Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Feb 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael McIlroy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael McIlroy

  • Postcode verified

    M6 7WR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 49% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconfidentlysupportivestrengthsenjoyclearly
Criticismmissedlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings740w+19
  • Leadership185w+62
  • What needs to improve90w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
992
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr P Jameson Headteacher St Luke's RC Primary School Swinton Park Road Salford Greater Manchester M6 7WR

p.1

languages (ML)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 1 February 2010 to look at work in ML.

p.1

languages (ML)

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on how well the school is implementing entitlement in Key Stage 2.

p.1

languages (ML)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

languages (ML)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with nominated staff and two groups of learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three lessons.

p.1

Context

Since 2008, French has been taught by foreign language assistants to Years 3, 4 and 5. German is taught by an external specialist to Year 6 pupils.

p.1

Achievement in languages

 The progress made by pupils in lessons is satisfactory overall. Pupils’ speaking skills and their pronunciation are satisfactory overall. However, both these skills are stronger in German, where some pupils’ pronunciation is good. They know key salutations and phrases, numbers, days of the week and months of the year.  Listening skills are satisfactory. Most pupils listen attentively in lessons. Writing is developing satisfactorily. It is further developed in German, where Year 6 pupils are able to write simple sentences.  Reading opportunities are underdeveloped in French where pupils have some opportunities to read from interactive whiteboards, flashcards and displays. Those learning German also have opportunities to read from good quality displays and from games that require them to read.  Pupils’ understanding of grammar is beginning to develop. Older pupils learning German are aware of genders but pupils’ understanding of the

p.1

Achievement in languages

significance of accents is at an early stage of development.  The intercultural understanding of pupils is satisfactory. They can name the capital city of France, Parisian landmarks, some foods and customs. Pupils studying German knew about the previous partition of the country, German composers and other countries where German is spoken.  Pupils have a satisfactory understanding of the usefulness of languages. They know they are useful when travelling or working abroad and could name a number of careers, such as teaching, where they can be used.  Learning languages makes a satisfactory contribution to pupils’ personal development. Behaviour in lessons was satisfactory overall.

p.2

Quality of teaching in languages

 Teachers’ pronunciation is good and some is very good. Their subject knowledge is good. The target language is generally used well in lessons. There is some teaching of knowledge about language and of language- learning strategies. In a German lesson in Year 6, one pupil confidently explained what a cognate was.  In French lessons, some opportunities to enable pupils to practise speaking and improve pronunciation are missed. In a German lesson, pupils had good opportunities to practise new vocabulary with each other.  Teachers use a good range of resources, such as interactive whiteboards, puppets, games and songs. However, some activities last too long and some do not engage or challenge pupils sufficiently.  Planning is satisfactory overall. At its best, it outlines learning objectives clearly and how plenary sessions will be used. In some lessons, the use of the plenary session is underdeveloped. There is scope to make greater use

p.2

Quality of teaching in languages

of these sessions to reinforce new learning and to check pupils’ understanding.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in languages

 Pupils in Years 3, 4 and 5 learn French and those in Year 6 learn German. There is some French taught lower down the school. The time devoted to languages is good. There is some reinforcement of language learning in most classes at other times during the week. The language skills of pupils who speak English as an additional language are drawn on well by the school to promote languages learning.  Learning is supported satisfactorily by colourful classroom displays. A range of magazines and comics has very recently been purchased for pupils to read and browse at leisure.  The school has adopted an external scheme of work which meets the needs and interests of pupils.  There are, as yet, few extra-curricular activities where pupils are able to deepen and extend their knowledge of languages.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in languages

 You are very supportive of the introduction of ML. This is a priority in the school’s development plan. The rationale for teaching French is well founded as pupils’ holiday experiences and teachers’ strengths have been considered. The school is realistic about the effectiveness and sustainability of its current model of delivery. It has appropriate plans to enable class teachers to deliver languages in the future.  Staff have attended suitable training to aid the implementation of ML. A policy for ML has been drawn up and the subject leader has carried out a satisfactory evaluation of progress in the subject.  Good links with a local secondary school have been developed. There is scope to make more use of these links to enhance teachers’ development.  Monitoring of planning and lessons and of the development of assessment procedures are at an early stage of development.

p.3

Key Stage 2

 This is satisfactory. Teaching in languages is satisfactory overall. Both boys and girls enjoy languages and achieve satisfactorily in listening and speaking. Pupils receive some oral feedback on their work but arrangements for assessing their progress are underdeveloped.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing reading and opportunities for pupils to practise speaking in French  strengthening the use of plenary sessions so that new learning is reinforced and can be assessed  developing assessment and monitoring procedures.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop languages in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion