Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Jul 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gina White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gina White

  • Postcode verified

    DN15 9HB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progressstrongexcellentvery wellenjoyclearclearlyaccurate
Criticismyet tolacknot clearnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings569w+48
  • Leadership83w0
  • What needs to improve101w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
740
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 13%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr A Travis Headteacher Burton-upon-Stather Primary School Flixborough Road Burton-upon-Stather Scunthorpe DN15 9HB

p.1

technology (D&T)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 9 June 2010 to look at work in D&T.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, a governor and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of three lessons.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The overall effectiveness of D&T is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

Pupils’ achievement in D&T is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

 Pupils’ in the Reception class make good progress in developing basic skills to join materials. Most pupils work independently and imaginatively to create products that interest them.  Pupils in all year groups develop skills in designing, making and testing. The school’s recent introduction of skills checklists demonstrates this clearly. Pupils in Key Stage 1 continue to refine making skills but are less clear about who they are designing products for and, as a result, this slows their progress and attainment.  By the end of Key Stage 2, pupils reach the standards expected for their age. This is the result of very strong teaching in the latter years and a firm emphasis on purposeful designing and making that develops their problem-solving skills. Their knowledge of mechanisms and making circuits is strong but their knowledge of control and programming is underdeveloped.  D&T contributes very well to pupils’ personal development. They

p.1

Achievement in D&T

particularly enjoy the challenge of acquiring and mastering practical skills. They follow health, safety and hygiene rules and they mostly make good progress in lessons.

p.2

Quality of teaching of D&T

 Teachers make very good use of resources to support their teaching. For example, they use collections of products, such as toys and musical instruments, to support pupils’ investigation and research. Excellent focused teaching about mechanisms enabled pupils in Year 5 to quickly identify why and how products worked. However, this high level of challenge is not consistent for all pupils in all lessons.  Lessons engage and sustain pupils’ interest. This is particularly clear in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in Year 5, where focused use of teaching assistants is targeted well to support pupils in overcoming difficulties in their learning. In these lessons, pupils are clear about what is expected of them, their attitudes to learning are good and they work with a high level of independence. However, assessment to support learning in D&T is underdeveloped and pupils are not clear about how well they are

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

The quality of the curriculum in D&T is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

 The curriculum meets requirements. It is enriched by visitors and participation in local science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) activities. This makes a very good contribution to developing pupils’ problem-solving and team-working skills. Pupils enjoy the well- planned opportunities to develop their awareness of food and diet.  The school is tackling the lack of resources and training that currently inhibits pupils’ understanding of control and programming. The curriculum review has begun but has yet to identify where opportunities can be strengthened to progressively challenge pupils and promote their independence and achievement of higher standards.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

Leadership and management in D&T are good.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

 Much has been achieved in the short time since the coordinator has taken up the post. This is the result of the investment that you and the governors have made in resources and the professional development of staff. The school’s self-evaluation is accurate and draws upon a broad range of monitoring and evaluation. Action to develop assessment has yet to be implemented sufficiently for leaders to gain a clear overview of pupils’ attainment and progress.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 implementing the assessment system to a clear overview of pupils’ attainment and progress  ensuring lessons are planned to challenge all pupils  reviewing the curriculum to identify where opportunities can be strengthened to promote pupils’ independence, faster progress and higher standards.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website under the URN for your school. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion