Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Mar 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony O’Malley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony O’Malley

  • Postcode verified

    B8 2LQ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionallyvery highstrongrichenjoyeffectivelysuccessfully
Criticismerrors

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings475w+77
  • What needs to improve86w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
552
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs L Webster Headteacher Thornton Junior School Thornton Road Ward End Birmingham B8 2LQ

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 25 January 2010 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included discussions with senior leaders, observation of three lessons and a meeting with a group of pupils to discuss their work. I also studied the school’s literacy policies and assessment data.

p.1

Features of good practice

 You have very high expectations of staff and pupils at Thornton. Your leadership and management have established a culture where everyone is committed to securing the best possible outcomes for all pupils, regardless of ability and personal circumstances.  You and other school leaders keep a sharp focus on maintaining high standards in literacy within a rich curriculum that the pupils thoroughly enjoy. Each half-term, senior leaders and teachers review how well pupils are progressing in reading and writing. As a result, pupils in danger of stalling in their progress are identified early and appropriate support is provided for them.  Almost all of the pupils speak English as an additional language. Teaching and non-teaching staff expertly meet their needs and, by the end of Year 6, standards are high in reading and writing. In the statutory tests at the end of Year 6 in 2009, 98% of pupils attained the expected level and close

p.1

Features of good practice

to half attained Level 5 in English.  Boys and pupils entitled to free school meals attain above the national average for all pupils in English.  The school has very strong systems of pastoral care. A team of well- qualified and experienced staff deals exceptionally well with personal, social and emotional matters that are potential barriers to achieving well.  Teachers’ marking identifies errors and underlying misconceptions. Written comments help pupils to identify the precise steps to improve their work. Marking helps pupils to take increasing responsibility for following up the advice offered and improving their work.  The quality of teaching observed was outstanding. Teachers deliver imaginative lessons that capture the pupils’ imaginations and develop their literacy skills. For example, in an outstanding Year 6 lesson, the teacher played the role of a witch, including costume, as a stimulus to for spoken

p.2

Features of good practice

and written language work.  Pupils are full of praise for their school. They know exactly what they are expected to achieve in literacy. They understand their reading and writing targets, which are used effectively by all staff to guide learning.

p.2

Areas for development

 We discussed strategies the school could develop to ensure the outstanding literacy practice observed in Years 3 and 6 is successfully developed in the new Early Years Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1 classes.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy in the school.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion