Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Jul 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alan Alder

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alan Alder

  • Postcode verified

    IP26 4DB

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
21
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Mr Stephen Kite and Mr Paul Seeman Co-headteachers Edmund de Moundeford VC Primary School, Feltwell The Beck Feltwell Thetford IP26 4DB

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 24 June 2010 , for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during my visit. I should be grateful if you would also give my thanks to the pupils and staff with whom I spoke and to the governors I met and the School Improvement Partner.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

A new headteacher has been appointed to lead the school, from September 2010.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

As a result of the inspection on 11-12 November 2009, the school was asked to:

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

 increase the impact of teaching and learning on raising standards and promoting progress by better matching activities to pupils’ needs, by ensuring that pupils know exactly what they should be learning, and by improving curriculum provision including the teaching of literacy and numeracy throughout the curriculum  improve leadership and management by improving the rigour and impact of the monitoring process, the accuracy of self-evaluation and by ensuring that governance meets statutory requirements  improve the outdoor play area for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage so that it meets requirements and children are able to choose freely between activities indoor and out.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory. The standards they are reaching are average and they are making satisfactory progress. Pupils’ attendance was showing decline but is now improving, though it is still low. Serco Inspections Boundary House 2 Wythall Green Way Middle Lane BIRMINGHAM West Midlands B47 6LW T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Page 2 The curriculum has been adapted so there are now more opportunities for pupils to develop their literacy and numeracy skills. There are good examples of where other subjects, for example history and geography are used as vehicles for the development of extended writing. The work is marked thoroughly with a clear emphasis on improving literacy skills. In addition some longer blocks of time have been devoted to extended writing. Numeracy is developed in subjects such as science, geography and information and communication technology. The effect of

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

this is that, although progress in writing in Years 5 and 6 is still patchy, it is improving and there is clear evidence of improvement in other years.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

The understanding by pupils of what they will learn is becoming clearer. In lessons seen, learning objectives were generally well-considered and effectively communicated to pupils so they understood what it is they were to do and how it would develop their learning. There were also some good examples of where work was better matched to pupils’ prior knowledge, though this is inconsistent. For example, in some work on persuasive writing, pupils were asked to write some persuasive words, while higher attaining pupils were asked to produce some persuasive text. Although a good example of questioning being used to probe understanding was seen during the inspection, the use of questions as a means of assessment in lessons are under-used. However, there is some very good practice in assessment through marking, with very well-matched follow-up tasks set as a result. For example the marking of a piece of writing of a play suggested writing more

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

detail in stage directions. This was then set this as an objective in the next piece of work which was achieved well. In one piece of extended writing, pupils were asked to develop different aspects of their writing, such as the use of adjectives and similes for example. This had a good effect on the pupils’ writing.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Leaders now monitor teaching, lesson plans, pupils’ work and the progress they are making more frequently. The evidence from the inspection shows that the assessments, for example of writing, are largely accurate. For one year group however, some assessments have shown anomalies, with some pupils apparently becoming much worse in their writing in the course of a term and then one term later making large advances. As a result the school’s leaders have made a change to the method of assessment for next year. The written records of the evaluation of teaching quality place more emphasis on what the teacher does, rather than the impact of teaching on learning and progress. The judgements about teaching quality, that it is largely good, are not in keeping with the satisfactory progress being made by pupils. However, the judgements made by school leaders during the inspection were accurate.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Governors have now ratified their policies on community cohesion and equal opportunities. They are now monitoring the impact of the policies.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

The outdoor play area for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage has been improved by the installation of a safer surface that does not become waterlogged Page 3 when it rains. Plans have been submitted for approval to allow significant changes to the building so that pupils can move between indoors and outdoors unimpeded, but safely.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

The local authority’s action plan had omissions initially. It has now been amended and meets requirements. The local authority’s support for the school has been satisfactory.

p.3

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Page 4 Once the school has had 24 hours to report any factual inaccuracies , the post-visit letter is copied as appropriate to the following:

p.4

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 Appropriate authority - chair of governors/Interim Executive Board  Local authority – except for academies  For the Secretary of State use the following email address: CausingConcern.schools@dcsf.gsi.gov.uk )  Contractor providing support services on behalf of the local authority - where appropriate  Diocese – for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools

p.4

Her Majesty’s Inspector

A copy with editing marked up should be forwarded to the: Lead inspector

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion