Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Aug 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Clary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Heather Clary

  • Postcode verified

    NG5 4AH

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+66Positivemore positive than 64% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progresseffectivelyeffectivepositiveimprovedconfident
Criticismnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings540w+66
  • What needs to improve116w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
650
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Yarham Director Young Peoples’ Learning and Skills, Children & Families Sandfield Centre Sandfield Road Lenton NG5 4AH

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 29 and 30 June 2010 to look at your work in numeracy.

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with senior staff, tutors and learners; observations of numeracy learning sessions; and a review of the supporting documentation you provided.

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

Overall, Nottingham City Council is good at tackling the challenge of ensuring that young people and adults gain the numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives.

p.1

Key findings

 The council is making very good progress in setting up numeracy provision in communities identified as having the greatest need. It works very effectively with an extensive range of organisations in the public and private sectors to broaden the range of numeracy provision, especially family numeracy programmes. Take-up of numeracy programmes is good. However, strategic documents do not include sufficient detail of the council’s plans for developing its numeracy provision.  The council has good arrangements to monitor the quality of its provision, including the family learning provision contracted to local colleges. Managers use data particularly well to monitor the programmes and the council has developed effective processes to review and record learners’ progress. Staff make good use of the frequent opportunities to share good practice in teaching numeracy and exchange learning resources, particularly in family numeracy. Although staff teaching family numeracy

p.1

Key findings

are well qualified, not enough tutors, teaching numeracy on the council’s Entry to Employment (E2E) programmes, have the appropriate qualifications.  Teaching and learning are satisfactory overall. Positive features of the teaching and learning sessions observed included good use of a wide range of practical resources to help learners develop their understanding of numeracy concepts. Tutors used group discussions well to help learners understand number-based problems in relevant and meaningful ways. In the less effective sessions, tutors did not check learners’ understanding of the numerical processes they were using or reinforce numeracy concepts as they came up during the sessions. In E2E, vocational tutors make good use of the sessions to embed teaching and learning in vocational contexts, but they do not make sufficient use of learner’s individual numeracy targets when planning learning sessions and individual learning activities

p.2

Key findings

 Learners achieve well. Pass rates are good in family numeracy. Learners interviewed said they had gained confidence in carrying out numeracy tasks and were making more use of these skills in daily life and at work. They felt they had improved their employment prospects and were better able to support their children’s numeracy development. E2E learners interviewed said they enjoyed numeracy sessions, particularly the practical activities and the tutors’ explanations about calculations. They felt more confident in using their skills and found the opportunity to gain qualifications particularly motivating. In 2008/09, overall pass rates were high.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 implementing its appropriate training programme in numeracy to enhance the expertise of staff teaching numeracy on E2E programmes, including those teaching numeracy embedded in vocational contexts  implementing a system to ensure that all staff teaching on E2E programmes have easy access to learners’ individual learning plans when planning learning and reviewing learners’ progress.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop numeracy at Nottingham City Council

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to the Skills Funding Agency and will be published on the Ofsted website under the URN for your organisation. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion