Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 21 Jun 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Vic Chivers

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Vic Chivers

  • Postcode verified

    RG20 9HP

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+57Positivemore positive than 55% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenteffectivelyindependent
Criticismnot sufficiently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings413w+57
  • What needs to improve113w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
517
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 27, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 21%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms S Rogers Headteacher The Clere School Earlstone Common Burghclere Newbury RG20 9HP

p.1

education

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 27 and 28 April 2010 to look at work in business education.

p.1

education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

education

As no examination courses in business studies are provided specifically, the visit focused on the wider provision the school is making to develop students’ enterprise capabilities and their understanding of economics, business and personal finance.

p.1

education

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of eight lessons and a Young Enterprise team meeting.

p.1

education

The overall effectiveness of the provision to develop students’ enterprise skills and understanding of economics, business and personal finance is satisfactory with good features.

p.1

Main findings

 Students develop a reasonable understanding of economics, business and personal finance by the end of Year 11. For example, many have a basic understanding of loans, taxation, inflation and profit. Students attending vocational courses gain an insight into various business practices.  Students develop good enterprise skills through a good range of enrichment and ‘challenge’ activities. Most participate well in raising funds for charities.  Students have very good attitudes to learning and behaviour in lessons is excellent. Many show good levels of self-confidence and independent learning skills.  In Key Stage 3, opportunities for students to develop their economic and business understanding and personal financial capability are adequate.  The programme of work-related learning at Key Stage 4 is well organised, including two weeks of work experience for all students. Preparation and follow-up are well organised and thorough. During their placements,

p.1

Main findings

students are encouraged to explore business structures and job roles.  Several subjects are making good attempts to embed economic and business understanding in the curriculum, having identified, for example, global, personal finance and enterprise themes. However, in the lessons observed and the curriculum plans scrutinised, intended learning outcomes were not sufficiently explicit to support this development work effectively.  Various different groups of students have very good opportunities to engage directly with employers. These could be extended to benefit all students.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 making the provision more coherent to develop students’ economic, business and financial understanding and enterprise capabilities by:  making intended learning outcomes explicit in the curriculum  ensuring lesson planning and students’ progress are monitored as they move through the school

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 providing more frequent opportunities for all students to engage with employers.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop business education in the school.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website under the URN for your school. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion