Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Feb 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Vic Chivers

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Vic Chivers

  • Postcode verified

    M45 7PH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+75Very positivemore positive than 76% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandinghigh expectationseffectivewell plannedstrongconfidenteffectively
Criticisminadequatenot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings615w+79
  • Leadership239w+34
  • What needs to improve104w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
935
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 25%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr C J Trees Headteacher Philips High School Higher Lane Whitefield Manchester M45 7PH

p.1

education

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 21 and 22 January 2010 to look at work in business education.

p.1

education

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the impact of 14 to 19 developments in business education.

p.1

education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

education

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of nine part-lessons and a Year 10 assembly.

p.1

education

The overall effectiveness of business education, including the development of students’ economic and business understanding and financial capability, is good with outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement in business education

Achievement in business education is good with outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement in business education

 The unvalidated 2009 examination results show attainment of students taking GCSE business courses to be well above that nationally. Most students make good, and some excellent, progress in relation to their prior attainment and their targets. Evidence from lessons and discussions with students supports this finding. Students achieve better than in many other subjects and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities achieve well.  Students have very good attitudes to learning and behaviour in lessons is excellent. They develop very good independent learning skills, show confidence in lessons and are prepared to ask searching questions.  Students not taking business examination courses develop good, and in some cases very good, economic and business understanding and financial/enterprise capabilities.

p.1

Quality of teaching in business education

The quality of teaching in business education is good, with outstanding features.

p.2

Quality of teaching in business education

 The great majority of teaching is good and none is inadequate; this is reflected in the good or better progress made by most students.  Teachers have good subject knowledge and are confident in their teaching.  Lessons are well planned and employ an appropriate range of approaches to engage students and meet their different needs.  Teachers have high expectations and excellent use is made of questioning to challenge students and encourage them to think about topics in depth. There is a strong focus on reinforcing knowledge and understanding of key business vocabulary; excellent use is made of some plenary sessions. Effective use is made of case-study material covering real-world examples.  Extensive and effective use is made of information and communication technology to support teaching and learning where appropriate.  All students are set challenging targets and progress towards these is monitored effectively. The students, including those with special

p.2

Quality of teaching in business education

educational needs and/or disabilities, are well supported in their learning. Teaching assistants make effective contributions to this.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in business education

The quality of the curriculum in business education is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in business education

 Examination courses in business meet the needs of students well. However, there is scope for improving opportunities for the students to visit local businesses and meet employers.  Students enjoy a wide range of challenging enterprise activities and learning, including through enterprise days and competitions.  Special opportunities for gifted and talented students help them apply their problem-solving and team skills in work-based contexts.  There are many good opportunities for all students to develop their economic and business understanding and financial capability. All Year 11 students follow the key and work skills programme. A range of subjects, work experience, and the wide range of enrichment activities, make further significant contributions.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in business education

The effectiveness of leadership and management in business education is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in business education

 Subject and senior leaders and managers set high expectations about securing improvement in the subject.  The business studies department has a good recent track record of raising attainment and achievement.  Self-evaluation is good and this has helped to develop realistic strategies for securing improvement. Students are set challenging targets. Their progress towards achieving them is closely monitored and interventions are made when there are signs of underachievement.  Departmental planning is good and appropriate schemes of work are either in place and/or being updated.  There is effective monitoring of staff performance and good support for professional development.  Students’ developing economic and business understanding and financial/enterprise capabilities are not assessed systematically as they move through the school. Although some mechanisms are in place to assess enterprise capabilities and key skills demonstrated during work

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in business education

experience, they are not yet well coordinated.

p.3

education

 Current provision in business education is good. The school has recently introduced new courses and is working in partnership with other institutions to improve provision further. Most students have access to an appropriate range of business courses.  There are clear progression routes for students with different levels of attainment. Post-16, level 1 to 3 programmes are available in the local area. Of the 2009 Year 11 cohort taking GCSE business courses, around 20% of students progressed to study a business qualification post-16.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 enabling business studies students taking examination courses to have regular engagement with local businesses and employers within their programmes  improving coordination of provision to develop a unified system for tracking and monitoring students’ economic and business understanding and financial/enterprise capabilities as they move through the school. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop business education in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion