Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Mar 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Lindfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Lindfield

  • Postcode verified

    NE5 2LW

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+83Very positivemore positive than 85% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenthigh expectationsstrongstrengthsclearenthusiasticstrengthenjoy
Criticismerrors

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings437w+88
  • What needs to improve99w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
526
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs N Nelson-Taylor Headteacher Beech Hill Primary School Linhope Road West Denton Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE5 2LW

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 28 January 2010 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice

 The school draws on the considerable strengths and competencies of its staff. Leadership and management of literacy are strong and leaders set a clear direction to a cohesive and enthusiastic team of staff.  The development of pupils’ emotional, personal and social skills is a strength of the school. Pupils enjoy and benefit from opportunities to increase their self-esteem and confidence. This results in pupils showing excellent levels of behaviour, displaying a positive attitude to writing and reading tasks, and taking considerable pride in their achievements.  Lessons are planned in detail and are designed carefully to progressively build pupils’ writing skills over a sequence of lessons. Teachers regularly use their assessments to adapt these plans to meet the needs of pupils. For example, in a planned sequence of lessons, teachers are prepared to spend more time than originally envisaged to ensure that pupils have fully

p.1

Features of good practice

grasped key skills and concepts.  Pupils have a very clear understanding of what they will be learning in each literacy lesson. They are helped to understand the relevance of the lesson and why it is appropriate for them. Teachers refer back to the purpose of the lesson to guide pupils’ responses and to maintain high expectations of pupils’ outcomes.  Intervention programmes are based on a range of regular formal assessments and accurate ongoing assessments. These are used effectively to identify pupils who require additional support and to decide on the most appropriate type of support to improve pupils’ key skills.  The school has the confidence to use those intervention programmes that are most effective and to adapt those programmes on occasion to suit pupils’ identified needs. For example, the school uses aspects of national intervention programmes to provide short, focused sessions. The judicious

p.1

Features of good practice

use of professional development ensures that the quality of teachers’ and teaching assistants’ delivery of intervention programmes is high.

p.2

Areas for development

 Increase the opportunities to extend pupils’ speaking and listening skills in a range of contexts through the use of drama sessions and role-play scenarios.  Ensure a consistent emphasis on high standards of handwriting to improve pupils’ ability to identify errors and omissions in their use of punctuation and to increase the speed with which they transfer their ideas into print.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion