Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Mar 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Scott

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Scott

  • Postcode verified

    SO18 1BU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 76% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingclearenthusiasmvery wellsuccessfulgood progressimprovingenjoy
Criticismnot alwaysbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings606w+62
  • Leadership160w+81
  • What needs to improve89w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
841
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%Leadership 19%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs S Trigger Headteacher Bitterne Park School Copsewood Road Bitterne Park Southampton SO18 1BU

p.1

technology (D&T)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 19 and 20 January 2010 to look at work in D&T.

p.1

technology (D&T)

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on how the school promotes awareness and relevance of D&T to students and their parents, and the extent to which their views contribute to the school’s evaluation of D&T.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of seven lessons.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The overall effectiveness of D&T is good.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

 Attainment is above average with an improving trend. The school has a clear focus on raising achievement and developing students’ confidence in the application of D&T skills. Attainment on entry to the school is slightly below average. By the end of Key Stage 3 standards are broadly average.  Staff encourage and support students to reach increasingly challenging targets and standards that are above average by Year 11.  Students enjoy the hands-on active learning that they are able to engage in during D&T activities. Relationships in lessons are productive and friendly. This enthusiasm, commitment, and trust in teaching staff assists in securing the good progress made. Students with special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported very well in classrooms with a strongly inclusive ethos and make similar progress to their peers.

p.1

Quality of teaching of D&T

 The teaching team has a wide range of skills and good subject knowledge that contributes well to the development of the department and the outcomes for students. Good behaviour, clear procedures and expectations in classrooms mean that lessons have a positive learning atmosphere.  Teachers’ planning is thorough and opportunities to encourage students to assess their own work used well. In the best lessons, learning opportunities are matched well to the abilities of individual students. However, some more able students are not always sufficiently challenged.  Good monitoring systems inform teachers’ planning. Students know their targets and can self-assess their work and that of others. However, the precision with which they use highly defined criteria is not embedded sufficiently in practice to ensure that all students understand the next stages of learning to work independently.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

The quality of the curriculum in D&T is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

 Students’ needs are adequately matched to the wide range of courses and qualifications provided at Key Stage 4. Students feel they received good guidance and support on the course, particularly for the completion of coursework.  The curriculum is developing well as the art and design and technology faculty comes together in recent restructuring. The school recognises that there is still work to do to ensure that students have more opportunities to develop more creative and diverse design work. Extensive and well founded plans are in place to develop a wider range of qualifications suited to students’ learning needs and interests.  The STEM club offers students a range of fantastic opportunities to get involved in further projects with science, mathematics and technology. The school has established very quickly a group of students who can talk with authority and enthusiasm about the work they have done.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

Leadership and management in D&T are outstanding.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

 Leaders have transformed D&T in a short period of time and considerable improvements in provision and students’ outcomes are evident. Clear evaluation and decisive action have led to good and improving teaching. The successful implementation of a long-term strategic plan is ensuring that D&T is moving forward with increasing pace.  Governors, senior leaders and members of the department are all committed to, and clear about, the further development of D&T. The restructuring and merging of art, design and technology are enabling analytical practitioners to build learning opportunities appropriate for the future.

p.2

of D&T to students and parents

Awareness and relevance of D&T to students and parents are outstanding.

p.3

of D&T to students and parents

 The school is very active and successful in promoting D&T and what it can offer all students. Students are clear about the relevance of D&T to careers as well as to ways that skills can be applied in other subjects. Many cross-curricular activities and opportunities develop D&T awareness.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing the curriculum to strengthen further the opportunities for creativity, a diverse range of work and independent learning  ensuring that teaching allows students of all abilities to make even greater progress through more challenging activities. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion