Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Oct 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen Long

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen Long

  • Postcode verified

    PO20 8NH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
18
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Mrs Sue Parker Headteacher East Wittering Community Primary School Stocks Lane East Wittering Chichester West Sussex PO20 8NH

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 22 September 2010 and for the information which you provided during my visit. Please pass on my thanks also to the pupils and governors who met with me.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Since the last inspection, the school has been supported by a range of local authority personnel, including a consultant headteacher. Two teachers have left and one has returned from maternity leave. The number of classes has reduced by one due to a changing distribution of pupils in age groups. The total pupil number is unchanged. Two governor vacancies have been filled and the governing body is at full strength.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

As a result of the inspection on 26 January 2010, the school was asked to improve teaching and accelerate pupils’ progress in writing and mathematics through better use of assessment information, and to improve its development planning by more effective analysis of pupils’ progress, by stating more explicitly the actions required to bring about improvement and by citing measurable success criteria.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making:

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the pupils’ achievement.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Pupils’ achievement has begun to improve in writing and mathematics, particularly in Key Stage 2 where progress was too patchy. Their attainment remains below that expected for their ages but is rising as a result of better teaching. The school is focusing more closely on the achievement of different groups, such as boys, so that the overly-wide gap between their achievement and that of the girls is narrowing. Tribal Education 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0845 123 6001 Direct F 0845 123 6002 email :sarah.cartlidge@tribalgroup.com

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

However, there remains much to do, as shown by the results of the summer term Year 6 assessments. These show an improvement in mathematics, where the school met its target for the proportion of pupils reaching the nationally expected level, but were less positive in English where writing targets were missed for a second year. Pupils continue to enjoy learning and their good behaviour is a feature of lessons. They cooperate well together and are beginning to be more independent as learners, for example when referring to their targets for writing.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The use of assessment information to support learning has begun to improve. The school is developing better ways to establish pupils’ attainment levels accurately, including the many joining at times other than at the start of the Reception Year. This information is being used more effectively to set challenging targets for pupils. Progress tracking is also sharper and is beginning to identify underachieving pupils more systematically, so as to adapt teaching and/or organise extra support. Lesson planning refers more explicitly to pupils’ differing needs, although some inconsistencies remain. When pupils work in small groups, tasks are better matched to their attainment. Conversely, whole-class phases of lessons do not always engage all pupils. Some lesson introductions lack clarity about how the forthcoming tasks will enable pupils, working at different levels, to meet or exceed their targets, and some

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

plenary discussions are not relevant to all pupils. On occasion, teachers use questioning well to assess pupils’ understanding as lessons proceed, but this too is not embedded. There is a growing awareness among pupils of what their targets are and that staff want them to achieve these. They value the target reminder cards, now well established in writing and becoming more regularly used in mathematics. Marking has improved due to a new policy. Pupils are finding it more useful and are rightly being asked to respond to what is said. Where marking is still not effective, it lacks detail or clarity about what the pupil is expected to do as a result of reading it.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The improvements in teaching arise from closer monitoring of its quality in relation to pupils’ progress in lessons and over time. Professional development is better linked to individual staff needs and whole-school issues, leading to the progress in assessment and other areas such as the now more effective contribution of teaching assistants. Staff have begun to share good practice more widely, for example through modelling approaches to teaching in training sessions. External partners, such as local authority personnel, are contributing to the improvements through working alongside school staff.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

More accurate assessment of pupils’ progress has enabled the school to sharpen its strategic planning. The revised plan aims squarely at raising attainment in writing and mathematics. The headteacher has successfully rallied the staff team around the plan. Its actions link logically to what needs to be done and there are clearer milestones to check progress toward long-terms goals. Some opportunities are still missed, however, to include explicit targets for pupils’ attainment in the plan and in the way staff are held to account. The governors are providing better support and challenge. They visit more often to check the progress being made and have greater involvement in evaluating the school’s progress. They have received some useful

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

training and are determined to help the school, but recognise that they need a better understanding of how to use assessment information to check the impact made on pupils’ progress.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The local authority statement of action was judged as requiring improvement when submitted after the last inspection. It has been suitably amended and is now fit for purpose because is clearer about the actions to be taken by local authority staff and the evaluation of their impact on the school. The locality link officer and consultant headteacher are building the school’s capacity for improvement while offering judicious support and guidance. They are helping staff make better use of their own expertise and bringing in external support as required.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion