Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
John Coleman
- Postcode verified
BB6 7ES
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,490
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Darren Mussell Great Harwood St John’s Church of England Primary School St John’s Street Great Harwood Blackburn Lancashire BB6 7ES
p.1
Church of England Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 21 and 22 April 2010, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.
p.1
Church of England Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in November 2009. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.
p.1
Church of England Primary School
Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory .
p.1
Church of England Primary School
Newly qualified teachers may not be appointed .
p.1
Church of England Primary School
This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.1
Church of England Primary School
I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the Chair of Governors, the Diocese of Blackburn and the Director of Children’s Services for Lancashire.
p.1
Church of England Primary School
John Coleman Her Majesty’s Inspector CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancashire Investment Centre Maple View White Moss Business Park Skelmersdale, WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com
p.1
Evidence
The inspector observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the Chair of Governors, the headteacher, pupils, staff and a representative from the local authority.
p.2
Context
The school has experienced significant staff changes this year with two full-time teachers leaving their posts. Temporary staff are covering these vacancies. Support is being received from local authority consultants and advisers who are working with the school to help improve the quality of teaching and learning and the use of information and communication technology. Additionally, the school’s leadership team receives mentoring and guidance from an experienced local headteacher. Membership of the governing body has seen small changes due to the expiry of the terms of office of the parent and staff governors.
p.2
Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
The standards attained by pupils show early signs of rising, although the pace of this improvement varies across year groups and classes. This variation is strongly correlated to the staffing instabilities which have hindered pupils’ progress this year. Evidence from the school’s tracking system shows pupils making overall satisfactory progress in reading, writing and mathematics during the current academic year. Most encouraging is the evidence from this data which demonstrates that progress is accelerating, as seen in the better rates of progress in the spring term compared with the autumn term, although progress in writing is not as strong as that found in reading and mathematics. There is a legacy of underachievement, which in some year groups continues to restrict the amount of progress being made. This is improving, but there is some way to go before all year groups make consistently good progress. The targets set by the school for the attainment of pupils in Year 6 in
p.2
Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
2010 are challenging and observations in classrooms during the inspection show that satisfactory progress is being made towards these for most pupils. The school’s assessment data suggests that the most able pupils are not on track to meet the school’s set targets.
p.2
Other relevant outcomes for pupils
In response to the low attendance of a significant number of pupils, the school has initiated a range of incentives to encourage good attendance. Pupils who spoke to the inspector said that these where working well and they quoted examples of pupils who are attending more regularly as a result. Each term, every pupil with 100% attendance receives a badge in reward of this achievement. At the end of the year all these pupils are entered into a raffle for a prize. Extra playtimes are offered to the class with the highest weekly attendance. Around the school, good attendance is promoted through lists of weekly winners. A special party or trip is also offered to the class with the best attendance at the end of each term. A systematic procedure is in place to remind parents and carers of the need to ensure that pupils attend regularly and non-attendance is followed up quickly and methodically. The outcomes
p.3
Other relevant outcomes for pupils
of the school’s efforts are improvements in the percentages of pupils attending school regularly, which have risen significantly to a current position much better than the comparable period last year, but a little below the target set by the governors. When consideration is given to the exceptional snow conditions and subsequent school closure, the figure rises above the target.
p.3
Other relevant outcomes for pupils
Progress since the last inspection on the areas for improvement: Raise attendance by working with low-attending pupils and their families – satisfactory .
p.3
The effectiveness of provision
The school has worked hard to develop and improve the quality of teachers’ lesson planning. With the support of local authority consultants in literacy and numeracy, the curriculum leaders have ensured that there is a consistent format to planning. This includes clear objectives for pupils’ learning which take into account the differing starting points for groups of pupils. However, the assessment data used by the school is quite complex and it is only recently that a more user-friendly way of presenting information has been formulated to help teachers know the precise attainment levels for all pupils in the class. Consequently, this embryonic system is at a very early stage of having an impact on the progress which pupils make as a result. Teachers are given increasing opportunities to work together and learn from one another’s practice. This process is developing satisfactorily. The leadership team, with the staff, has identified the essential features of good lessons but this
p.3
The effectiveness of provision
has yet to be formalised in policy. The quality of teaching and learning seen during this inspection visit was mostly satisfactory with some good aspects to many lessons. This is an improved profile to that seen at the last inspection. The data held by the school about the progress made by pupils correlates accurately with the school’s evaluations of the quality of teaching. This is supported further by the observations made during this inspection. In all lessons seen there were good relationships between staff and pupils, planning was well prepared, and suitable tasks and activities were organised to interest pupils. However, a principal weakness in the teaching continues to be the proportion of time given to teachers’ explanation and instruction compared with the time available for pupils to learn through the planned tasks. Not enough active learning is expected of pupils in lesson time and so their
p.3
The effectiveness of provision
progress is not maximised sufficiently well. In some lessons too much time is taken to complete simple tasks such as lining up before the lunch break.
p.4
The effectiveness of provision
Progress since the last inspection on the areas for improvement: Increase the proportion of good teaching to ensure that pupils make good progress and attainment improves by: - ensuring that lessons are planned to include a range of activities that relate to the needs of all pupils – satisfactory - sharing the best practice in teaching more systematically – satisfactory .
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
The school’s leadership team has responded satisfactorily to the issues raised at the last inspection. With the support of the local authority and under increasing scrutiny and challenge from the governing body, improvements are being made to the rigour and effectiveness of the school’s monitoring and evaluation systems. The local authority’s action plan has been used to inform the governors’ plan to improve the school. This provides useful time-frames and outlines the actions to be taken. However, the actions are too broad and lack the precision needed to identify sharply the success of the planned intentions.
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
The headteacher is successfully developing an appropriate range of monitoring activities which are carried out by the senior leadership team. A programme has begun to observe lessons, scrutinise pupils’ work, hold discussions with pupils and to analyse and evaluate the data from the school’s tracking system for pupils’ attainment and progress. The curriculum leaders for English and mathematics have an improving and accurate overview of the relative strengths and weaknesses in their subjects as a result of the monitoring activities. Evaluation of the outcomes of the leadership team’s monitoring is less formalised but this is developing. A number of governors have received local authority training since the last inspection in a variety of areas such as safeguarding, child protection, recruitment and succession planning. This is raising governors’ awareness and improving their knowledge and skills, which in turn is making an effective contribution to their ability to challenge
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
Progress since the last inspection on the areas for improvement: Establish a rigorous system for monitoring and evaluating provision and outcomes – satisfactory . Develop the role of the governing body in evaluation and in challenging the school to improve through additional training – satisfactory .
p.4
External support
The local authority gives good support to the school. The action plan provides a suitable steer to the school’s leadership team and is helping to direct the school’s improvement planning. Advisers make regularly visits to the school and, along with consultants, hold staff training sessions and assist in monitoring the school’s performance. The capacity added by the local authority amounted to approximately one and a half days per week during the spring term and there are plans for similar support in the summer term.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion