Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Feb 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Vic Chivers

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Vic Chivers

  • Postcode verified

    WN7 2LU

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+81Very positivemore positive than 83% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveexcellenteffectivelyoutstandingmake good progressstrongconfidentskilful
Criticismvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings648w+78
  • Leadership213w+56
  • What needs to improve109w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
946
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 26, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr S Preston Headteacher Bedford High School Manchester Road Leigh Lancashire WN7 2LU

p.1

education

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 18 and 19 January 2010 to look at work in business education.

p.1

education

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject the visit had a particular focus on the impact of 14 to19 developments in business education.

p.1

education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

education

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of eight part-lessons.

p.1

education

The overall effectiveness of business education, including the development of students’ economic and business understanding and financial capability is good.

p.1

Achievement in business education

Achievement in business education is good.

p.1

Achievement in business education

 The provisional 2009 examination results show attainment of students taking GCSE Business and Communication Systems to be above that nationally. Most either achieved or exceeded their target grades. Standards on current business studies courses are at least in line with national levels.  Most business students make good progress in relation to their prior attainment, with no significant underachievement. Students with special educational needs and/or disabilities achieve satisfactorily.  Most business students have good attitudes to learning and many demonstrate an ability to learn independently; discussion skills are generally well developed. Behaviour in lessons is good.  Students not taking business examination courses develop good, and in a few cases, very good economic and business understanding and financial/enterprise capabilities.

p.1

Quality of teaching in business education

The quality of teaching in business education is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in business education

 Teaching in business studies is good and this is reflected in the progress made by most students. Teaching of enterprise lessons is more variable in quality, but good overall.  Lessons are planned well and there is good differentiation of learning activities.  Specialist teachers have good subject knowledge and are confident in their teaching. They deploy a good range of styles that effectively engages students and meets their varied needs. There is a good focus on reinforcing knowledge and understanding of key business vocabulary. Skilful questioning challenges students’ thinking.  Teaching makes effective use of case-study material covering real-world examples.  Effective use is made of information and communication technology (ICT) to support teaching and learning where appropriate.  Students are set challenging targets and progress towards these is monitored effectively. The students receive useful feedback on their work

p.2

Quality of teaching in business education

and helpful guidance on how to improve. Appropriate interventions are made where necessary and very good support is provided to help students revise and otherwise prepare for examinations.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in business education

The quality of the curriculum in business education is good, with some outstanding features.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in business education

 There is a strong focus on enterprise across the whole curriculum. Each student has a weekly timetabled lesson of enterprise learning throughout Years 7 to 11.  Examination courses in business and enterprise meet the needs of most students. Gifted and talented students have excellent opportunities to develop their enterprise skills, including through studying for an enterprise qualification in Year 9.  There are very good opportunities for students to engage directly with employers, although in business studies there is scope for developing these further.  All students have very good opportunities to develop their economic and business understanding and financial/enterprise capabilities. Enterprise and vocational programmes, personal, social, health and economic education (PSHEE), mathematics, citizenship, ICT, work-experience and the wide range of enrichment activities, including competitions and

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in business education

challenges, make significant contributions.  Students learn about rights and responsibilities through citizenship, religious education, assemblies and the various enterprise activities, including regular fundraising events for charities and recycling projects.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in business education

The effectiveness of leadership and management in business education is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in business education

 Self-evaluation is good and this has helped to develop realistic strategies for securing improvement.  Departmental planning is good and appropriate schemes of work are in place, supported by a very good range of teaching resources.  There is effective monitoring of staff performance and good support is provided, including for non-specialist teachers.  Students’ developing economic and business understanding and financial/enterprise capabilities are not assessed systematically as they move through the school. However, various mechanisms are in place to assess enterprise capability. Improved coordination of the various assessment regimes would enable them to be further developed and readily combined into a single comprehensive model.

p.3

education

 Current provision in business education is good. The school is working with partners to implement the Business and Finance Diploma in September 2010.  The school is a key player in disseminating good practice in enterprise learning locally, including to primary schools and schools more generally, including in neighbouring boroughs.  There are clear progression routes for students with different levels of attainment. Level 2 and 3 programmes are widely available post-16 throughout the local area. Around 50% of the Year 11 cohort taking GCSE business in 2009 progressed to study a business qualification post-16.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 enabling business studies students taking examination courses to have more frequent engagement with local businesses and employers within their programmes  improving coordination of provision to develop students’ economic and business understanding and financial/enterprise capability, including developing a unified system for tracking and monitoring students’ progress as they move through the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop business education in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion