Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Jun 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Carole Skinner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Carole Skinner

  • Postcode verified

    HA5 2DR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh-qualityenthusiasmrigorousenjoyimprovedimprovingsuccessfulengaging
Criticismlackinsufficientnot make good progressvariableyet tonot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings773w+40
  • Leadership192w+27
  • What needs to improve82w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,028
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Leadership 16%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Lack Headteacher Harlyn Primary School Tolcarne Drive Pinner HA5 2DR

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 23 February 2010 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

As outlined in our initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the effectiveness of the school’s approaches to improving the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with you, the subject leader and groups of pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of parts of seven lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of mathematics is good.

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

 Pupils enjoy mathematics lessons and engage in all activities with enthusiasm. They concentrate well on tasks and work productively with others in paired and group activities. Year 3 pupils greatly enjoyed being waiters and customers in the class ‘pizza restaurant’ and cooperated well to work out the total cost of a meal.  Pupils’ attainment has risen in response to improved teaching and is now above average. The school has identified that pupils’ knowledge and understanding of measures are less well developed than other areas of mathematics. There is currently a whole-school focus on improving this aspect, which lay at the heart of the recent and very successful ‘Maths Week’.  Learning and progress are good across the school. Children get off to a flying start in Nursery and Reception and develop a good knowledge of number, calculations, shape and measures. As they progress through the school, they build on this good foundation and become increasingly

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

competent at using mathematical skills in a variety of real-life situations.  The high proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities achieve well because of the good support they receive. Pupils whose first language is not English make good progress because mathematical language is given high priority and they quickly acquire appropriate vocabulary to explain their ideas.

p.2

Quality of teaching of mathematics

The quality of teaching of mathematics is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching of mathematics

 Improvements in teaching have focused on making learning more interesting and engaging by providing pupils with a wide variety of practical activities set in real-life contexts. Year 5 pupils were highly motivated when tackling problems that involved percentages in a toy shop scenario.  High-quality questioning by teachers and classroom assistants promotes good learning through challenging pupils to think for themselves and explain their reasoning.  Rigorous assessments at the start of each unit of work show teachers where pupils are starting from. This enables them to identify those pupils who need to consolidate previous learning before moving on and those who are capable of greater challenge. Consequently, lessons are planned well to meet the needs of different groups within each class.  Pupils are increasingly involved in moving their own learning forward by referring to the class targets and deciding at which level they feel

p.2

Quality of teaching of mathematics

confident to challenge themselves. In the best lessons, teachers reinforce these expected outcomes at various points to keep pupils focused on learning.  The quality of marking is variable. In most cases, teachers assess how well pupils have done in relation to the objective for the lesson. Marking that develops learning and shows pupils the next steps is not consistent. Occasionally, teachers pose questions to pupils or suggest ways to improve, but there is little evidence to show that pupils are then given time to respond.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

The quality of the mathematics curriculum is good.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

 Previously, monitoring showed that there were insufficient opportunities for pupils to use and apply their mathematical knowledge and skills in real- life contexts. The curriculum now promotes these aspects of mathematics well and the school is buzzing with pupils engaged in a range of exciting activities, many of them linked to other aspects of the curriculum. Teachers are now exploring further ways to incorporate these activities into each block of work and to extend opportunities for pupils to acquire and practise mathematical skills in other subjects.  Support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is planned rigorously by specialist teachers and well-trained teaching assistants. Pupils who are learning to speak English receive additional support in advance of a new unit of work that equips them with the mathematical language necessary to understand the concepts. Weekly classes for the most able pupils, led by a specialist teaching assistant,

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

challenge them with open-ended investigations and provide valuable opportunities to discuss thinking and reasoning in a small group.  The recent ‘Maths Week’ greatly enhanced pupils’ learning about measures and involved parents successfully in supporting their children’s learning at home.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management of mathematics

The effectiveness of the leadership and management of mathematics is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management of mathematics

 The subject leader’s considerable expertise and passion for mathematics are driving improvement at a good pace. Her infectious enthusiasm is helping to build colleagues’ confidence in adopting increasingly creative approaches to teaching. In only her second year as mathematics coordinator, she has yet to spread her influence fully throughout the school by working alongside staff to model best practice.  Leaders’ thorough monitoring and evaluation of lessons, pupils’ work and teachers’ planning clearly identified the most important areas for improvement. These are now being tackled through carefully planned initiatives and strategies. For example, the subject leader has provided teachers with valuable guidance and resources to help them to devise opportunities for pupils to use and apply their mathematical skills.  Rigorous monitoring of pupils’ progress from term to term and regular meetings on pupils’ progress with every teacher enable senior managers

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management of mathematics

to target support where it is most needed. The subject leader carefully evaluates the impact of specific interventions, such as the use of a computer program for daily short practice sessions in Years 5 and 6 to consolidate learning.

p.3

improving the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

 The subject leader is undertaking training to become a leading mathematics teacher. She provides high-quality support and training for all staff. This has resulted in an increase in teachers’ subject knowledge, confidence and enjoyment of mathematics.  During the past year, all teachers had performance management targets based on improving provision and outcomes in mathematics. Individual training needs are identified and specific training is arranged to boost teachers’ knowledge and skills. In addition, all staff were trained in the use of assessment techniques and questioning to support learning.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing consistently good practice in marking so that it shows pupils the next steps in learning  extending opportunities for the subject leader to share her expertise across the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion