Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Jun 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gina White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gina White

  • Postcode verified

    YO61 4QA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveenjoywell ledaccuratelyenjoymentstrengthssecureaccurate
Criticismlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings511w+63
  • Leadership139w+75
  • What needs to improve85w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
725
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Leadership 19%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms R Bainbridge Headteacher Husthwaite Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Low Street Husthwaite YO61 4QA

p.1

technology (D&T)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 30 April 2010 to look at work in D&T.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, parents and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of one lesson.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The overall effectiveness of D&T is satisfactory with good features.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

Pupils’ achievement in D&T is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

 Pupils’ learning in the Early Years Foundation Stage provides a firm base for the development of their D&T skills. They develop their understanding of how to use basic tools, such as scissors and construction kits, to make the things they see around them. By the end of Key Stage 1, pupils learn to develop decision-making skills and clarify their ideas by identifying what works well and improvements they could make to the products they make. Pupils make satisfactory progress so that they reach the standards expected for their age by Year 6 and develop a secure understanding of mechanisms, circuits and control.  Pupils enjoy and are highly motivated by their designing and making. They are developing cooking skills and an awareness of healthier food choices. Pupils use tools and equipment accurately. They are aware of the risks to themselves and others and understand the reasons for health and safety

p.1

Quality of teaching of D&T

The quality of teaching in D&T is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching of D&T

 Teachers have a good understanding and knowledge of technical skills to support pupils in making their products work. Teachers’ development of writing frames supports pupils’ evaluation skills satisfactorily. The oldest pupils are developing effective analytical skills to trace and rectify faults to refine and develop the way their products work. This is well demonstrated in the working fairground rides they have made. Pupils enjoy learning from others and seeing their work inspires their ideas.  Assessment is developing well and the current trials to develop a better overview of pupils’ progress are modelled well by the D&T coordinator.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

The quality of the curriculum in D&T is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

 Curriculum planning is good and progressively challenges pupils. Older pupils can see how they are expected to draw upon their scientific knowledge to make more complex products. The breadth of the D&T curriculum meets pupils’ needs appropriately. It is enriched through a range of activities such as ‘tetrahedron day’, competitions to design a school dinner and through challenges to develop pupils’ awareness of fairtrade and the use of good-quality food ingredients.  Opportunities to make further use of computers to develop pupils’ information and communication technology skills and to extend their knowledge of systems and control are accurately identified by the school.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

Leadership and management in D&T are good.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

 The effective management of D&T is firmly demonstrated in the care and priority given to good resources, health and safety and the support provided for teachers’ professional development. D&T makes an effective contribution to pupils’ learning. Parents and pupils value the contribution it makes to pupils’ enjoyment of school and the development of innovative ideas and making skills. However, there is further scope to ensure parents are aware of the purpose of D&T and its progressive use throughout the school to prepare pupils for their roles in an increasingly technological society.  D&T is well led and the school has made good use of national and local guidance to develop accurate assessment. Leaders know the strengths and areas for development in D&T and are taking the next steps to move forward.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring parents are clear about the purpose of D&T  developing assessment systems to thoroughly check pupils’ progress to improve the quality of teaching and learning.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website under the URN for your school. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion