Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Mar 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    L32 9QX

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentvery highstrong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
306
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr P Cronin Headteacher St Laurence’s Catholic Primary School Leeside Avenue Southdene Kirkby, Liverpool Merseyside L32 9QX

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils during my visit on 26 January 2010 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with you and members of your staff; scrutiny of relevant documentation; discussion with a group of pupils; and observation of three part lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice

 The lessons I observed were of a very high quality. Key features of the lessons included: teachers’ very high expectations of what pupils would achieve; pupils’ very good behaviour; the excellent use of the interactive whiteboard and a range of other resources that captured the interest of pupils, especially boys; and the very strong focus on speaking and listening.  There is excellent pastoral support for families and children at all stages of their partnership with the school. Through your excellent leadership and management, you ensure that all staff are determined that no child will be left out or left behind.  You provide a wide range of extra curricular activities, at no cost to pupils and families, so that every child has the opportunity to succeed in activities beyond the academic. There were no obvious areas for development.

p.1

Features of good practice

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion