Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Jun 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Middleton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Middleton

  • Postcode verified

    NR19 1JB

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+19Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery wellstrongeffectivelyeffectiveproudenjoymententhusiasticpositively
Criticismnot alwayslackvariablenot strengthnot confidentlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings581w+21
  • Leadership287w+4
  • What needs to improve160w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,017
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%Leadership 28%What needs to improve 16%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs A Kahn Headteacher Fred Nicholson School Westfield Road Toftwood Dereham NR19 1JB

p.1

design

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 23 March 2010 to look at work in art, craft and design.

p.1

design

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on how effectively students learn to draw with confidence and creativity.

p.1

design

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

design

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of lessons.

p.1

design

The overall effectiveness of art, craft and design is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in art, craft and design

Students’ achievement in art, craft and design is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in art, craft and design

 Overall, students make satisfactory progress in developing their subject skills, knowledge and understanding. Their progress on themed days is often accelerated. Effective work is created when students are taught how to use experimentation, for example lower school ‘planets’ using bubble printing and pastel blending. However, not all students understand that artists often learn from their mistakes by capitalising on the unexpected.  Students who achieve a GCSE in the subject progress well in handling art media, tools and techniques. The students interviewed were very motivated and proud of their achievements. They record observations with increasing care and develop the confidence to express their own ideas. However, their work does not always express the strength of their feelings or capture the enjoyment of their sensory experiences.

p.1

Quality of teaching of art, craft and design

The quality of teaching of art, craft and design is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching of art, craft and design

 Students’ learning and progress are supported very well by enthusiastic teaching assistants who use their knowledge about individuals to build positively on what students can do. Their impact on achievement is best when the clear behavioural objectives combine subject-specific learning objectives with a variable aspect of lesson planning. Traditional techniques are clearly taught well, for example drawing from still life.  Assessment in the subject is regular, but information is not always used to personalise activities, for example by enabling students to work on different scales or apply their existing skills referenced in sketchbooks, to fresh challenges. An impressive display inspired by the garden indicated that when students are introduced to a shared stimulus, but are taught how to explore diverse ways of responding, their creativity flourishes.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in art, craft and design

The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in art, craft and design

 The curriculum enables students to access opportunities to work with specialist staff and occasionally work with visiting artists whose skills, for example in sculpture, complement those taught regularly. Students’ wider experiences recorded on visits or explored through use of computers are underused. However, visits to see other students’ work in a mainstream school inspire the students and contribute to their understanding of GCSE.  Schemes of work are individually sound. Some links are made with other subjects and art forms, particularly on theme days. However, the lack of a long-term subject overview of progression accessible to all staff, limits the use of other subjects to reinforce or apply students’ art, craft and design skills. Plans to use the common assessment framework to promote continuity and progression across the curriculum are at an early stage.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management of art, craft and design

The effectiveness of leadership and management of art, craft and design is satisfactory.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management of art, craft and design

 Senior staff recognise the importance of visual communication, particularly in a special-school setting, and value the contribution of the subject to an increasingly strong core of wider arts provision. However, there is rightly a commitment to widening the impact of the subject on the achievement and personal development of more students, evident in the current evaluation of different levels of accreditation. Subject plans are appropriate and informed by the involvement of an advanced skills teacher from another school. While positive about their experiences, students also shared relevant ideas about improvements, for example visiting a gallery.  Links made with the community contribute to the effectiveness of the subject. For example, students’ work exhibited in the local doctor’s surgery and in the town hall in France where the school is twinned, help to realise the school’s aim to enable all learners to ‘recognise, develop and celebrate

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management of art, craft and design

their own creativity as artists’. However, students’ achievements in school are not always presented well, or shared in a way that promotes other students’ curiosity, for example through giving value to process.

p.3

confidence and creativity

Students’ learning about how to draw with confidence and creativity is satisfactory.

p.3

confidence and creativity

 Traditional drawing approaches are taught well, enabling students to develop the confidence to record observations with increasing skill and intensity. There is less evidence of students’ creativity developing through mark-making and experimentation, which limits the range of students who believe in their capacity to draw. Drawing is used frequently by non- specialist staff to communicate with students and evaluate their understanding in other subjects. However, not all staff are confident in their own drawing or how to contribute to students’ progress in drawing.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 increasing students’ confidence in using art, craft or design expressively by:  using the wide range of knowledge and assessment information about individual students to personalise the curriculum  enabling more students to make connections with other artists, craftworkers and designers through first-hand experience  developing regular use of sketchbooks to store experiments, record outside experiences, extend ideas and capture feelings

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 strengthening the impact of the subject across the school by:  providing clear indicators of progression in the subject and identifying opportunities to apply students’ learning more widely  establishing a focal point that celebrates students’ creative achievements and informs others about how it came about.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop art, craft and design education. As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to your next institutional inspection team.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion