Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Jun 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Rutherford

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Rutherford

  • Postcode verified

    S61 2JD

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedimprovingeffectivelystrongclearpositivewell supported
Criticismweaknot yetpoorinadequateinconsistencyinsufficientbelowabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1170w+37
  • Leadership615w+72
  • What needs to improve17w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,802
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Leadership 34%What needs to improve 1%

Full report text

Mrs Karen Smith Headteacher Meadow View Primary School Meadowhall Road Kimberworth Rotherham South Yorkshire S61 2JD

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Meadow View Primary School

Following my visit with Stephen Wall, additional inspector, to your school on 10 and 11 June 2010, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Meadow View Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in February 2010. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Meadow View Primary School

Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Meadow View Primary School

Newly qualified teachers may be appointed.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Meadow View Primary School

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Meadow View Primary School

I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the chair of governors and the Strategic Director of Children and Young People’s Services for Rotherham.

p.1

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566930 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email : gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com Page 2

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors observed the school’s work, scrutinised management documents and analysed pupils’ work. They met with the headteacher, senior and middle leaders, groups of pupils, the chair of governors and three representatives from the local authority, one of whom is also the School Improvement Partner.

p.2

Context

Since the inspection there have been significant changes to staffing. Some vacant posts are not yet filled with permanent appointments, but arrangements to do so are well advanced.

p.2

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Evidence from lesson observations, pupils’ work and school records show that the proportions of pupils making expected and better than expected progress in English and mathematics have increased since the inspection. Rapidly improving progress in independent writing is a particular strength. Although pupils’ progress is improving overall, there is still some variability because of the legacy of weak teaching in a small number of classes. In addition, the history of weak and disrupted teaching experienced by the oldest pupils means that improving progress is not yet having an impact on standards at the end of Key Stage 2.

p.2

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

The progress of groups who speak English as an additional language and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities has improved since the inspection. This is because a recently appointed inclusion coordinator has introduced more effective methods for assessing their needs and planning suitable support. The achievement of children in the Early Years Foundation Stage has improved this year, most notably in personal and social development, reading, writing and calculating. This is due to a new phase leader introducing more effective approaches to planning, teaching and assessment.

p.2

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Progress since the inspection on the areas for improvement:  Increase the rate of pupils’ progress and raise attainment in English and mathematics – satisfactory

p.2

Other relevant pupil outcomes

Behaviour and attendance are better than they were at the time of the inspection. This is largely because a recently appointed middle leader is introducing imaginative and effective methods for encouraging pupils to improve, for example, basing Page 3 rewards and sanctions on life aboard a pirate ship. The school’s effective partnership with external support services has also had a positive impact. Better behaviour is helping pupils to settle down to work in lessons and make better progress. Absence overall is reducing and there has been a significant drop in persistent absenteeism, however, attendance is still below the national average.

p.2

Other relevant pupil outcomes

Pupils work well independently and they often use discussion with partners effectively to plan answers to teachers’ questions. They make less progress in the minority of lessons where they are required to sit and listen for long periods. Pupils enjoy school much more than they did a year ago because teaching is better, poor behaviour has significantly reduced and they have many more opportunities to go on trips to places of interest. They have an increasing influence on decisions that affect their life in school, for example, their ideas have made a strong contribution to the success of the new strategies for improving behaviour and attendance.

p.3

Other relevant pupil outcomes

Progress since the inspection on the areas for improvement:  Implement effective strategies to reduce absence – satisfactory

p.3

The effectiveness of provision

The quality of teaching and use of assessment have improved since the inspection. There is no longer any inadequate teaching and an increasing proportion is good or better. There is still some inconsistency linked to recent changes in staffing. In the most effective lessons, a brisk pace of learning is maintained because the emphasis is on pupils doing interesting tasks rather than listening or answering questions for long periods. Pupils know what they are aiming to achieve in each lesson and teachers regularly check their progress to see if they need extra guidance or challenge. In a minority of classes, teachers do not target their questions sufficiently to check the understanding of all groups of pupils, nor are their questions probing enough.

p.3

The effectiveness of provision

The majority of teachers are quickly improving their understanding of the different levels at which their pupils are working and they plan work that is suitably challenging for most groups. Occasionally, there is insufficient challenge for higher attaining groups in mathematics. A recently introduced system for providing pupils with targets is quickly becoming established. As a result, many pupils already show a clear understanding of what they are aiming for and how to use their targets to improve their day-to-day work. A new approach to marking, which is not yet fully embedded in all classes, ensures that many pupils are given clear guidance on how to improve their work and they are given well-planned opportunities to put this guidance into practice with their teacher’s support. In a small number of classes, some pupils are beginning to assess their own work and take the initiative in discussing their problems with the teacher.

p.3

The effectiveness of provision

Page 4 The curriculum has improved since the inspection. Pupils’ learning in a range of subjects is increasingly enriched by interesting projects, visitors to school and trips to places of interest. A recent visit to a literacy centre, for example, significantly increased the enthusiasm of younger pupils for reading. A ‘Spanish Day’ greatly increased pupils’ understanding of another culture. The school is implementing a new approach to linking subjects around interesting themes in order to increase pupils’ motivation for learning, however, this work is at too early a stage to see any significant positive impact.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

The school has significantly improved the curriculum for groups of pupils requiring additional support and this is improving their progress. Currently, these groups include pupils who are underachieving, those who speak English as an additional language and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. The progress of these groups is monitored carefully in order to refine their support where required. Plans are well advanced for extending this approach to looked after children and pupils who are identified as gifted and talented.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

Progress since the inspection on the areas for improvement:  Strengthen the quality and consistency of teaching and the use of assessment – satisfactory  Ensure the curriculum engages pupils and motivates them to learn –

p.4

The effectiveness of leadership and management

The recently appointed headteacher provides a very strong drive for school improvement. She effectively combines this drive with providing support and clear guidance to staff and this maintains their high morale and team spirit during the hard work to remove the causes of special measures. The headteacher is well supported by a new deputy headteacher who is making a significant contribution to whole-school leadership. In particular, he has introduced effective methods for gathering and analysing information about pupils’ progress, which is enabling the school to be more thorough in evaluating the impact of teaching on pupils’ learning.

p.4

The effectiveness of leadership and management

The school is very quickly building its capacity to sustain improvement by developing the role of middle leaders. For example, teachers have recently assumed leadership roles for the Early Years Foundation Stage, behaviour and attendance, literacy, and pupils with additional needs. As a result of their work, pupils’ outcomes in each of these areas have improved.

p.4

The effectiveness of leadership and management

Underpinning the school’s improvement is an increasingly robust approach to monitoring and evaluating the school’s provision and its impact on pupils’ outcomes. Information about the quality of teaching and pupils’ learning is systematically gathered from lesson observations, teachers’ planning and pupils’ work and this is used effectively to provide guidance which helps teachers to improve their work. The Page 5 information is also used to inform a school improvement plan which is well focused on the most important priorities for improving standards. Governors are not making a sufficient contribution to the school’s evaluation and improvement planning. Since the inspection, the chair has spent more time gathering information about the work of the school, but there has been little improvement in the support, challenge or direction provided by the governing body as a whole. Their work has been hampered

p.4

The effectiveness of leadership and management

The school’s approach to promoting community cohesion has improved since the inspection. An audit has been carried out with the support of the local authority; priorities have been identified and a clear plan is in place to tackle them. A key priority is to improve the inclusion of the growing number of children and families from minority ethnic backgrounds. The school has made a start on this, but it is too early for any noticeable impact.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

The school has gained considerable support this year from parents as a whole because their involvement is encouraged and their views about the school are sought and used in planning improvements. The school has systematic arrangements in place for checking the suitability of all adults who come into contact with pupils, for ensuring all staff receive child protection training and for assessing risks in out-of-school activities.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

Progress since the inspection on the areas for improvement:  Ensure monitoring and evaluation is rigorous, sharply focused on pupils’ learning and helps to bring about rapid improvement – good  Ensure the governing body holds the school to account through challenge, support and setting a clear direction – inadequate  Develop strategies for promoting community cohesion and evaluate their impact on pupils’ understanding of the cultures both in school and the wider world – satisfactory

p.5

External support

The local authority’s statement of action fulfils requirements. It effectively includes the national Improving Schools Programme and suitably adapts it to the school’s needs. The local authority recognises the growing capacity within the school to evaluate the impact of new approaches and to take the initiative in refining them. The new headteacher is well supported in her work by an effective local authority induction programme, including mentoring from an experienced headteacher. Detailed, analytical evaluation by the School Improvement Partner helps the headteacher to be clear about what needs to be tackled in the short term in order to meet the priorities within the school improvement plan.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

 Increase the capacity of the governing body to provide support, challenge and direction to the school.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion