Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Mar 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kathleen Tyler

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kathleen Tyler

  • Postcode verified

    WA14 5PQ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings31w0
  • What needs to improve100w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
130
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 78%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr P Carroll Deputy Principal Trafford College Manchester Road West Timperley Altrincham WA14 5PQ

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 survey inspection programme: good practice in literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and learners, during my visit on 11 February 2010 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 survey inspection programme: good practice in literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 survey inspection programme: good practice in literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of learners’ work and observations of lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice

 In all the lessons observed, learners are making good progress. Learners contrast their poor experiences and disappointing outcomes in English and literacy at school with literacy learning at Trafford College. They now greatly enjoy literacy classes, and describe how they have significantly increased their self-confidence, improved their spelling and punctuation and produce structured writing. Parents are now able to help their children with English at home. Learners’ achievement of externally accredited literacy qualifications at levels 1 and 2 is good.  Trafford College structures literacy learning provision effectively. Learners sit external tests when they are ready and then leave the provision. Those still in learning subsequently benefit from studying in smaller groups, with increased levels of individual attention.  Teaching and learning in literacy are good. They are planned well to take good

p.1

Features of good practice

account of individual learners’ needs and abilities. Well-structured lessons include an interesting range of activities and effective group and individual work. Teachers are skilled and experienced. They demonstrate a good understanding of which strategies will work best with particular learners. They make good use of well-produced and helpful worksheets and handouts which they often design individually for different learners. Teachers have a good rapport with learners and combine both formal and informal approaches effectively in the classroom. Learners generally work productively in lessons and at a good pace, with higher level learners receiving good levels of challenge.  The college has a well-organised and considered approach to initial and diagnostic assessment, to the identification of learners’ support needs, and to the provision of additional learner support in classes, individually and in small

p.1

Features of good practice

groups. Teachers pay particularly close attention to the recording of learners’ support activities and progress. They ensure very effective communication between learner support, vocational and personal tutors.  The college offers a wide range of literacy learning. This includes discrete provision and in-class support for learners aged 16 to 18 on full-time vocational courses, additional learning support for individuals and small groups, learning in the workplace for adults, and provision located in the community. The college has well-established links with the local council and local employers enabling it to contribute effectively to meeting workforce development needs in literacy. Provision is very flexible, offered at times and locations which suit learners and employers.

p.2

Areas for development

 We discussed the need to increase learners’ use of information and learning technology (ILT). Adult learners describe how their children use ILT to support their literacy skills development at school and regularly state they would also find this useful. Greater use of ILT would also provide greater variety for learners, particularly for those learners who learn in the workplace.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local Learning and Skills Council and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion