Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Jun 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Karen Adriaanse

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Karen Adriaanse

  • Postcode verified

    PO30 5BF

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+49Positivemore positive than 49% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery wellvery highwell-designedsuccessfullyeffectivelyindependentimproving
Criticismweakertoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings626w+44
  • What needs to improve142w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
759
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Miss C Turner Director The Care Learning Centre Suite 8, The Courtyard Monks Brook Newport PO30 5BF

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 27 May 2010 to look at your work in numeracy.

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff, learners and employers; scrutiny of relevant documents; observation of four learning sessions; and visits to four workplaces.

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

Overall, the Care Learning Centre (CLC) is good at tackling the challenge of ensuring that young people and adults gain the numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives.

p.1

Key findings

 The Care Learning Centre is successfully implementing its strategic decision to make numeracy, as well as literacy, an integral part of all its programmes. All teaching, learning and assessment take place in the workplace. Take-up of both Skills for Life subjects by learners on the Train to Gain NVQ in care programme is very high. The CLC has developed very good partnerships with employers to enable them to recognise the benefits of developing learners’ numeracy skills alongside the vocational specialism.  Staff have very effectively integrated the application of number into the apprenticeships and NVQ training. Very well-designed assignments that evaluate learners’ vocational skills include assessment of numeracy skills that are relevant to work in care homes. In this way, apprentices who are exempt from taking the application of number qualification are required to work on the numeracy skills required for their work.

p.1

Key findings

 Managers use the self-assessment process very well to evaluate the health and social care and Skills for Life provision. However, the CLC does not self-assess numeracy as a separate subject. Mangers rely heavily on qualification success rates and monitoring records, such as the individual learning plans, to evaluate the numeracy provision. They do not monitor the quality of teaching, learning and assessment of numeracy well enough. Similarly, the improvement plan does not include the specific actions required to improve the quality of provision.  Teaching and learning in numeracy are satisfactory. All training advisers teach and assess both numeracy and literacy. Only about a third of training advisers are numeracy specialists. In the learning sessions observed, training advisers provided good individual support and used a good range of resources to help learners develop the specific numeracy skills identified as areas for improvement. However, in the weaker

p.2

Key findings

sessions, they did not focus enough on promoting independent learning. They tended to provide too many prompts and did not give learners sufficient time to work out how to tackle a problem for themselves.  The CLC is implementing a well-formulated programme for staff development and training. Managers have arranged for all staff taking part in the teacher-training programme from September 2010 to follow an extended programme which includes training towards a qualification in teaching numeracy at level 4. Sharing of good practice in teaching numeracy and the use of numeracy-related staff development resources are satisfactory.  Overall success rates in Skills for Life on Train to Gain are high and above the national rates, although national figures are not available separately for numeracy and literacy. First-time pass rates in numeracy tests are high. The learners interviewed said they had gained significant confidence

p.2

Key findings

in carrying numeracy tasks at work and in preparation for their tests. They were pleased that they could tackle calculations, such as division and working out percentages, that they had previously found intimidating.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing thorough processes to evaluate all aspects of numeracy teaching, learning and assessment as part of self-assessment and quality improvement  improving the teaching and learning of numeracy to ensure that learners become more independent so that they continue to develop their understanding of mathematical thinking and their ability to complete numeracy related tasks after they have completed their programmes  implementing the staff development plans to develop the expertise of training advisers in teaching numeracy.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop numeracy at the Care Learning Centre. As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and the Skills Funding Agency and will be published on the Ofsted website under the URN for your organisation. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion