Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Jun 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gina White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gina White

  • Postcode verified

    DY8 4RU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentenjoyclearenjoymentproudeffectivelyconsistentlystrengths
Criticismweaknessesnot sufficientlynot rigorousnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings575w+64
  • Leadership178w+38
  • What needs to improve91w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
832
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs E Penn Headteacher St James Church of England Primary School Kingsway Woolaston Stourbridge DY8 4RU

p.1

technology (D&T)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 16 March 2010 to look at work in D&T.

p.1

technology (D&T)

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on how the school promotes awareness and relevance of D&T to pupils and their parents, and the extent to which their views contribute to the school’s evaluation of D&T.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The overall effectiveness of D&T is satisfactory with good features.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

Pupils’ achievement in D&T is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

 A range of activities in Nursery and Reception classes provides a useful start to the development of children’s basic making skills. For example, children enjoy and are supervised well in using tools such as hammers and nails.  Pupils continue to make satisfactory progress and reach the levels expected for their age by the end of Year 6. Their enjoyment and capability in D&T are developed well through activities that ensure pupils are clear about the needs of users and are able to plan how to make their products. For example, pupils in Year 1 demonstrate that they are aware of making their playground rides safe and are learning how to make them stable.  D&T contributes well to pupils’ personal development. Pupils’ behaviour and attitudes to learning are very good. They are well motivated and proud of their D&T work. Pupils think about how their products might work and enjoy the variety of D&T activities. Some pupils are beginning to

p.1

Achievement in D&T

develop enterprise skills and learn how to present their design ideas to an audience.

p.2

Quality of teaching of D&T

The quality of teaching in D&T is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching of D&T

 Teachers manage lessons and resources effectively. There is a clear purpose to designing and making activities. Very good use is made of strategies such as small group work and collaborative discussion. For example, Year 6 pupils identified questions to pose to others as they made their ‘Dragons’ Den’ presentations.  Recording and evaluation of pupils’ progress are not sufficiently rigorous or used consistently or regularly enough to inform teachers’ planning of the next steps to accelerate learning.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

The quality of the curriculum in D&T is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

 A broad range of experiences are planned well to provide relevant D&T activities and to meet pupils’ needs. Excellent use is made of stories to provide a meaningful focus and inspiration for pupils’ designing and making activities in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in other year groups throughout the school. Cross-curricular work is developing purposefully and provides meaningful links. For example, pupils’ work in D&T provides relevance to their literacy work.  The school has begun to produce plans for activities. While these detail what pupils will do, some are less clear about what pupils will learn, and consequently, are not as useful to teachers as they might be to inform assessment.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

Leadership and management in D&T are satisfactory.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

 D&T is led well by an experienced coordinator. She has a clear overview of the curriculum. Strengths and weaknesses are known and class teachers’, parents’ and pupils’ views inform plans. However, systems to assess and monitor pupils’ progress are underdeveloped. Records and data are not used sufficiently to evaluate standards in the subject or to identify where improvements might aid pupils’ progress as they move through the school.  A collaborative approach with senior leaders has led to developments in curriculum provision. Recent training opportunities are being used well to challenge ideas for curriculum development. Health and safety are clearly planned and taught. Pupils are developing good attitudes and respect for health and safety rules.

p.2

of D&T to pupils and parents

Awareness and relevance of D&T to pupils and parents are good.

p.3

of D&T to pupils and parents

 A clear vision for D&T is emerging. Communication is good and parents are well informed each term about what their children will be studying in D&T. Consequently, parents and pupils are positive about D&T and see its relevance to life skills and work.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 implement a system to assess, monitor and evaluate pupils’ progress in D&T  ensure records of pupils’ progress and areas for improvement in D&T are shared between class teachers and acted upon as pupils move through the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion