science through investigation. All pupils now have ICT lessons,
p.3
The effectiveness of provision
but the curriculum is limited by the lack of resources. The quality of care, guidance and support for pupils remains satisfactory and safeguarding requirements are met.
p.4
The effectiveness of provision
Progress since the last inspection on the areas for improvement:
p.4
The effectiveness of provision
Accelerate pupils’ progress in Years 1 to 6 in order to raise attainment in mathematics, science and ICT by: - eliminating inconsistencies in the quality of teaching so that more of it is consistently good - improving teachers’ use of assessment information to plan work that builds on the previous learning of all groups of pupils - ensuring that the more able pupils are always given suitably challenging work - improving the provision for teaching ICT skills across the school.
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
Leadership and management have been restructured to strengthen the school’s capacity to make the necessary improvements. The impact of the work of the headteacher, deputy headteachers and senior teachers is beginning to be seen in the more consistent approach to teaching and in the improved environment for learning. The improvements are due to the introduction of clear policies and procedures, including performance management of staff. Lesson observations are mostly accurate and focus appropriately on pupils’ progress. While teachers’ planning is monitored regularly, scrutiny of pupils’ work is not in place. A robust system for target setting and monitoring pupils’ progress enables the senior team to evaluate the achievement of all pupils, to identify underachieving groups, and to implement appropriate intervention programmes. The developments are too recent to show any impact on pupils’ achievement at this time. Regular evaluation of the
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
school’s post-inspection action plan and comprehensive Raising Achievement Plan ensures the required improvements are being addressed appropriately.
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
Judgement Progress since the last inspection on the areas for improvement:
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
Develop an effective leadership and management structure across the school and ensure that all staff with leadership and management responsibilities fulfil their roles effectively, especially in improving the quality of teaching and learning – satisfactory.
p.5
External support
The quality and impact of the external support provided for the school by Cambridge Education@Islington, including from the School Improvement Partner, is good. An extensive range of support covers all identified areas for improvement. The school is suitably challenged and held to account for its improvements through the measurable milestones outlined in the Raising Achievement Plan. The Plan addresses satisfactorily the amendments required in the local authority’s statement of action.
p.5
Priorities for further improvement
Ensure teachers use the system for monitoring pupils’ progress, particularly individual targets, to plan work to support and challenge all pupils to make consistently good progress.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion