Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Jul 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Coleman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Coleman

  • Postcode verified

    BB5 2SW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
19
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Mr Stephen Oldfield Headteacher St John’s Stonefold C of E Primary School Rising Bridge Road Accrington Lancashire BB5 2SW

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 13 July 2010 and for the information which you provided during my visit . Particular thanks go to the pupils, governors, staff and local authority representatives who met or spoke with me.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Since the last inspection one part-time teacher has left the school. A new appointment has been made to this post with effect from 1 September 2010. Significant teaching staff absence was experienced by one class during the spring term. The school caretaker is long-term absent and his post is currently covered by a temporary part-time replacement. The governing body has appointed three new members. They have established a new school effectiveness committee to manage the school’s programme for improvement. The local authority provides additional advice and consultancy to support the school’s improvement.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

As a result of the inspection on 7–8 December 2009, the school was asked to

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

 Raise standards and achievement particularly for the most able pupils and the older Key Stage 1 and younger Key Stage 2 pupils, by: o improving the effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation systems so that underperformance is identified and tackled quickly and effectively.  Improve the quality of teaching so that more is of a consistently good standard, by: o rigorously using assessment information to plan work which matches pupils' interests, needs and abilities, especially of the more able Suite 22 West Lancashire Investment Centre Maple View White Moss Business Park Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 e-mail gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com Page 2 o ensuring pupils are aware of their individual targets so that they know how well they are doing and understand their next steps in learning o improving the effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation systems so

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the pupils’ achievement.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

In collaboration with the local authority, an improvement plan has been established which suitably targets the key areas identified at the last inspection. Governors monitor the school’s progress towards these targets and minutes of meetings held by governors show evidence of much improved challenge and a clear determination to hold school leaders to account for the progress being made. Governors now receive reports from curriculum leaders, but this is at a very early stage of being embedded. Their curriculum monitoring roles and responsibilities are newly established. Information is received by governors from the results of monitoring by the local authority and by the headteacher. The systems for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of the school’s work are improved. These systems are relatively embryonic and some lack regularity and consistency. For example, observations of the quality of teaching are made but the results of this are not

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

systematically collated or matched against the governors’ targets for the proportion of good or better lessons. Good data analysis is made from the outcomes of assessments of pupils’ attainment. This provides a summary analysis of pupils’ progress over the year but does not break it down to show more precise measures since the last inspection. This makes it difficult for governors to evaluate the progress the school is making towards the targets set for these.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Pupils’ attainment is rising steadily as shown by the results of the school's assessments and provisional results for national tests. The rate of progress is variable but improving slightly. Over time, pupils in Key Stage 2 are showing signs of improving progress including the most able. Within the year groups and during the current academic year, their progress has accelerated a little, but this is inconsistent between classes and across subjects. The intervention programmes provided by the school for pupils in danger of underachieving are effective and ensure that they make much better progress. These groups benefit from precise expectations about what pupils should learn. They receive tightly structured programmes of work with clear identification of pupils’ learning.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Overall, pupils are making better progress due to improvements to the overall quality of teaching and learning. There remain significant variations. All teachers plan conscientiously, but the format of planning is different across the classes. Teachers plan objectives for pupils to attain but many are too broad and focus on the activities pupils will do rather than the learning which should occur as a result. Consequently, in some lessons observed, the pace and expectations of what pupils Page 3 should learn in a given time are too little. For example, in the weaker lessons seen, teachers give overlong explanations which take far too much lesson time. Teachers organise their classes into ability groups and the pupils are fully aware of this. They say that this helps them to work better together. Most pupils know their targets for learning and say that they are reviewed at various points during the year; this is

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

significantly improved since the last inspection. Teachers’ marking of pupils’ work is completed and praises pupils’ achievements with stickers and comments. However, marking is often insufficiently related to pupils’ targets and does not help pupils enough to understand how to improve their work. The training and development of staff have improved and ensure that lessons are structured around a three-part process. There is a policy in place which identifies the features of good teaching and effective learning. The monitoring and evaluation of the impact of the training do not focus sufficiently on these elements and opportunities are not taken to reinforce and strengthen teaching in a regular and systematic way.

p.3

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

Support for the school from the local authority is good. A clear plan put in place following the last inspection is fit for purpose and sets out the range of consultancy and advice to be offered. The school has welcomed this external support and teaching has improved as a result of the staff training provided by the local authority.

p.3

Ofsted monitoring of schools with a notice to improve

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion